Chris pratt

VPL alert!
OK, I have nothing against a bit of Photoshopping. Crows feet erased here...boobs made a bit perkier there.
But Esquire magazine needs to be bitchslapped for almost completely Photoshopping Mr. Pratt's VPL out of their 9/14 cover photo!
Photo 1: The magazine cover.
Photo 2: the original undoctored photo.
Whoomp - there it is! ...and it ain't there in the magazine cover version.
PS - Anyone who can find a substantially larger version of the undoctored before photo will be a candidate for sainthood.
:innocent:

View attachment 11734021

View attachment 11734031

View attachment 11734061
Do y'all have superpowers that help you see VPLs cuz I swear %90 times I can't see a VPL on the photos posted here as "clear VPL photos" lol.
 
Do y'all have superpowers that help you see VPLs cuz I swear %90 times I can't see a VPL on the photos posted here as "clear VPL photos" lol.
My thought too, it just looks like they’ve removed the shadow from his inner thigh that makes the slight bulge less prominent. There’s a bit of bulge, nowhere near a VPL
 
  • Like
Reactions: sisterbroadway
I'm sorry I just don't think there's much there. I think he's average maybe smaller than average probably fun in bed though
I think he could be big just not monstrous. But most of all, whatever his length is, I get the vibe that he’s uber-thick like from 6-7 in girth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joeexotic333
Does anyone have his nudes? There's a twitter user claiming he has nudes.
There's always someone claiming to have nudes, purely to up replies to their own post. If Mr Pratt has ever sent this person a pic then chances are he would have sent them before and after to other people, so there would be more evidence out there....me thinks. Unless this was the one and only time and he was unfortunate to send them to someone with the morals of bellybutton lint to hawk around the Web. That said, if they do exist I'd probably be the first to blow over them