Aaron Johnson

About the movie where he showed his dick:
I'm pretty sure it's a prosthetic one. :(

I'm an SF makeup artist and the way it moves and stretches is just like a deadened silicone prosthetic. The balls are stretching too much. Sure, balls are stretchy, but not to this extent. They are too snappy too, real balls wouldn't stretch and spring back into shape that way like a rubber band, like his supposed balls does.

Also it's supposed to be a soft dick, but the glans is a more rich red color and the veins are very visible, as if it's molded and painted after a hard dick. Soft dicks doesn't look like they are completely pumped up and filled with blood and the veins are more subtle when soft.

The balls are too light in color too, they should be darker or more red in color.

Another thing is that the penis is cut, that means the skin on the glans would be thicker due to friction. Thicker skin means you can't see the blood as much through it. Uncut penises usually have a paler glans and won't look this rich red in color, especially not when they are soft. :(
 
About the movie where he showed his dick:
I'm pretty sure it's a prosthetic one. :(

I'm an SF makeup artist and the way it moves and stretches is just like a deadened silicone prosthetic. The balls are stretching too much. Sure, balls are stretchy, but not to this extent. They are too snappy too, real balls wouldn't stretch and spring back into shape that way like a rubber band, like his supposed balls does.

Also it's supposed to be a soft dick, but the glans is a more rich red color and the veins are very visible, as if it's molded and painted after a hard dick. Soft dicks doesn't look like they are completely pumped up and filled with blood and the veins are more subtle when soft.

The balls are too light in color too, they should be darker or more red in color.

Another thing is that the penis is cut, that means the skin on the glans would be thicker due to friction. Thicker skin means you can't see the blood as much through it. Uncut penises usually have a paler glans and won't look this rich red in color, especially not when they are soft. :(
OMG, are you PhD in dicks?
 
OMG, are you PhD in dicks?
No, but all the courses and anatomy studies I have done for FX makeup (including medical prosthetics) has taught me a lot about the colors and behaviour of skin in various conditions haha

And as someone who works a lot with silicone I know how it behaves and I'm very confident that the dick isn't real :(

Here is a video of what deadener does to silicone and the behaviour in some of the samples is very similar to the dick:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Platsil gel 25 with deadener is what most fx makeup artists use, it's the most common silicone used in movie production
 
Has he ever acknowledged his gay fans or the LGBT community in any way? Because imagine with so many gay guys thirsting over him and he ends up being homophobic lol

So you are just going into multiple threads asking/or stating that someone might be potentially homophobic?
 
About the movie where he showed his dick:
I'm pretty sure it's a prosthetic one. :(

I'm an SF makeup artist and the way it moves and stretches is just like a deadened silicone prosthetic. The balls are stretching too much. Sure, balls are stretchy, but not to this extent. They are too snappy too, real balls wouldn't stretch and spring back into shape that way like a rubber band, like his supposed balls does.

Also it's supposed to be a soft dick, but the glans is a more rich red color and the veins are very visible, as if it's molded and painted after a hard dick. Soft dicks doesn't look like they are completely pumped up and filled with blood and the veins are more subtle when soft.

The balls are too light in color too, they should be darker or more red in color.

Another thing is that the penis is cut, that means the skin on the glans would be thicker due to friction. Thicker skin means you can't see the blood as much through it. Uncut penises usually have a paler glans and won't look this rich red in color, especially not when they are soft. :(

I don't even know why I am responding to this but this is the only movie ever to use the most realistic prosthetic and all the other ones use awful ones?
 
I don't even know why I am responding to this but this is the only movie ever to use the most realistic prosthetic and all the other ones use awful ones?
I notice most people on these threads love to insult the person they're gooning over as if that somehow makes them superior. It's a very "pulling the pigtails on a playground" kind of feeling.

My guess is all the people on this thread hate the idea that this man could very realistically have a decently sized penis (it's not even like porn size shaped). So they have to go insane with their conspiracy theories. It's like how in the Tom Holland thread there were dozens of people refusing to believe that it was Tom in the Yelena sauna scene and had to be a buff stunt double. Even though we saw he is just as buff in other scenes in the film.