circumcised vs. uncircumcised?
- Thread starter l_g_k_
- Start date
artlover20
1st Like
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Posts
- 29
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1
- Points
- 146
- Location
- New York City
- Sexuality
- 69% Gay, 31% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Prefer Uncut up to 7".... then, ANY AND ALL! LOL.
I love the natural smell... I love to play with the skin.... I like to chew on it... pulll the hood all the way up and stick my tongue in, licking underneath it. So much MORE to play with with Uncut!
I love the natural smell... I love to play with the skin.... I like to chew on it... pulll the hood all the way up and stick my tongue in, licking underneath it. So much MORE to play with with Uncut!
My wife of 6 months revealed to me a few months ago that she prefers uncut. She said they're more fun to play with. She said this all very casually. She had only one uncut lover before me, she revealed, so it was impossible not to feel compared (unfavorably) to him. She even bragged about her preference for uncut, since there's the perception that most women prefer cut. I have a hard time wishing I were uncut to please her (more), though. I like my cock. Although I have no experience with uncut ones to know if they're really "more fun".
uncircumsized. I don't think my wife even knows. As with the foreskin pulled back it is hard to tell. But oh! my it is so much more sensitive it adds so much to the pleasure of sex. The added sensitivity makes using a condom much nicer. Which I guess is why I don't object to using one. Certainly a big plus to being uncircumsized.
By specifying "always" means the answer is no. Arousal is mostly a mental process but sensitivity of the glans would be a big factor.
That's what I would expect but not always.
Well they always say the brain is the largest sex organ, but still begs the question Why?
hoodedbilad
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2007
- Posts
- 58
- Media
- 7
- Likes
- 53
- Points
- 163
- Location
- London, UK
- Sexuality
- 69% Straight, 31% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Personally, I prefer uncut. It's what we're used to here in Europe. In the UK, for example, only 5% of men are circumcised. I read somewhere that 80% of north American men are cut as infants. Can anyone tell me if this figure is accurate... seems astonishing to me!
need2bfilled
Experimental Member
i guess both have their benefits.... aesthetically, a big uncut one is a massive turnon, but I definitly prefer sucking a circumsized guy
Yeah, me too. Can you imagine all the income generated circumcising the majority of 150,000,000 males? (U.S. population surpassed 300,000,000 recently.)
You are right for U.S. males of the age of sexual maturity. As Steve says, the trend is reversing. Latest figures available (2003) infants cut in hospitals was 56%. I think he's transposed his numbers.
voyeurcurioso
Admired Member
I'm uncut but curious about this. What makes it better? Feeling? Fitting in? Not having to clean?
I was with someone the other day who pointed to a woman and said "That's the nurse who helped with my son's circumcision". Yes, an odd thing to say. But he's Jewish so it made sense in modern day Australia. I commented to a friend who was there at the time afterwards... "Now that's not a phrase you hear too often these days". I'm cut, but kinda wish I wasn't, though I doubt I'd go down the path of restoration. Doesn't seem the right thing for me.
Similar threads
