You are about to get attacked LMFAOO GOODLUCK!So did he post any naked pics?
You are about to get attacked LMFAOO GOODLUCK!So did he post any naked pics?
Why ahahYou are about to get attacked LMFAOO GOODLUCK!
Nothing at all besides a butt pic and talkingno shade i dont want to look thru 60+ pages so is anything here?
Moral of the story, he’s a scammer. He’ll lock the pic for an outrageous price $60-200 and then it’s not what he says it is. “Hanging out stroking”= him touching his thigh sitting by the pool with no shirt onWhy ahah
This is why I just don't understand the guys in this thread defending him. It's the false advertising and misdirection, not the prices, that get me.Moral of the story, he’s a scammer. He’ll lock the pic for an outrageous price $60-200 and then it’s not what he says it is. “Hanging out stroking”= him touching his thigh sitting by the pool with no shirt on
Nothing except people complaining about the priceno shade i dont want to look thru 60+ pages so is anything here?
This is why I just don't understand the guys in this thread defending him. It's the false advertising and misdirection, not the prices, that get me.
If, for example, you say '$200 for a pic of my dick', I think its within reason to assume it will be a picture of the actual dick. People can then decide whether they want to pay $200 for that with their eyes open. But it's at best misleading - though mostly intentional false advertising - if said pictures ends up being your bulge through your underwear and I struggle to see how that is not deception.
This is why I just don't understand the guys in this thread defending him. It's the false advertising and misdirection, not the prices, that get me.
If, for example, you say '$200 for a pic of my dick', I think its within reason to assume it will be a picture of the actual dick. People can then decide whether they want to pay $200 for that with their eyes open. But it's at best misleading - though mostly intentional false advertising - if said pictures ends up being your bulge through your underwear and I struggle to see how that is not deception.
Amused by some of the people who liked this post since their criticisms have always included the price. I have said before that I think he is scamming people by misleading them about what they are buying, but I have "defended" him about the prices. It's his body, he can set whatever ridiculous price he wants to. I haven't seen a single comment defending his misleading people. I might have missed it, but what I've seen is only people defending the prices.This is why I just don't understand the guys in this thread defending him. It's the false advertising and misdirection, not the prices, that get me.
If, for example, you say '$200 for a pic of my dick', I think its within reason to assume it will be a picture of the actual dick. People can then decide whether they want to pay $200 for that with their eyes open. But it's at best misleading - though mostly intentional false advertising - if said pictures ends up being your bulge through your underwear and I struggle to see how that is not deception.
Not sure what video? If you mean a video on his onlyfans, then yes you have to pay. If you mean a video on this thread, then no you do not. When the time ends on a 3 or a 7 (like 12:03 or 12:07), if you refresh the page with the video on, it will become playable.How can you watch that video ? Do you have to pay ? Please explain haha
I agree with you that he can charge whatever he wants as it's his body. That said, I don't see how you can untangle the price from the fact he's scamming. Maybe price is the wrong word, it's not really about the number itself but about the value. If he was making custom videos for each person then I imagine you would have fewer people complaining about it being X amount of dollars. It's the fact he's charging above the 'market' level and then, not only delivering less compared to his peers, but also less compared to even what he said its as going to be.Amused by some of the people who liked this post since their criticisms have always included the price. I have said before that I think he is scamming people by misleading them about what they are buying, but I have "defended" him about the prices. It's his body, he can set whatever ridiculous price he wants to. I haven't seen a single comment defending his misleading people. I might have missed it, but what I've seen is only people defending the prices.
BTW, I also think the prices are incredibly high and I would never pay it; that doesn't mean I'm entitled to demand he changes it.
people have haggled and bartered prices for thousands of years. his prices are so high above market value that they are indefensible. and the price is an inherent part of the trickery.Amused by some of the people who liked this post since their criticisms have always included the price. I have said before that I think he is scamming people by misleading them about what they are buying, but I have "defended" him about the prices. It's his body, he can set whatever ridiculous price he wants to. I haven't seen a single comment defending his misleading people. I might have missed it, but what I've seen is only people defending the prices.
BTW, I also think the prices are incredibly high and I would never pay it; that doesn't mean I'm entitled to demand he changes it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.