Chris Walsh

Status
Not open for further replies.
He’s definitely older than that. I remember him on Instagram back in 2016/7 and he wasn’t 13 hahaha.

I don’t know his age but if I had to estimate I’d say 25-27
hahaha... that'd be crazy. lol yea that makes more sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted6900961
Agreed he’s definitely still very sexy, more so in some ways. I just wish we had more revealing photos like he’s been posting recently from back the.
 
It's crazy how his Twitter posts are pretty much exactly like his OF posts at this point, and more frequent. Not much more to see on it unless you can convince him to actually reply to you and sell you old, over priced nudes that aren't even taken with the effort that he puts into his public pics.
He sets up his camera and lighting for Twitter pics, but all his OF and paid stuff is just quickly taken mirror phone pics with his face blocked or cut out.
 
It's crazy how his Twitter posts are pretty much exactly like his OF posts at this point, and more frequent. Not much more to see on it unless you can convince him to actually reply to you and sell you old, over priced nudes that aren't even taken with the effort that he puts into his public pics.
He sets up his camera and lighting for Twitter pics, but all his OF and paid stuff is just quickly taken mirror phone pics with his face blocked or cut out.
His onlyfans has been a scan since day 1
 
You can't guarantee it, because you not subscribed
aside from the one cum screenshot that you posted, which yes finally has some tip I guess, and the two cum vids that don't show his dick, how is there meaningful difference between his Twitter and OF content? Both don't show his full dick, both show pics/vids of his shaft with tip hidden, both show his balls and hole. The content is basically the same, so only worth it if you want more of his Twitter. Pretty much as the person you're quoting said. Is it a scam? that's arguable. But it is not showing particularly more than his free content, that much is certain.
 
aside from the one cum screenshot that you posted, which yes finally has some tip I guess, and the two cum vids that don't show his dick, how is there meaningful difference between his Twitter and OF content? Both don't show his full dick, both show pics/vids of his shaft with tip hidden, both show his balls and hole. The content is basically the same, so only worth it if you want more of his Twitter. Pretty much as the person you're quoting said. Is it a scam? that's arguable. But it is not showing particularly more than his free content, that much is certain.
I agree with your opinion. But the problem is that Chamberoffisting accused me of publishing fake content without having any proof that it is fake content
 
Status
Not open for further replies.