Daniel Radcliffe

It makes him too young to photograph or molest, I'll grant, but forbidding "wondering about" someone is going too far. It does not harm or endanger a minor to merely 'wonder about' him, as long as nothing passes the 'wondering' stage. Banning thoughts is too Orwellian for my tastes.

wat2dowit it's question was in bad taste, but to his credit he didn't ask for pictures or go into detail. In any case, he's only 14, but if he practices his Phallus extendum spell every night, I'm sure he'll put us all to shame by the time he's legal. :unsure:
It's WILD looking at the first few pages of old threads. I had to look up how old Daniel was at 2005. I'm glad we are better now at this but damn! Reading the first page is insane. I was 12 by then lol anyway, just wanted to share that. Not trying to get account's banned or anything.