Danny D Aka Matt Hughes

Why are you lot sat here saying he’s ugly and needs to fix his teeth? Doesn’t matter how much money he has. What work he does. If he doesn’t wanna fix his shit he doesn’t have to. Just wank to his dick or move on. Honestly. The gays wonder why they have such a stereotypical superficial image and then you read this page and it suddenly clicks. Just IMAGINE having the bollocks to think you can tell someone to fix their looks. Love to see someone you. Bet you’re not even half the site.
I don’t think he’s ugly. I think he’s very hot and sexy
 
So since both of you failed to respond to my main point, how is gay for pay different to how homophobes say people choose to be gay and that sexuality is a choice?
There is no moral, political, or philosophical depth to gay for pay. So it’s nowhere near comparable to the concepts which fuel homophobes’ idea that sexuality is a choice. Gay for pay is entirely superficial, it’s nothing more than its consumers wanting to see a hot guy get it on with another guy. I actually don’t think most porn viewers even consider the sexuality of the performers, the performers’ “sexuality” is whomever they’re having sex with in a given moment. Porn is performance, not a real-life in-depth exposé of personality, it’s all still acting.
 
There is no moral, political, or philosophical depth to gay for pay. So it’s nowhere near comparable to the concepts which fuel homophobes’ idea that sexuality is a choice. Gay for pay is entirely superficial, it’s nothing more than its consumers wanting to see a hot guy get it on with another guy. I actually don’t think most porn viewers even consider the sexuality of the performers, the performers’ “sexuality” is whomever they’re having sex with in a given moment. Porn is performance, not a real-life in-depth exposé of personality, it’s all still acting.
So you agree, they’re choosing to be gay in that moment instead of their usual straight self?

If you think Gay For Pay hasn’t had anything but a negative impact then you’re wrong. Comparing porn to regular acting is also wrong, it’s completely different.
 
So you agree, they’re choosing to be gay in that moment instead of their usual straight self?

If you think Gay For Pay hasn’t had anything but a negative impact then you’re wrong. Comparing porn to regular acting is also wrong, it’s completely different.
Gay is a sexuality. You can’t choose a sexuality. You can choose to do sex acts which are mostly associated with a sexuality, but unless that’s what really drives your own natural sex hormones then it doesn’t mean it defines your sexuality or that you chose a new sexuality. So no, I don’t agree with you. Additionally, comparing porn to regular acting is entirely comparable, both are just that, acting.

Think of it this way, some heterosexual actors have portrayed roles as transgender women. When the movie is done filming and the role is over for them, are they now transgender women? We’re they actually transgender women whilst playing that role in the movie? Did they choose to actually become a transgender woman? If they pick up more roles in the future for transgender characters, does that mean they are actually transgender? The answer to all of those questions is no. Because you can’t choose to be trans.

Gay-for-pay works the exact same way as a cisgender person performing an acting role as a transgender character. It’s a character, that’s all that’s being portrayed. Acting is acting is acting. An act is a performance, not an identity. Gay-for-pay as far as I can tell hasn’t hurt anyone or anything, I’m curious how you think it has.
 
Literally doing gay for pay isn't some form of in-depth psychological harbouring of sexuality. A lot of it is superficial. I've spoken to a lot of porn actors about their careers. Firstly, a large portion of gay for pay actors are actually gay and studios sell them as straight. Porn actors do it because it is a quick way into the industry. There is a higher demand for gay for pay actors with little restrictions (meaning looks, dick size etc...) and they'll pretty much take anyone who is straight or can be sold as straight. I spoke to two male ex-porn stars that said they were straight but doing a majority of gay porn influenced their sexuality and said they went to seek gay relationships beyond work. All in all the majority (and I spoke to 22) said they were always straight it was their gateway to porn or quick money. This was all for my dissertation and can be referenced at my uni.
 
Gay is a sexuality. You can’t choose a sexuality. You can choose to do sex acts which are mostly associated with a sexuality, but unless that’s what really drives your own natural sex hormones then it doesn’t mean it defines your sexuality or that you chose a new sexuality. So no, I don’t agree with you. Additionally, comparing porn to regular acting is entirely comparable, both are just that, acting.

Think of it this way, some heterosexual actors have portrayed roles as transgender women. When the movie is done filming and the role is over for them, are they now transgender women? We’re they actually transgender women whilst playing that role in the movie? Did they choose to actually become a transgender woman? If they pick up more roles in the future for transgender characters, does that mean they are actually transgender? The answer to all of those questions is no. Because you can’t choose to be trans.

Gay-for-pay works the exact same way as a cisgender person performing an acting role as a transgender character. It’s a character, that’s all that’s being portrayed. Acting is acting is acting. An act is a performance, not an identity. Gay-for-pay as far as I can tell hasn’t hurt anyone or anything, I’m curious how you think it has.
As a trans person, you’re wrong. Sexuality and gender identity are completely different. Obviously you’re part of the problem if you don’t see how the gay for pay archetype, which is closely linked to masc for masc (which is really MASK for MASK since a lot of it is to do with shame and people not wanting to know they’re gay.) hasn’t heavily influenced how gay men see each other.

