Everybody is giving their opinions on the question of cut/uncut. Frankly, does it really matter? I think there is way too much emotional energy expended on something that just isn't that important. If you are upset that you're circumcized, see a plastic surgeon. There is now a procedure that can be done to reproduce a foreskin. I don't want to criticize anyone for their opinions on the subject. Me? I'm cut. That's fine for me. Whether a man is cut or uncut isn't that important to me. Maybe some of the games played are different because of the presence or absence of a foreskin, but it's fun either way.
Circumcisions
- Thread starter Matt Cohen
- Start date
Everybody is giving their opinions on the question of cut/uncut. Frankly, does it really matter? I think there is way too much emotional energy expended on something that just isn't that important. If you are upset that you're circumcized, see a plastic surgeon. There is now a procedure that can be done to reproduce a foreskin. I don't want to criticize anyone for their opinions on the subject. Me? I'm cut. That's fine for me. Whether a man is cut or uncut isn't that important to me. Maybe some of the games played are different because of the presence or absence of a foreskin, but it's fun either way.
It's not a huge deal for men who are already circumcised. The reason it's a big deal is because it's a moral issue. Body modifications should only be done with consent. Baby's can't make decisions for themselves, and it's not right for a parent to do anything to their child. The child can make the decision on their own when they reach the right age.
1Steve
Loved Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Posts
- 1,002
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 733
- Points
- 333
- Location
- New York (United States)
- Gender
- Male
I disagree, but not for the reason you may think. I agree that circumcision done in infancy takes the decision out of the child's hands. However the procedure is painful, but the child will never remember the pain. Now don't cut the child and let him do it at adulthood, if he chooses? Unless it's for medical reasons, very few men will do it, even if they'd like too, because it's now an operation. Very young kids get their tonsils out in some areas almost as a mater of course to prevent sore throats and tonsillitis. Their parents make that choice not them. Ever had a teen told you are taking his tonsils out? He will fight you every step of the way, at the mere thought of a painful operation. So my contention is that if you don't get your child cut, you have made the choice for him all the same, as he won't do it when he's old enough if he wants it, because it then becomes a costly painful operation.
Last edited:
You're making it sound like having foreskin is like having a problem. Of course it's a painful operation. It's removing a healthy part of the body that's supposed to be there. All the reasons that most people get there children circumcised (hygiene, HIV, etc.) have all been proven false. If a person has foreskin, they're going to want to keep it because it feels good to have it. I'll just leave this here: https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net...x720/1002884_424278361025187_1592656910_n.jpg
I know this is a sensitive subject, and I hope I don't come off as sounding offensive. If I do, please forgive me. I don't want to start an argument.
NIMBUS
Superior Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2005
- Posts
- 2,561
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 2,613
- Points
- 443
- Location
- Buckinghamshire, UK
- Gender
- Male
Not in the UK. Removal of the tonsils is resisted by the National Health Service just as much as removal of the foreskin. Only when necessary (or more accurately, it will only be funded/covered by the NHS if necessary - if you've got the money to go private then you could probably find a clinic to do the job). Even then, situations change. When I was a kid I went down with tonsillitis several times every winter BUT by my teenage years I had grown out of it. What a relief that my parents weren't entrusted with the decision to have my tonsils removed (or my foreskin for that matter)!
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2009
- Posts
- 2,421
- Media
- 11
- Likes
- 2,935
- Points
- 443
- Location
- Vancouver (British Columbia, Canada)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Cutwelshboy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Posts
- 31
- Media
- 14
- Likes
- 84
- Points
- 103
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Just to echo a previous post: this thread, although about circumcision, is asking about the cut/uncut status of "celebrities". However, as is too often the case it has degenerated into the usual anti-circ/pro-circ argument. Yes, circumcision is a contentious subject and one which illicits strong opinions (especially from the anti-circ lobby), but come on people: this argument is something which will never be resolved, especially when circumcision remains the world's most commonly performed surgical procedure.
Although I am circumcised, I grew up in a society which is mostly uncut and despite being circumcised for a genuine medical reason (my phimosis was so severe that I was at real risk of renal failure); I was very self-conscious of being "different" to my peers. And yes, for a while, I too was anti-circumcision and spent the best part of my adolescence and late teens, feeling resentful at being cut.
But then I matured enough to realise, through various sexual partners and my own common sense, that there were benefits to being circumcised. I also realised that however much I wanted to kick and shout at the world, my foreskin was long gone and he wasn't coming back.
In other words, I learned to accept it and make the most of a situation of which I had no chance of changing.
Too many circumcised guys refuse to accept that they can never change what has been done to them and while I sympathise, I would respectfully suggest that counselling be a far more effective and productive method in which to vent their collective spleen; instead of dominating any circumcision thread with their, sometimes hostile, rhetoric. I understand the anger you feel fellas, but there are other forums and other opportunities to air your views (there are even organisations, such as NORM, to politically lobby for you). Respect is a two-way street.
Although I am circumcised, I grew up in a society which is mostly uncut and despite being circumcised for a genuine medical reason (my phimosis was so severe that I was at real risk of renal failure); I was very self-conscious of being "different" to my peers. And yes, for a while, I too was anti-circumcision and spent the best part of my adolescence and late teens, feeling resentful at being cut.
But then I matured enough to realise, through various sexual partners and my own common sense, that there were benefits to being circumcised. I also realised that however much I wanted to kick and shout at the world, my foreskin was long gone and he wasn't coming back.
In other words, I learned to accept it and make the most of a situation of which I had no chance of changing.
Too many circumcised guys refuse to accept that they can never change what has been done to them and while I sympathise, I would respectfully suggest that counselling be a far more effective and productive method in which to vent their collective spleen; instead of dominating any circumcision thread with their, sometimes hostile, rhetoric. I understand the anger you feel fellas, but there are other forums and other opportunities to air your views (there are even organisations, such as NORM, to politically lobby for you). Respect is a two-way street.
voyeurcurioso
Loved Member
Regarding Zac Efron, has there been proof of his status? (Admittedly, he is American, and of secular Jewish background, which does tip the scales to cut)
I've never seen a pic of his dick, but I agree his Jewish background make it more likely he's cut.
The origin for Michael Cera is someone who went to school with him and saw him after gym class in the showers. It is not too surprising as if I remember correctly his father was born in Italy and his mother is French Canadian. So I believe the report.
NO, do Not for any reason other than Cancer get Circumcised!!!
You loose 30% of your Penis feeling and a grown man's Foreskin is 3 by 5 inches when they take it OFF! Why would Any SANE person cut what GOD put there??? Stupid religious practice! NOT medical!!!
Partner had Huge foreskin and never needed lube and could cum 5 x a day at 50! Cut guys CANNOT! Foreskins are put there for a reason!!!
You loose 30% of your Penis feeling and a grown man's Foreskin is 3 by 5 inches when they take it OFF! Why would Any SANE person cut what GOD put there??? Stupid religious practice! NOT medical!!!
Partner had Huge foreskin and never needed lube and could cum 5 x a day at 50! Cut guys CANNOT! Foreskins are put there for a reason!!!
scorp
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Posts
- 191
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 30
- Points
- 53
- Location
- Kissimmee, Central, Florida
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
LOL @ ChicagoGuy I am 60 y.o. and still cum 5 times a day. And I have diabetes on top of that. There was very little truth to anything you said. I was cicumsized at birth. I have not lost any of the feeling in the head of my penis. And maybe the guy that wants to get cut is having trouble retracting his foreskin, and it becomes painful when having an erection. The only reason I wish I was not cut is purely cosmetic. I think a foreskin would be fun, but we always want what we haven't got. :redface: