Antonio Biaggi AIDS

Charlemange

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Posts
357
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
173
Location
My Dark Paradise
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I just started watching some of his videos a month or so ago but I read in the comments that he retired because He has aids, I just wanted to know if he had AIDS and if he was retired
 
I am not certain about a diagnosis of AIDS but highly likely considering he is doing a lot of breed me raw movies now thus he is not retired from the industry
 
I'd hate to hear that, I enjoy watching him work. But I do prefer if he were protected doing it.
 
Are you asking if he is HIV+ and if his T Cells have been measured below the level that would trigger a diagnosis of AIDS?


Thanks Tom for asking that question! It seems that the people who go on and on about the dangers of barebacking don't know the difference between being HIV+ and AIDS.
 
When he first came out I liked his videos but now his videos are a complete a turnoff. I hope for his sake him having HIV is not true.

Completely agree. I just assume that everyone who is making bareback porn is HIV+ and figured we all assumed that. Well, with the possible exception of those Eastern European boys.

Put it this way, if you're working for one of the major US bareback companies you're positive, I'd assume.
 
This is utter nonsense. The bareback porn studios test their models regularly and would never risk putting a poz partner with a neg partner. On Antonio's FB page, he says he's doing a new shoot next week. He's healthy and not retired.
 
On the treasure island media site, they clearly admit to having sex partners that are poz and neg. If you audition to be on the site they ask if you considered fucking sucking or being fucked or sucked by someone.known to.be poz.
 
I lived for a number of years in Palm Springs California. I left that area permanently in 2008. One of our roommates was in fact HIV sero-positive and did not have an automobile or drive. I can tell you that there were many familiar faces at the same MD's offices and they were HIV specialists. Many of those faces were at the time working in that industry. I can tell you also that we were good friends with many men who were either still working or retired from tenure in that area of the entertainment biz. A few of the more famous ones were dealing with a great deal more than HIV, and these men were still in demand and receiving offers. Most of those that I knew declined these offers repeatedly. The business is not a nice business and while some production companies insist on good precautions and care, there are others who do not. Safety with STD's in the porn industry is possible in some cases in others it is not because of the transmission routes of the infectious agents. I have nothing against porn in any manner, but if I were looking at doing this I would want to meet and have some real conversation time with any actor with which I would be having sex, and that is for certain. If I were in that position, I would not trust what some studio person said, I would want to hear it from the actor himself because that has legal teeth.
 
I own his Yahoo group and keep up on his personal blog and news about him. I have read nothing leading me to believe he is HIV+. I have spoken with him and as I mentioned, read about him often. He seems to be a very upfront and honest individual. I truly believe if this was te case he would share the information. His life really is an open book. His Facebook page also reveals quite a bit about his personal life.

Yahoo! Groups
 
Thanks Tom for asking that question! It seems that the people who go on and on about the dangers of barebacking don't know the difference between being HIV+ and AIDS.

I don't see a real difference when both can transmit the virus.
 
It never ceases to amaze me that people assume just because you bareback means you will be HIV+. Two people who are HIV- can fuck till the cows come home and not become +. do some reasearch guys!

don't even tell me that guys who ONLY or mostly do BB sex and mostly with casual partners.... including the porn industry... even if they are tested...consider themselves negative...hahahhaha
what a bullshit!

EVERY TIME you are about to have unprotected sex (even oral) with ANY PARTNER, even your hubby... you should be aware that you might be making love to the HIV poz person... if you are fine with that- OK!
but stop bullshitting that if 2 hiv neg people have sex they can't become pozitive.....hahahahha if you tested them repeatedly and put them on a deserted island...I agree...
but c'mon guys can't be that naive!
 
I don't see a real difference when both can transmit the virus.

It's very relevant. A diagnosis of AIDS would indicate that he is not healthy at all- that his T Cells have fallen below a certain level (200 usually), indicating a severely compromised immune system. Being HIV+ merely says that blood tests have detected the HIV antibodies in your blood, at which point further tests are done to determine your immune strength and the numbers of viral copies. Many HIV+ people are very much more healthy than many HIV- people- but it would be unlikely that someone with AIDS is healthy at all.

Neither is it actually relevant to what the OP was asking. It's nitpicking for the sake of it, really.

Yes, it is VERY relevant. If Antonio was simply HIV+, then we could safely say "No" to the question- we would be telling the truth, but I doubt the OP is educated enough to where he would be satisfied with that answer.