You can use the opinions of gay for pay actors all you want, what does that prove? The experiences countless gay people have had with these types of men say differently. You’re all more than welcome to make buffoons of yourselves trying to defend them and make irrelevant comparisons to acting, because that’s totally the same as fucking and cumming inside another man’s asshole. Go ask a power bottom if he’ll fuck a woman on camera for hours just to get a small piece of change.

If you deny the fact gay for pay is toxic and those who engage in it and take of advantage of the pink cash cows for it then you need help. And I’m not talking about the fake gay for pays who use gay pornstars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nebby Nebula
As a trans person, you’re wrong. Sexuality and gender identity are completely different.
Agreed, they are completely different things. BUT, one thing they do have in common, which is the ultimate point I was making, is that they’re both things which are not chosen. And being a porn star or screen star who is just performing in an acting role which may characterize aspects of those identities doesn’t equate to that performer actually belonging those identities.

Obviously you’re part of the problem if you don’t see how the gay for pay archetype, which is closely linked to masc for masc (which is really MASK for MASK since a lot of it is to do with shame and people not wanting to know they’re gay.) hasn’t heavily influenced how gay men see each other.
Look, you don’t know me, so you don’t get to generalize me as “part of the problem”. I asked legit questions requesting clarification of how gay for pay hurts people, I never once stated that I am pro gay for pay. I could really care less how a performer wants to sell their sex. But, I also don’t think gay for pay is so prevalent as to ruin the industry. Seeing as how most performers in gay porn are actually gay or bi, not straight. So those gay and bi performers are really who define, shape, and mold the industry, not the handful of GfP guys.

Go ask a power bottom if he’ll fuck a woman on camera for hours just to get a small piece of change.
I personally don’t care enough to ask anyone that question, but I do know for a fact that money talks. You offer a hypothetical power bottom enough dough if he’s willing to plow a pussy, then you can bet you’ll find one who will for cash. The thing is though, the gay porn industry pays male performers more than the straight porn industry does. So that’s why the power bottom we are talking about is hypothetical, because he’s always going to earn more in the gay porn industry by virtue of being a male performer. Thus, such a situation you put forth is unlikely to ever happen. That’s the thing about the sex work industry, people are more so in it for the cash they can earn as opposed to the sex they can have.

Can we get back to talking about his cock already? Jesus fucking Christ.
Agreed, I’m over it. I didn’t intend for this to become some drawn out thing, but seems someone really wants to argue and have a moral tirade. If they really wanna discuss how they think GfP is a bane to gay culture and the gay porn industry, then they can start up a new thread in the appropriate section. I for one will not be bogging down Danny’s pic/vid thread with anymore of this discourse.
 
So you agree, they’re choosing to be gay in that moment instead of their usual straight self?

If you think Gay For Pay hasn’t had anything but a negative impact then you’re wrong. Comparing porn to regular acting is also wrong, it’s completely different.
I think most men are bisexual, not gay or straight. I've done erotic massage for almost 40 years now. I've seen thousands of clients, most were married, most never did anything with men till they were well past 30. These young men who are Gay 4 Pay may well be bisexuals who haven't yet come to terms with it but will perform for money. Later in life they may embrace that side of themselves. Sexuality is not like a chest of drawers where everyone fits in one drawer. I enjoyed sex with my wife when I was 21, but have zero desire for sex with women today except for FTM's.
 
Ok I’m confused about Danny d/ Matt Hughes being straight and being gay4pay for years longer than most gay4pay actors. Did he ever say why he switched or did he just do it. I definitely feel like he’s probably bi, but Ik he’s not doing to good with straight porn most straight guys I’ve asked about him usually say that they can’t focus on the girl because of his dick. Most straight don’t really like watching porn that involves a guy with a bigger dick than theirs anyways though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hugehungcanadian
Ok I’m confused about Danny d/ Matt Hughes being straight and being gay4pay for years longer than most gay4pay actors. Did he ever say why he switched or did he just do it. I definitely feel like he’s probably bi, but Ik he’s not doing to good with straight porn most straight guys I’ve asked about him usually say that they can’t focus on the girl because of his dick. Most straight don’t really like watching porn that involves a guy with a bigger dick than theirs anyways though.

I've never heard a straight guy complain about a male performers dick being too big or distracting them from the girl. I don't know what "straight" guys you talked to, but maybe they're not as straight as they claim to be
 
I've never heard a straight guy complain about a male performers dick being too big or distracting them from the girl. I don't know what "straight" guys you talked to, but maybe they're not as straight as they claim to be
Or u simple aren’t close enough with them for them to tell u stuff like that. Straight men do all kinds of suspicious stuff as it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SStewie
He’s just launched a poll on his OF. He’s wanting to know if people would participle in a fuck-a-fan competition. In the comments he said the competition would be open to all genders. He’s not stated if it’s him doing the fucking. It might be a ploy to garner some subscribers. We shall see how it goes.