Dick size and intelligence

I doubt whether there's any correlation. If there were, my IQ'd probably double.

Somebody mentioned Milton Berle as reputedly having a huge dick. In his heyday, the size of his wang was legendary throughout show biz. In this regard, he was known as "Mr. East Coast" (Forrest Tucker, who was on display daily at the Beverly Hills Health Club, was "Mr. West Coast").

In line with another response, the story goes that Joey Bishop, a comedian of the time and a member of Frank Sinatra's Rat Pack, once asked Berle how big it got and Berle replied he didn't know, he always passed out when he got a hard on. Bishop begged to have a look, so Berle unzipped. After taking a gander, Bishop turned and strolled off, whistling, "Why Was I Born?"

It's funny about IQ. People will admit to almost anything, but not about being deficient in the brains department. On another site, a poll was conducted on this subject - IQ and penis size. What was noticeable was that the responses looked like they could've come from a convention of Mensa members. Everyone claimed to be a genius; nary an idiot or moron in the group. Penis size was reasonably well distributed, although predictably slightly top heavy with escapees from LPSG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fabric_maker
do you think there is a correlation between the two?
for example the highest sat scores belong to Asians and they have smallest dicks
on the other hand race with lowest scores are Black and they have the biggest dicks

it kind of makes sense
the bigger the dick, it will need more blood and thus less blood to brain

If your dick is the size of a grain of rice - I may support your theory.
 
Bertrand Russell was one of the greatest philosophers and logicians of the last century—and he apparently had a very large dick.
That's just one case of course; doesn't validate or invalidate the larger point.
But I'm sure there is zip, zero, zilch for correlation between dick size and intelligence.
sorry, but where is Bertrand Russel's cock size reported on?!?
 
sorry, but where is Bertrand Russel's cock size reported on?!?
I read this many years ago and can't recall definitely. But apparently there was a picture of him and the philosopher Paul Edwards (editor of The Encyclopedia of Philosophy) both nude after some communal bathing.
I've just googled the obvious possibilities, but nothing comes up.
 
do you think there is a correlation between the two?
for example the highest sat scores belong to Asians and they have smallest dicks
on the other hand race with lowest scores are Black and they have the biggest dicks

it kind of makes sense
the bigger the dick, it will need more blood and thus less blood to brain

People with an agenda can always find something to support their devious thought processes.
 


I think that intelligence is rather bound to…

… for the animal reign scale… the size of the brain…

The specie/sub-specie homo sapiens sapiens has got a big brain comparatively to other mammals species… and its brain is also big relatively to its overall body…

… for our specie scale… the quality and the organization of the connections between the brain cells/neurons… This particular point leads me to think that intelligence is difficult to define because each person has a unique way for its neurons to connect to each other… which allows intelligence to appear under several and various aspects…

Concerning the link between intelligence and cock… more precisely the mechanism of erection… lol…

There is a hierarchy among our organs concerning the irrigation by the blood…

And certainly… the brain is well over the penis in this hierarchy… lol…

So… I think that an erection can’t private the brain from receiving blood…

Actually, our cock may be one of the less favored organs when our body has to reorganize its blood circulation because of an aggression/stress due to cold… fear…attack from someone… In all those cases, the blood will be concentrated in our muscles and our brain and certainly in other important organs like our lungs… liver… our kidneys…

But well less blood will irrigate our cock so that it will certainly retract…

In most cases… an erection is possible when we feel good… quiet and happy… and even in those cases… the size of the penis must be sufficiently reduced relatively to the brain size… lol so that the erection would have very little or no impact on the irrigation of the brain…

Thank you, littlebigcock…
 


I think that intelligence is rather bound to…

… for the animal reign scale… the size of the brain…

The specie/sub-specie homo sapiens sapiens has got a big brain comparatively to other mammals species… and its brain is also big relatively to its overall body…

… for our specie scale… the quality and the organization of the connections between the brain cells/neurons… This particular point leads me to think that intelligence is difficult to define because each person has a unique way for its neurons to connect to each other… which allows intelligence to appear under several and various aspects…

Concerning the link between intelligence and cock… more precisely the mechanism of erection… lol…

There is a hierarchy among our organs concerning the irrigation by the blood…

And certainly… the brain is well over the penis in this hierarchy… lol…

So… I think that an erection can’t private the brain from receiving blood…

Actually, our cock may be one of the less favored organs when our body has to reorganize its blood circulation because of an aggression/stress due to cold… fear…attack from someone… In all those cases, the blood will be concentrated in our muscles and our brain and certainly in other important organs like our lungs… liver… our kidneys…

But well less blood will irrigate our cock so that it will certainly retract…

In most cases… an erection is possible when we feel good… quiet and happy… and even in those cases… the size of the penis must be sufficiently reduced relatively to the brain size… lol so that the erection would have very little or no impact on the irrigation of the brain…

Thank you, littlebigcock…
 
You all are laughing, but the OP didn't make this up. It has to do with evolutionary trade offs, the idea is some races are more R selected and some K selected due to the environments they evolved in.

I'm not saying it's true, but a few scientists have had the balls to suggest something like this.
 
You all are laughing, but the OP didn't make this up. It has to do with evolutionary trade offs, the idea is some races are more R selected and some K selected due to the environments they evolved in.

I'm not saying it's true, but a few scientists have had the balls to suggest something like this.
My friend from Ga, Here you go again!! Bill