Bigger

Originally posted by madame_zora@May 3 2005, 04:12 PM
DMW, do you think we could post a FAQ to list the things we've come to commonly agree on here so we could stop rehashing the same three or four boring notions ad nauseum? It's really starting to feel like spam.
[post=307589]Quoted post[/post]​
It is the new people. They come in and haven't read the old posts. I agree. I wish we had a catalog of topics with the ability to surf the old posts. It would be great. There are some old posts that I have wanted to reread, but I can't remember the thread, date etc. I would use it myself.

Any ideas on how to do that efficiently?
 
Originally posted by madame_zora@May 3 2005, 09:12 PM
DMW, do you think we could post a FAQ to list the things we've come to commonly agree on here so we could stop rehashing the same three or four boring notions ad nauseum?

You say that like you think a newbie might actually read it. Silly Jana!
 
The correlation would seem to involve two epigenetic effects:

Penis size is relative to nutritional factors.
Body size is relative to nutritional factors

However, genes can cause differences in both. No amount of calcium, essential amino acids, or carbs can make a pygmy child the same stature as anyone else as an adult.
 
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper+May 4 2005, 04:21 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DoubleMeatWhopper &#064; May 4 2005, 04:21 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@May 3 2005, 09:12 PM
DMW, do you think we could post a FAQ to list the things we&#39;ve come to commonly agree on here so we could stop rehashing the same three or four boring notions ad nauseum?

You say that like you think a newbie might actually read it. Silly Jana&#33;
[post=307739]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]


Well if we posted it as required reading to join and put up a pic of you next to it, they might&#33; Okay, I&#39;ll shut up now.
 
gamma_phi: If I may. I am a black man, and I can say that not all black men are huge. It can probably be said that historically, black men MAY have been larger than most, but surely that can be debatable. With all the cross breeding during and after slavery years, genetics would have caused the black man&#39;s penis to definitely shrink - IF AND ONLY IF black men&#39;s penises were larger than the rest of the world&#33; I am in no way huge - I don&#39;t even consider it big really. But I have seen other penises and I did turn out to be larger than the ones I&#39;ve seen. That in itself could be a case of genetics and mother nature playing it&#39;s part. We really don&#39;t know, but it makes for good conversation.

And sickboy, I&#39;m not sure about 80% of AA having european ancestry - the numbers are definitely high, but I&#39;m not sure about the 80%. If so, show me a compelling statistc done by a credible firm/research agency.

That&#39;s my story, which i&#39;m sticking to.
 
That iff (Yes, "iff" is a real word.) is very important. The stereotype originally, back in the days of ancient Greece, applied to Ethiopians. Ethiopians ain&#39;t exactly from the same part of Africa.

The issue is also threefold:

1) Is it true, or was it just a way to make the Greeks feel superior? (They felt a large penis meant a man was ruled by his animal passions and not by his rational mind.)
2) If it is true, does it apply to all Africans? I mean, Ethiopians also have a more aquiline nose.
3) If both of these are true, then is it still true relative to the rest of the world, or just to Greece? I mean, the Greeks didn&#39;t map the entire world.
 
I&#39;m SO With Zora on the "tired of debunking the same old nonsense" couch. Maybe it can be a disclaimer like the one in front of the photo album.


*Snuggles up next to Jana*

mmmMMMMmmmm