Charlie puth

You felt the need to defend him from what you think are vile accusations when you wouldn't even give it a second thought if ppl were assuming that he's straight. why is one wrong and the other ok?

This is insane shit, man.
 
You felt the need to defend him from what you think are vile accusations when you wouldn't even give it a second thought if ppl were assuming that he's straight. why is one wrong and the other ok?
Get a grip.
 
just say you're queerphobic and go.
LMFAO, what?

The other poster was saying that straight men, especially celebrities who know their sex appeal, do shit like this all the time to titillate their audience and that it doesn't automatically imply that they are queer identifying of any kind. He very well could be, but he very well could not be. That's the point.
 
LMFAO, what?

The other poster was saying that straight men, especially celebrities who know their sex appeal, do shit like this all the time to titillate their audience and that it doesn't automatically imply that they are queer identifying of any kind. He very well could be, but he very well could not be. That's the point.
You can't gaslight me sir. You really tried it. :joy: If that's all he said, then your comment would be true. But it's not. :sob: What you forgot to add in your unfortunate comment is that he said our thinking is "retrograde." Why did you conveniently leave that part out, hmm? It's because you agree with him, isn't it? And yet you're framing yourself as an impartial mediator in our discussion. You're not slick. You're really not. What you're doing is incredibly evil. He did not mean to say "he very well could be, but he very well could not be" queer. He clearly stated that we are regressive people who are dumber than 13 year olds for thinking a man eating a banana in a sexually suggestive manner could ever be queer. If you were a higher level thinker such as myself then you would be able to see this. But unfortunately not everyone is gifted, so I'll forgive you for wasting my time.
 
You can't gaslight me sir. You really tried it. :joy: If that's all he said, then your comment would be true. But it's not. :sob: What you forgot to add in your unfortunate comment is that he said our thinking is "retrograde." Why did you conveniently leave that part out, hmm? It's because you agree with him, isn't it? And yet you're framing yourself as an impartial mediator in our discussion. You're not slick. You're really not. What you're doing is incredibly evil. He did not mean to say "he very well could be, but he very well could not be" queer. He clearly stated that we are regressive people who are dumber than 13 year olds for thinking a man eating a banana in a sexually suggestive manner could ever be queer. If you were a higher level thinker such as myself then you would be able to see this. But unfortunately not everyone is gifted, so I'll forgive you for wasting my time.
you’re just trying to start things atp bc what??
 
You can't gaslight me sir. You really tried it. :joy: If that's all he said, then your comment would be true. But it's not. :sob: What you forgot to add in your unfortunate comment is that he said our thinking is "retrograde." Why did you conveniently leave that part out, hmm? It's because you agree with him, isn't it? And yet you're framing yourself as an impartial mediator in our discussion. You're not slick. You're really not. What you're doing is incredibly evil. He did not mean to say "he very well could be, but he very well could not be" queer. He clearly stated that we are regressive people who are dumber than 13 year olds for thinking a man eating a banana in a sexually suggestive manner could ever be queer. If you were a higher level thinker such as myself then you would be able to see this. But unfortunately not everyone is gifted, so I'll forgive you for wasting my time.
Thank you for giving me the biggest laugh I’ve had all day. I’ll put you on Ignore now and go back to enjoying Charlie. Have a blessed day, beloved!
 
You can't gaslight me sir. You really tried it. :joy: If that's all he said, then your comment would be true. But it's not. :sob: What you forgot to add in your unfortunate comment is that he said our thinking is "retrograde." Why did you conveniently leave that part out, hmm? It's because you agree with him, isn't it? And yet you're framing yourself as an impartial mediator in our discussion. You're not slick. You're really not. What you're doing is incredibly evil. He did not mean to say "he very well could be, but he very well could not be" queer. He clearly stated that we are regressive people who are dumber than 13 year olds for thinking a man eating a banana in a sexually suggestive manner could ever be queer. If you were a higher level thinker such as myself then you would be able to see this. But unfortunately not everyone is gifted, so I'll forgive you for wasting my time.
baby it’s really not that deep.
 
Thank you for giving me the biggest laugh I’ve had all day. I’ll put you on Ignore now and go back to enjoying Charlie. Have a blessed day, beloved!
That was the intended outcome of my high IQ post. Now I have one less messy bottom in my mentions.
 
First queerphobia, now ableism. Even if I were insane, is it right to refer to a mentally ill person as an "it"? You people are truly evil. Lay bare your true colors for all to see.