Daniel Radcliffe
- Thread starter wat2dowit it
- Start date
You might also need to rethink this thread. Although that photo is a fake, it was taken when he was under 18 (i.e. from the first run of Equus and not the new one).
If you're going to discuss his penis or sexualise him in any way, make sure the picture that you're using to promote discussion is from when he was over 18.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Posts
- 5,827
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,618
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
- Gender
- Male
That pic is photoshopped. There is a genuine pic of another nude male in front of the horse. Someone photoshopped Daniel's head on the nude guy's body. That body below the neck is not Daniel.
This has been reported. The mods will take this under advisement. I'll not remove it right now with without consensus of the mods as the pic itself is NOT A MINOR, nor is it DANIEL.
However, in any posts you make on this thread, remember that just the face is 17. Don't make any posts with lust for Daniel WHEN Daniel was a minor.
Thanks,
Freddie
Moderator
This has been reported. The mods will take this under advisement. I'll not remove it right now with without consensus of the mods as the pic itself is NOT A MINOR, nor is it DANIEL.
However, in any posts you make on this thread, remember that just the face is 17. Don't make any posts with lust for Daniel WHEN Daniel was a minor.
Thanks,
Freddie
Moderator
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Posts
- 1,154
- Media
- 5
- Likes
- 734
- Points
- 433
- Age
- 40
- Location
- Schaumburg (Illinois, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
man the mod snapped on ur asses...be careful
Edit: After review, it was determined that the last time this fake picture appeared, the pic was removed. With that I am closing this thread.
Edit: After review, it was determined that the last time this fake picture appeared, the pic was removed. With that I am closing this thread.
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure everyone assumes the other pic going around is a fake. Here is a link of the same pic from the waist up in the NYTimes with credit given to Uli Weber of the AP.
Stable Boy - The New York Times > Theater > Slide Show > Slide 5 of 8
I would image the other pic to be real too...just cropped to protect the "innocent".
Stable Boy - The New York Times > Theater > Slide Show > Slide 5 of 8
I would image the other pic to be real too...just cropped to protect the "innocent".
- dyna,
I found this shot on a blog page - if it shows below great... if not go to:
Can't say whether i think it is fake or not. It looks pretty authentic... if so not a bad cock by all accounts! wouldn't say no for sure!
EDIT: Links to that faked picture of the underaged Radcliffe REMOVED AGAIN!!
Can't say whether i think it is fake or not. It looks pretty authentic... if so not a bad cock by all accounts! wouldn't say no for sure!
EDIT: Links to that faked picture of the underaged Radcliffe REMOVED AGAIN!!
Last edited by a moderator:
i googled one pic of him where he seemed well hung, fairly thick:
http://www.frictionradio.co.uk/custom/daniel-radcliffe-fully-nude-penis-thumb.bmp
but on these pics he looks like being on the smaller side and his balls hang a lot lower than his teeny-weeny.
EDIT: fake pic of the minor Radcliffe removed.
http://www.frictionradio.co.uk/custom/daniel-radcliffe-fully-nude-penis-thumb.bmp
but on these pics he looks like being on the smaller side and his balls hang a lot lower than his teeny-weeny.
EDIT: fake pic of the minor Radcliffe removed.
Last edited by a moderator:
that one is fake.
im hopin for higher quality pics of him on stage. but we shall see
How do we know this one is fake?
I have seen pictures of Dan a few times from waist up and it is strikingly similar. Also, those are the pics that have been floating around for quite some time.
it was ultimately lame to fake his cock for an artistic photograph of this purpose.
Go look on perez hiltons site. Someone took pictures of his peen with their cell phone during his play. He looks very average.
