Tuxedo Mask 4 Masc
Superior Member
Prince WHAT?Alexander Skarsgård backstage at Prince Faggot play in NYC
View attachment 192586751View attachment 192586781
View attachment 192586031
Prince WHAT?Alexander Skarsgård backstage at Prince Faggot play in NYC
View attachment 192586751View attachment 192586781
View attachment 192586031
A hit play written by Brandon Flynn's husbandPrince WHAT?
But we’ve already knew. We know men, at least some of us do, who have had sex with him. He’s old now. The gay community needs to do better. We are better. We aren’t benefiting from being gay when everybody wants gay men.Let's just be happy he has come out.
You’re missing the point. Plus not everybody likes attractive man. If we just show the same thing all the time then there’s no diversity.Gay men generally want to see attractive men just like straight men want to see attractive women. I'm not talking supermodels but generally attractive. It's human nature. This new generation of constantly needing 'everything but the kitchen sink' representation is so forced & phony. Forced inclusion is one of the reasons the LGBT has become such a joke over the past few years.
I'm pretty sure that Billy Eichner's abrasive personality and massive ego cost him a lot more support from our community than his looks did.That’s why we should have supported Billy eichner more. We need to tell the stories of gay people whether they’re pretty or ugly.
At this point, I shouldn’t be surprised when every single LPSG thread devolves into pointless, petty infighting, but here we are. I just want to see pictures and videos of Alexander Skarsgard, preferably in some state of undress. Is that too much to ask?
he's probably got the same personality as his character in Bros hadI'm pretty sure that Billy Eichner's abrasive personality and massive ego cost him a lot more support from our community than his looks did.
That’s part of being gay.I'm pretty sure that Billy Eichner's abrasive personality and massive ego cost him a lot more support from our community than his looks did.
He just meant his (i.e. the actor's) past is irrelevant - it should be read with the previous line. Theoretically, whether he had been with men or women etc is irrelevant. . He is straight with a kid, but his background is irrelevant/an actor's background is irrelevant - that's how i understand it.Did he just come out as bi?
Case closed. He didn't came out.He just meant his (i.e. the actor's) past is irrelevant - it should be read with the previous line. Theoretically, whether he had been with men or women etc is irrelevant. . He is straight with a kid, but his background is irrelevant/an actor's background is irrelevant - that's how i understand it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.