The reciever has no control over that situation so that hypothetical situation doesnt count because he never had a chance to chose what gender was servicing him so to me that is a silly statement smh why cant you guys see that once you commit a homosexual act as a so called straight man you no longer hold the title of straight? These hypotheticals you are throwing out are absolutely silly and annoying straight men only want women to suck and fuck end of story there is no inbetween
My reason for making that statement was to state that the human body will respond to stimulation. A previous post in this thread read that a 100% straight man could not be aroused by a man (fellating him). My rebuttal was written to say that it is possible, that the human body will respond to stimulation, any stimulation, man on man included. It's not an issue of if one seeks it. It's an issue of will be human body react to it. If the receiver can be aroused and to ejaculation, and that giver is a male, then the male can technically be aroused by a homosexual act.
I agree it's silly. I actually am finding the heat being written in this thread quite amusing.
I love the way you all ignore context clues and certain words in posts that disagree with the ideology that "men fucking men isn't gay". Did you not read the part of my post that said it's HABITUAL BEHAVIOR that decides someone's sexual orientation...? So yes, a guy who tries something once but decided later its not for him, could proclaim himself straight and hear no protests from me. But a guy who is constantly engaging in homosexual activity (ie 2 men engaging in sexual acts together) is NOT straight.
No argument from me, and I think we can agree on how we define how someone should define their sexuality, should they choose to define it.
Why would a straight man take the chance of having his dick touched sexually by another man?
For the sake of science... to prove that a straight man cannot be stimulated by another man. As I wrote above, I believe that the male body will respond to oral stimulation regardless who is giving it, provided the giver is allowed to give it. I think the head downstairs will have more power than the one upstairs. In a court of law, if someone stated that they could not be stimulated by another man, let the results of the game show incident proved them wrong, they'd be perjuring themselves.
Straight men, or whatever you want to call men who have NO sexual interest in other men, WOULDN'T put themselves in that sort of situation. I mean....why take that risk? Just go back a few pages and read my response to this same question being asked... cause I'm too lazy to retype it all.
And that is a fair assumption, and one I agree most men who claim to be 100 percent straight would not take, unless they were told that all the givers were female. But that is not the point I was trying to make. I was attempting to show that the man who claims to be 100% straight can be aroused by another man under the correct circumstances. I think biology wins out. A man could be blowing you under the lobster bib, and a hot hetero porno could be playing in 3D in front of you. If you got off in this scenario, then a man got a man who claims to be 100 percent straight off.
But present me with the "chance" of being blown by Chalize Theron (I love her so much) ....but tell me there's a chance there MAY be a guy there instead....I'll pass on the whole gig. Why? Because the thought of there possibly being a man there would ruin the entire experience for me.
Fair enough. That is your choice.
I would probably ante up and go for it... Odds are I would never get another chance, so why not?
Please don't say involuntary...because involuntary sexual contact is pretty much rape. Someone already posted about body responses to unwanted stimulation.
What I meant by involuntary response was not response to rape, but the body's natural response to its environment, on the same level of shivering in the cold, and sweating in the heat.
Sure, you can't always control your body....think of how many unwanted or embarassing boners you experienced early in life... Point is, if you volutarily put yourself in a position to perform sex acts with men....you VOLUTARILY did that....meaning you can't play dumb about it.
I would say you put yourself in a position to engage in great sex with someone you want to (Chalize Theron) at the risk of having sex with someone you don't want to. That is a choice, and I wouldn't play dumb about it. It's like going all-in with A-10 on a 10-10-A-3-6 flop, and one other player at the table having bullets...
Also...notice you said men in prison "CHOOSE" human contact over masturbation. Here' a hypothetical situation in the same vain as this prison shit...
Say a man and a woman are trapped in a cell together...and she wants nothing to do with him. If he forces himself on her because he "CHOOSES" human contact over masturbation....does he escape the title of rapist? Why not? He was desparate for realease and didn't want to masturbate....doesn't that grant him immunity to labels?
No. He does not escape the title of rapist. I would consider any two inmates of any sex in a cell for a long period of time... They originally despise each other, but consensually engage in sex after a period of time simply because they desire contact of some kind. I wrote "men" as plural, in the same holding cell, and chose the word "CHOOSE" for a reason. They both chose to get each other off instead of getting themselves off because rubbing it out on their own got boring, and there were no women to be had. Are they gay while they are in prison, but straight when they get released and go back to pursuing women only?
The intent of my arguments was to show that it is biologically possible for a man to get a 100 percent straight man off, and yes, deception counts in order to rebut the statement that "straight men are not aroused by men." which I take to be false. Straight men are not attracted to other men, but can be physically aroused to ejaculation by other men. If someone says, "No." and I will say, "Prove it" and then have a man fellate you, and if you get hard, it's History of the World, Part 1.
