12''? Is it really?

DAMN! That's a fantastic cock! But it doesn't stop him from going balls deep into that gorgeous blonde.
Thank you for posting a brilliant piece of vintage porn.
 
haha, 90 men in the US in total whose penises are 10 inches or longer. Thats right, 90 out of 316 million.

Edit: no wait, I did that math wrong. Using the same math, the figure is 45 men in US whose cocks are 10 inches or longer, assuming half of the 316 million are men.
 
Last edited:
haha, 90 men in the US in total whose penises are 10 inches or longer. Thats right, 90 out of 316 million.

Edit: no wait, I did that math wrong. Using the same math, the figure is 45 men in US whose cocks are 10 inches or longer, assuming half of the 316 million are men.

"and only 30 in the entire country who possess 10 inches or more."

That is statistcally speaking.
 
I'm guessing the numbers he used in that post were from the last census, which was most likely in 2000. We do not instantaneously know the population numbers whenever we wish! We must reference them. I would say there would be a fair difference in population size over a 10 year period, wouldn't you? Besides, look at the number he uses for that calculation in the posts, 105 million. I googled the male population, and a found an official document saying the it was 138 million in 2002. The frequency in population in his post combined with that number is much closer 10 45 than 30.
 
If you guys used metric system you would laugh at those claims, 12'' is 30cm, I mean, a huge dick, my PC is 30cm tall, if there are penises this size, they are as rare as a unicorn.
 
^^^I wouldn't go as far as to say they do not exist. There probably is some guy in the world who has one, who also goes a little loopy every time he gets a semi, haha! This thread up till now has been focused on statistics and probabilities of 10"+ penises in the general public, which is an entirely different perspective.
 
I did that math wrong. Using the same math, the figure is 45 men in US whose cocks are 10 inches or longer, assuming half of the 316 million are men.

That probably wouldn't be far off.
But if you're looking for men, you're not, for example, looking for prepubescent kids.
So the number is smaller.
How much, I dunno.
 
I'm guessing the numbers he used in that post were from the last census, which was most likely in 2000. We do not instantaneously know the population numbers whenever we wish! We must reference them. I would say there would be a fair difference in population size over a 10 year period, wouldn't you? Besides, look at the number he uses for that calculation in the posts, 105 million. I googled the male population, and a found an official document saying the it was 138 million in 2002. The frequency in population in his post combined with that number is much closer 10 45 than 30.

15 more is a 50% icrease is all I`m saying, if it went from 30 to 45. That is a whole lot of population increase:p... Nevermind. The numbers are most likely wrong, big guys are more likely to show up for surveys to be measured. And we will never know the true avereage anyway, it will always be changing.
 
I hate it when people say "we will never know the true average". Yea, the true average to the 0.001" we will never know. But an average to the about 0.5" accuracy, sure we do!

Those numbers seem reasonable to me. When referring to the male population of about 140-150 million, that increase it not very significant.
 
That probably wouldn't be far off.
But if you're looking for men, you're not, for example, looking for prepubescent kids.
So the number is smaller.
How much, I dunno.

This is true. However, I assumed the change in size from one generation to the next would be negligible. My assumption is that every current living generation of males fit (will/did fit) the current data, regardless of their age.
 
I hate it when people say "we will never know the true average". Yea, the true average to the 0.001" we will never know. But an average to the about 0.5" accuracy, sure we do!

Those numbers seem reasonable to me. When referring to the male population of about 140-150 million, that increase it not very significant.

It is only statistical truth. What I mean is that you want the "true" average, you`ll have to measure every single human adult penis in the world. But yes, we can know the statistical truth. The "true" average will change from day to day as people mature and people die. And as I say, bigger guys are more likely to show up to get measured.