Chris Evans

dong-in-khakis

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Posts
1,646
Media
0
Likes
494
Points
208
Location
southern USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Hope there's not a post about this I missed, but what about it.. Fake?

It's not hard to believe he'd do it, but if he did, it leaking out into public. Whatever the case, you know he knows the public is dying to know what's below his belt. If he did it, he just might have let it leak.. lol.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

dong-in-khakis

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Posts
1,646
Media
0
Likes
494
Points
208
Location
southern USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
yeah, when I first saw it that's what I thought.. wishful thinking. Most fakes of celebs are usually large or long, but this could be actual.

Whatever he's got I'm sure it looks good..
 
Last edited:

92philip

Loved Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
215
Media
79
Likes
657
Points
133
Location
california
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
I think it's real. THe body type in the picture is exactly like his in real life. And the dick is big enough to be above average, yet not so huge that it is impossible. Plus the image is of pretty decent quality. Decent enough to be real.
 

dong-in-khakis

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Posts
1,646
Media
0
Likes
494
Points
208
Location
southern USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
again, that is what I thought. The cock could have been photoshopped I guess, but the overall image is decent enought to look real. The face and body type are identical. There doesn't seem to be any give away signs of photoshopping.

That's what makes me wonder if it is real and is a leak out.
 
6

640955

Guest
Thats one Great cock on "him" for sure. Cool pic but def fake.
 

lpsgjwalker

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Posts
114
Media
0
Likes
47
Points
248
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Hope there's not a post about this I missed, but what about it.. Fake?

It's not hard to believe he'd do it, but if he did, it leaking out into public. Whatever the case, you know he knows the public is dying to know what's below his belt. If he did it, he just might have let it leak.. lol.

Face is Photoshopped (cloned) onto an existing photo - face / features are too large for the head.
 

Gabriel

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Posts
152
Media
3
Likes
153
Points
263
Location
Everywhere
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
I, too, stumbled across this picture, only it was a lot smaller. When it was scaled down, it looked incredibly believable. But this large version is a clear fake. And it's not even a "really good fake," lol. Unless the other fakes are just completely and totally horrendous and done in Microsoft Paint.

The difference in overall lighting of his face and body is a dead giveaway, not to mention the fact that his head is HUGE compared to his body. He looks like a bobblehead. Add on the obvious liquify/smudge evidence along his shoulder/deltoid/trapezius, and you've got one compelling case against this picture's credibility.
 

dong-in-khakis

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Posts
1,646
Media
0
Likes
494
Points
208
Location
southern USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I saw an article somewhere on the internet about the mentioned photo, stating that it was an unintentional "leak" by Chris Evans.

You never know though, the more I think about it the more I think it is just a really good fake. For some reason I never thought the guy was that long. Seems most fakes you see of celebs are ususally quite large.