But he provided the links to the original pics.As you see in its success history, this thread has become very popular and your comments are not correct as long as you don't prove what you maintain. Just saying FAKE doesn't mean anything. Maybe it's just fake for your eyes but not for others. When you can give a source or a pic with other dimensions for comparison then you would add a proof for your suspicion. Otherwise it's just a statement and nothing else. Thanks!
But he provided the links to the original pics.
I agree. I quoted your entire post by mistake, instead of only the third pic (for which I posted the original source). The first two are probably real. Is it possible to edit posts? I could not find any edit button.When you can give a source or a pic with other dimensions for comparison then you would add a proof for your suspicion. Otherwise it's just a statement and nothing else. Thanks!
Ok, then I am with you. That one with the proof is accepted, the other ones I don't doubt to be real. Thanks for your reply. Cheers TedI agree. I quoted your entire post by mistake, instead of only the third pic (for which I posted the original source). The first two are probably real. Is it possible to edit posts? I could not find any edit button.
No, not all! But he corrected his own statement!But he provided the links to the original pics.
his cock is so huge hard and beautiful, if only I could suck him off, thanks for postingHung twink going from soft to very erect and large.
Sorry. I saw two links but am now realizing one was fact checking someone else's post.No, not all! But he corrected his own statement!
Thanks, it's ok. Cheers TedSorry. I saw two links but am now realizing one was fact checking someone else's post.
He's a whole meal..Damn!
Yeah, cute but fake...again.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.