you have to PAY to view member gallery images large size???

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
That just isn't the case. Nothing more to say.

Why is it then that I'm able to look at as many straight or solo pics as I want but, whenever I go to look at a pic of two guys, I can't?

Smells like prejudice to me.

No - it really isn't the case. Users take pics up and down at their own discretion - the only way they are sorted or tagged by the site is if the user has chosen 'male' or 'female' in the profile. It just isn't possible that only the 'gay' shots are blurred for you. Show screen shots as proof or drop it, bud.
 

Tattooed Goddess

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Posts
14,086
Media
70
Likes
20,556
Points
668
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Female
Isnt LPSG started from a gay man? If so, im sure he'd be the first to make sure all of the gay people couldnt see the images they wanted to.

Ugh, quit the bitching pay for the membership or settle for thumbnails. This site isnt a democracy. We are lucky the owner even considers our opinion for anything. I've been a part of huge sites where it was a dictatorship and there was a bunch of spinoffs of pissed off members started their own gig. I don't see a lot of that around here because for the most part there isnt much to bitch about.

It's a privately owned site, if you owned some stock in it i'd see having reason to bring up advertising issues seriously. We spend more on Starbucks every morning than we would for a months membership here.

It's all about priorities.
 

MarkLondon

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Posts
1,911
Media
21
Likes
98
Points
193
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
You get a few days free full-size viewing when you join. Then you can either pay, submit a verification pic of your own, or make over 1,000 posts to the board if you want full viewing privileges.

Seems perfectly reasonable to me.