hairyman101
Admired Member
he stated that going on stage and its chilly...that his penis and balls go up...so he looks small. that does happen.
Daniel Radcliffe
- Thread starter wat2dowit it
- Start date
jeff black
Cherished Member
And, let's add the fact that he doesn't have an erected scene in the play. I mean, growers are out there, folks(spoken as one).
AND, how many of you would be focused on maintaining a semi hard when you are in front of 10,000 people and NOT fucking them.
AND, how many of you would be focused on maintaining a semi hard when you are in front of 10,000 people and NOT fucking them.
Katiecav_34D
Experimental Member
I've watched while growing up in all the Harry Potter movies. I just read he is appearing on Broadway in Equis(sp) and that he has an actual nude seen during the play. Any information on him?
yeah... he played the role in England a short while ago. Young Harry has done growed up.
- Deno,
There is plenty of information on him, just use the search feature and you'll find plenty. It's Radcliffe. Here is a little tid bit I just found on the internet.
Daniel Radcliffe Gets Naked Again -- This Time as Harry Potter?!
by Monika Bartyzel Aug 18th 2008 // 9:03AM
Okay. I know that fandom usually leads to fanfic stories that center on a million different sexual scenarios, but what's with the Harry Potter nudity? If Ace Showbiz has it right, Daniel Radcliffe is stripping once again, but this time it isn't for a disturbing play about horses. It's for Harry Potter.
Yes, they report that the almost-20-year-old will strip down for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Radcliffe is quoted as saying: "At first I thought I'd have pants [underwear] on for the scene. Apparently not. But I've sort of done that before on stage. It's all old hat now, really."
Well, it may be old hat to him, but there are still many hordes of Harry fans who probably weren't expecting to see his ... you can guess where I'm going with this. Will audience be able to see a good bit of skin when all is said and done? That remains to be seen. While the films are getting darker, we all know that violence and darkness goes down a lot easier than some added skin, and this is still a kid-centric series.
Daniel Radcliffe Gets Naked Again -- This Time as Harry Potter?!
by Monika Bartyzel Aug 18th 2008 // 9:03AM
Okay. I know that fandom usually leads to fanfic stories that center on a million different sexual scenarios, but what's with the Harry Potter nudity? If Ace Showbiz has it right, Daniel Radcliffe is stripping once again, but this time it isn't for a disturbing play about horses. It's for Harry Potter.
Yes, they report that the almost-20-year-old will strip down for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Radcliffe is quoted as saying: "At first I thought I'd have pants [underwear] on for the scene. Apparently not. But I've sort of done that before on stage. It's all old hat now, really."
Well, it may be old hat to him, but there are still many hordes of Harry fans who probably weren't expecting to see his ... you can guess where I'm going with this. Will audience be able to see a good bit of skin when all is said and done? That remains to be seen. While the films are getting darker, we all know that violence and darkness goes down a lot easier than some added skin, and this is still a kid-centric series.
Last edited:
jeff black
Cherished Member
While the Deathly Hallows is supposed to be dark and a bit twisted.... I really don't think they will show Harry's cock. In fact, I'm betting that it's more of a case of side asscheek or soemthing.
Katiecav_34D
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2007
- Posts
- 4,022
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 18,777
- Points
- 543
- Location
- New Jersey (United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I went to see Equus a few weeks ago. I even had the great fortune of sitting in a front row center seat.
The play is wonderful. I'd seen the original production, and I have the movie on DVD, so I was familiar with the story.
Richard Griffiths plays Dr. Dysart very low key. He's fantastic in the role. Daniel throws himself headfirst into the role of Alan, and he's absolutely amazing.
The scene, just before the intermission, where Alan takes one of the horses out for a secret late night ride is something to see. The staging is such that the actor playing the horse actually runs faster & faster (without moving from center stage) as Alan's physical / mental / spiritual orgasm builds. Awesome.
As for the nudity - it's near the end of the play. I won't dignify some of the catty comments many have made regarding "Harry's wand". I'll just say Daniel is utterly magnificent. It's wonderful to see that he's left his body intact (no metrosexual body hair trimming or intrusive tattoos on THIS boy)! I also think he's a braver man than I to be doing this. I give him a lot of credit...and I recommend the play VERY highly.
