You can't gaslight me sir. You really tried it.

If that's all he said, then your comment would be true. But it's not.

What you forgot to add in your unfortunate comment is that he said our thinking is "retrograde." Why did you conveniently leave that part out, hmm? It's because you agree with him, isn't it? And yet you're framing yourself as an impartial mediator in our discussion. You're not slick. You're really not. What you're doing is incredibly evil. He did not mean to say "he very well could be, but he very well could not be" queer. He clearly stated that we are regressive people who are dumber than 13 year olds for thinking a man eating a banana in a sexually suggestive manner could ever be queer. If you were a higher level thinker such as myself then you would be able to see this. But unfortunately not everyone is gifted, so I'll forgive you for wasting my time.