12''? Is it really?

Smaccoms

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Posts
2,778
Media
7
Likes
1,466
Points
583
Age
34
Location
Massachusetts (United States)
Sexuality
No Response
Everyone always assumes there is only a single way cocks are measured in any experiment, and then have a single reason to disregard all of them. This is fairly naive, as there are multiple methods all with varying advantages and disadvantages. Your claim therefore only holds when considering one of the multiple methods. On the whole, it falls apart. This post another forum makes it quite clear if your read the OP in its entirety:

What's The Average Penis Size?
 

SR_Hairy_Morgan

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Posts
1,233
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
73
Everyone always assumes there is only a single way cocks are measured in any experiment, and then have a single reason to disregard all of them. This is fairly naive, as there are multiple methods all with varying advantages and disadvantages. Your claim therefore only holds when considering one of the multiple methods. On the whole, it falls apart. This post another forum makes it quite clear if your read the OP in its entirety:

What's The Average Penis Size?

I am a member there:)
And the admins there have been in contact with lifestyles condoms and kinsey institute who conduct the serious surveys with medical personel and they have confirmed that the method they use and the method urologists preferes, therefore the method the average is based on is bonepressed erect length(bpel), because your bodyfat is not a factor when they are researching human penis size and it is the most reliable method for measuring stable results and more reliable for a group of medical personel to measure the same way, as much as possible, on a large number of people, not pressing the ruler more or less from person to person. Not saying it is a perfect method, but that is however th method they use.
On top of the penis, pressing ruler in towards the pubic bone and all the way to the tip of the glans, penis straight out while you are standing straight up. Failing to get a full erection disqualifies you from the survey.:)
Measure however you like! But the only thing you can compare with is the average and the surveys. Other guys can be measuring in a totaly different way than you or they can be lying.;)
 
3

326807

Guest
been here years..I get so tired of this silliness....the biggest guys on this site are around 10" or 11" are there bigger? possibly but no one to my knowledge here has ever produced a undoctored pic proving as such.As for the arguement that dicks that huge dont exist..let me say there must be guys like our own Bignlong and guys hung like Tony duncan who are approaching it. That said this is getting way old..lol
 

AlphaMale

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Posts
3,055
Media
35
Likes
5,477
Points
468
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
To all the people quoting statistics: That's assuming that one actually does exist.

So the statistics are saying in essence, "If one were to exist, this would be the percentage that it does."

It's like lottery statistics, "If someone were to win the lottery, this would be the percentage chance that they do."

It's still very possible that no one wins. Just like it's still pretty improbable that someone has 10 ruler straight inches of cock sticking out perfectly perpendicular to their body. Most cocks that even reach the 9"+ range only due so because of major downward curvature.
 
Last edited:
1

185248

Guest
She held the tape at 3". I'm not sure if it is even a vintage vid.
 

ConanTheBarber

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Posts
5,306
Media
0
Likes
2,087
Points
258
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
This is true. However, I assumed the change in size from one generation to the next would be negligible. My assumption is that every current living generation of males fit (will/did fit) the current data, regardless of their age.

It's possible that with improvements in nutrition, the average length took a nice upward bump in the last century or so.
We're certainly much taller than we used to be.
Longer? Dunno. Just sayin.
 

Smaccoms

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Posts
2,778
Media
7
Likes
1,466
Points
583
Age
34
Location
Massachusetts (United States)
Sexuality
No Response
It's possible that with improvements in nutrition, the average length took a nice upward bump in the last century or so.
We're certainly much taller than we used to be.
Longer? Dunno. Just sayin.

I do not see this being a very probable theory. What improvements are you referring to?
 

ConanTheBarber

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Posts
5,306
Media
0
Likes
2,087
Points
258
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
I do not see this being a very probable theory. What improvements are you referring to?
The improvements in nutrition that have occurred in the last two centuries.
One reason, many scientists say, that we are taller than we used to be.
Something demonstrated when we find that immigrants to more affluent countries are, on average, taller than the people in their home country.
(This is not so evident now because more of the world's people are receiving good nutrition.)
A greater range of food and therefore nutrients, more food, etc.
I think this sort of thing is mentioned quite often.
 

Smaccoms

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Posts
2,778
Media
7
Likes
1,466
Points
583
Age
34
Location
Massachusetts (United States)
Sexuality
No Response
^^^I view that as an assumption of the status of the health of body systems of various individuals. Who are we to say the state of our blood vessels while we ar ein our twenties has no impact on blood flow?
 

drabman

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
509
Media
0
Likes
109
Points
78
Location
UK
Gender
Male
To all the people quoting statistics: That's assuming that one actually does exist.

So the statistics are saying in essence, "If one were to exist, this would be the percentage that it does."

It's like lottery statistics, "If someone were to win the lottery, this would be the percentage chance that they do."...

That's not correct. The statistics are saying what they purport to say - i.e that although we have no direct statistics that demonstrate the frequency of x occurring, from the available information we can logically deduce that the probability of x occuring is y%. That is not the same as the examples you gave, which appear to be considering events that have already taken place, unless I've misunderstood - i.e you are considering someone who actually wins the lottery. The probability of something existing or occurring is 100% if it actually does exist or occur.

It's still very possible that no one wins. Just like it's still pretty improbable that someone has 10 ruler straight inches of cock sticking out perfectly perpendicular to their body. Most cocks that even reach the 9"+ range only due so because of major downward curvature.

True. Although I would say that even cocks that reach 9" by this definition are staggeringly rare.
 

drabman

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
509
Media
0
Likes
109
Points
78
Location
UK
Gender
Male
BTW, I don't believe the guy is even 9", although it's difficult to tell. However I suspect that the girl is very small - she certainly appears to be slight. (It seems that they knew big-dick porn tricks even in the olden days). Remember that in the real world a legit 8" NBP is enormous and would probably look freakish alongside a very petite girl.
 

drabman

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
509
Media
0
Likes
109
Points
78
Location
UK
Gender
Male
been here years..I get so tired of this silliness....the biggest guys on this site are around 10" or 11" are there bigger? possibly but no one to my knowledge here has ever produced a undoctored pic proving as such.As for the arguement that dicks that huge dont exist..let me say there must be guys like our own Bignlong and guys hung like Tony duncan who are approaching it. That said this is getting way old..lol

I haven't seen anyone on this site produce an undoctored pic showing 10". I certainly don't believe Tony Duncan is that size. Shannon once produced a very interesting pic which suggests that he's closer to 8" than 10".