Daniel Radcliffe
- Thread starter wat2dowit it
- Start date
a while ago i found the top picture of daniel radcliffe, apparently from the play equus
i was impressed by his endowment for a kid who'd only just turned 18
if you want to keep the fantasy that he's that well hung tho, don't DL the second pic as it proves the first is photoshopped in
:frown1:disappointing but doesn't mean he isn't really well hung in real life
but for some reason i can't attach the pics
i was impressed by his endowment for a kid who'd only just turned 18
if you want to keep the fantasy that he's that well hung tho, don't DL the second pic as it proves the first is photoshopped in
:frown1:disappointing but doesn't mean he isn't really well hung in real life
but for some reason i can't attach the pics
Yes, but as far as I know, it's illegal to post or view nude pictures/videos of anyone under 18. It's certainly still illegal for anyone under 18 to take part in any porn video or photo shoot.
redheadguy73
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Posts
- 112
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 28
- Points
- 248
- Location
- Chicago (Illinois, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
As is it for many (most?) states in USA.
It's LPSG rules that forbid pre-18 pics from being uploaded. The well-known, edited, pics are I/M/O "art" not porn and thus 18USC2257 doesn't apply. You can find many USA websites presenting them.
Very brave of him, I'd say. He's obviously committed to his acting art rather than showing off his dick. Unfortunately most dicks are average/small, which is disappointing when one is a bit obsessed with big tools - like me.
With regards to whether or not his pics can be posted, everyone needs to review this thread, which is a "sticky" thread and is the very first thread under the "Celebrity Endowments" forum.
http://www.lpsg.org/71926-under-18-no-no.html
Agreed. He did the play because to challenge himself as an actor and to develop his craft, not to show off how hung he is, or isn't.
http://www.lpsg.org/71926-under-18-no-no.html
Agreed. He did the play because to challenge himself as an actor and to develop his craft, not to show off how hung he is, or isn't.
Listen.
Any pictures taken during the play's run in England last year cannot be posted, since Daniel was still just 17 then.
But I heard something about him doing the play on Broadway this year, any pictures from that are fine since he's 18 now.
Any pictures taken during the play's run in England last year cannot be posted, since Daniel was still just 17 then.
But I heard something about him doing the play on Broadway this year, any pictures from that are fine since he's 18 now.
Chubby Cox
Just Browsing
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2008
- Posts
- 5
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 221
- Location
- Lakeland (Florida, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I like that one pic on Google with Mr. T strategically placed. How about the pic showing him with blonde hair and mustache?
Who want's a mustache ride?:biggrin1:
Who want's a mustache ride?:biggrin1:
D_Rock_ N_Hardon
Account Disabled
Quite Irate
Sexy Member
D_Rock_ N_Hardon
Account Disabled
At the time those pictures were taken, he was a minor in the eyes of courts having jurisdiction over LPSG (regardless of what the law in the UK says), and this is covered by 18 USC 2252 and 18 USC 2256 instead. One of the factors that courts have to decide is whether the genitals are shown in a "lascivious" manner; and previous court decisions have taken the picture's context into account -- meaning that a picture of a naked African child in National Geographic might get a pass, while the exact same picture in Hot African Uncut Dicks might not. Similarly, pictures of Daniel Radcliffe naked on stage may safely be posted at British Theatre Review, but put the Large Penis Support Group at risk.
D_Rock_ N_Hardon
Account Disabled
re: size of his dick.
If he was able to stand naked in front of a big audience and retain a small unerect penis, it means that he was very focus on his role in the play and his nakedness was not a sexual thing at all.
When you look at guys in the locker room, in the end, those with big dicks are so because they have had a few sexual thoughts that increased blood circulation to the penis, while those with smaller penis have had none. When doing sports, it is perfectly normal for the blood to flow out of the penis and go to the muscles where it is most needed.
Also consider that Radclife probably rehearsed enough that being naked is no longer an issue for him. Perhaps similar to being on a nudist beach.
Context is very important. A doctor can touch your penis and it isn't a sexual exercise. And you could have pictures of naked boys in a medical book displaying various aspects of anatomy and growth progress etc, and it isn't sexual at all.
While I respect this board's decision to not allow Radcliffe's 17yo pictures, it can be debated as an issue. For Radclife to perform naked at age 17 in the play, his parents probably had to sign some authorisation. So it was basically agreed that his naked body would become public knowledge since thousands would see it.
In this specific case, one would have very good assurance that those pictures were not taken in any "child porn" context. And there are thousands of witnesses that his naked performances were not part of any "child porn" operation.
However, one cannot prove that such pictures were not posted by someone who obtained them from some child porn site/"ring/operation (and thus would have been obtained by supporting those illegal operations).
So it is safer to block such pictures (since they are fakes anyways). What bugs me though is that despite thousands seeing him naked, there doesn't seem to be any trustable reports on whether he is circumcised or not. He supposedlay has a jewish mother, so it would be interesting to see if the tradition was continued or not.
If he was able to stand naked in front of a big audience and retain a small unerect penis, it means that he was very focus on his role in the play and his nakedness was not a sexual thing at all.
When you look at guys in the locker room, in the end, those with big dicks are so because they have had a few sexual thoughts that increased blood circulation to the penis, while those with smaller penis have had none. When doing sports, it is perfectly normal for the blood to flow out of the penis and go to the muscles where it is most needed.
Also consider that Radclife probably rehearsed enough that being naked is no longer an issue for him. Perhaps similar to being on a nudist beach.
Context is very important. A doctor can touch your penis and it isn't a sexual exercise. And you could have pictures of naked boys in a medical book displaying various aspects of anatomy and growth progress etc, and it isn't sexual at all.
While I respect this board's decision to not allow Radcliffe's 17yo pictures, it can be debated as an issue. For Radclife to perform naked at age 17 in the play, his parents probably had to sign some authorisation. So it was basically agreed that his naked body would become public knowledge since thousands would see it.
In this specific case, one would have very good assurance that those pictures were not taken in any "child porn" context. And there are thousands of witnesses that his naked performances were not part of any "child porn" operation.
However, one cannot prove that such pictures were not posted by someone who obtained them from some child porn site/"ring/operation (and thus would have been obtained by supporting those illegal operations).
So it is safer to block such pictures (since they are fakes anyways). What bugs me though is that despite thousands seeing him naked, there doesn't seem to be any trustable reports on whether he is circumcised or not. He supposedlay has a jewish mother, so it would be interesting to see if the tradition was continued or not.
