average or small?
- Thread starter mexicanamerican
- Start date
You look longer than average, but skinny,(my opinion is skewed by my own thickness though) what are your measurements?
seterwind
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2005
- Posts
- 212
- Media
- 6
- Likes
- 8
- Points
- 163
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Sexuality
- 69% Straight, 31% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Give the only reference is his thumb, and looking at the average width of the male thumb is .75 inch. And using photoshop he is about 8 1/4 thumbs which to use math means he is 6.2 in length.
The length of his thumb can be argued but again giving the average size of a thumb to be 3 inches and his length is about 3/5ths of his thumb, I assume that mease diamater wise he is 1.8 inches. Which get the general circumference, 1.8 x 3.141592653589793 (pie) = 5.65 inch.
Given it's not a perfect circle I would say girth wise he is 5.35.
Final
Length = 6.2
Girth = 5.35
So you are above average, not very well hung but still pretty nice. No women would complain (save for size queens) and some may even give a bit of a gasped look.
Next time post a comparison shot.
The length of his thumb can be argued but again giving the average size of a thumb to be 3 inches and his length is about 3/5ths of his thumb, I assume that mease diamater wise he is 1.8 inches. Which get the general circumference, 1.8 x 3.141592653589793 (pie) = 5.65 inch.
Given it's not a perfect circle I would say girth wise he is 5.35.
Final
Length = 6.2
Girth = 5.35
So you are above average, not very well hung but still pretty nice. No women would complain (save for size queens) and some may even give a bit of a gasped look.
Next time post a comparison shot.
confusedman
Experimental Member
i would say that you are 6.2" bpel which is a little above average but definitely in the average area.there are many guys bigger than you and smaller also.the girth seems to me as 5" and the thickest point maybe 5.3"-5.5".it's not that great but there are nice starting stats to begin PE 
You know what's really strange?
When I first saw his picture, I realized it looked exactly like mine...veins and all. His just looks darker. After you did that math, that's almost exactly MY size. When I get the chance, I'm going to take a pic like that and prove that me and this guy have an identical looking penis, except his is darker while mine is lighter...but even the head, veins, size (according to what you said). Wow.
seterwind
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2005
- Posts
- 212
- Media
- 6
- Likes
- 8
- Points
- 163
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Sexuality
- 69% Straight, 31% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Long&Thick
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 265
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 7
- Points
- 163
- Location
- Cincinnati, Ohio
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Honestly I'd say your both average. However to the OP, like the veins, makes it look like its strong lol.
Yeah, I know. Average range. There's no way we could be considered "hung", but we ARE above the typical "average" size of 5.5-6", even if it's just by a little bit. It's like how a 7 3/4" penis technically isn't "well hung" as it it's the 7 range (and "well hung" is generally said to be 8+) but in reality it is well hung by anyones standards. All I know is that even though I'm average, I'm on the better end of it and most girls are satisfied by this, which is fine by me!
This actually reminds me of the "grey area" thread that was created yesterday, where someone asked what 6.5"x5.5" would be considered and why no one ever claims it. I think everyone that size or a bit over it just consider themselves 7", which would be easy to believe. We're all just rounding here really, I don't think many are EXACTLY on the inch (or half inch) they claim in their stats.
Similar threads