The play is wonderful. I'd seen the original production, and I have the movie on DVD, so I was familiar with the story.
Richard Griffiths plays Dr. Dysart very low key. He's fantastic in the role. Daniel throws himself headfirst into the role of Alan, and he's absolutely amazing.
The scene, just before the intermission, where Alan takes one of the horses out for a secret late night ride is something to see. The staging is such that the actor playing the horse actually runs faster & faster (without moving from center stage) as Alan's physical / mental / spiritual orgasm builds. Awesome.
As for the nudity - it's near the end of the play. I won't dignify some of the catty comments many have made regarding "Harry's wand". I'll just say Daniel is utterly magnificent. It's wonderful to see that he's left his body intact (no metrosexual body hair trimming or intrusive tattoos on THIS boy)! I also think he's a braver man than I to be doing this. I give him a lot of credit...and I recommend the play VERY highly.
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Posts
- 1,154
- Media
- 5
- Likes
- 720
- Points
- 433
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Schaumburg (Illinois, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
He looks good naked, really wish he was gay..i would let him do whatever he wanted to me
RobinSF
Loved Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Posts
- 312
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 744
- Points
- 293
- Age
- 63
- Location
- San Francisco
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I agree that it does take courage for him to take on this kind of role, especially right now in his career. Good for him not to rush right into a megabucks made for him role that I am sure Hollywood has already offered him. And you are right Mickactual, nice to see a young one who goes for the natural look rather than than shaving smoother than a drag queen meeting her inlaws. And I am not sure on this, but isn't he Jewish? That would explain no tatoos if he is observant. I like him, but am not a HUGE fan, so I am unsure about his being Jewish.
And about the size thing, he could be a grower (I am). Lots of them out there! I have also met many a "shower" who looked really nice, but rather disappointed when it grew all of a 1/4 of an inch. And if he is Jewish, I've found (in totally unscientific --but damn fun doing it-- polling that Jewish men can be growers.
And about the size thing, he could be a grower (I am). Lots of them out there! I have also met many a "shower" who looked really nice, but rather disappointed when it grew all of a 1/4 of an inch. And if he is Jewish, I've found (in totally unscientific --but damn fun doing it-- polling that Jewish men can be growers.
I am quite surprised that people here cannot make the difference between a picture of a normal male while doing normal activities naked, and a porn star not fully flaccic in a pose after having pulled his penis to make it look longer.
A naked male walking in a totally non sexual setting will have a penis that looks much shorter on a picture than some male posing nude in a position that makes his penis stick out insted of recede into the pelvis.
A naked male walking in a totally non sexual setting will have a penis that looks much shorter on a picture than some male posing nude in a position that makes his penis stick out insted of recede into the pelvis.
i actually thought the black and white of him with the horse was very hot...nice size and uncut
toddnnelson
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Posts
- 50
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 5
- Points
- 93
- Location
- Fresno (California, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
ONCE AGAIN THAT PHOTO IS A FAKE EVERYONE, I JUST WISH SOMEONE WILL ZAP THAT FAKE PHOTO TO OUTER SPACE AND OFF THE WEB.
TODD
- Joined
- May 7, 2007
- Posts
- 711
- Media
- 17
- Likes
- 674
- Points
- 413
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 69% Gay, 31% Straight
- Gender
- Male
toddnnelson
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Posts
- 50
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 5
- Points
- 93
- Location
- Fresno (California, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
THERE IS NO REAL PHOTO (AT LEAST FROM THE LONDON RUN) AND YOU HAVE SEEN ABOUT 2 PICS FROM THE AMERICAN RUN OVER AND OVER AND OVER WICH WAS TAKEN DURING THE PRE SHOW RUN WICH WAS BEFORE THE OFFICAL RUN AND THERE SO FAR AS NOT BEEN ANY TAKEN OF HIS WILLIE DURING THE OFFICIAL RUN SUPPOSELY CUX SECURITY IS TIGHTER.
Similar threads
