does soft size indicate stiff size ?
- Thread starter Mikex25
- Start date
ya i would definitely agree that soft size is a very bad determination of what it will be hard, i for instance am pretty darn big! flaccid but i barely grow and inch from soft to hard but i have a friend who is quite the opposite and grows almost 7.5" from soft to hard. there is no real rhyme or reason when it comes to cock size, the only way to really know is too see it first hand.
Matt,
Matt,
B_Think_Kink
Sexy Member
Of coruse you can!
The same way you can tell how much a girls tits will sag when she is 80....
The same way you can tell how much a girls tits will sag when she is 80....
Principessa
Expert Member
Sorry dude there is absolutely no correlation between soft size and erect size.
More importantly do you even own a penis? I can't believe you are asking such a silly question.
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Posts
- 6,079
- Media
- 9,380
- Likes
- 283,574
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Maryland, United States of America
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
In response to the OP. In a certain sense, yes! Let me qualify....when a guy can show you an 8 inch or larger soft cock and some of us can, then yes, the soft cock indicates the minimum parameters of a very large erect cock! It by no means puts a ceiling on the size of the erect cock, but it guarantees that when it does erect, it will be very sizeable indeed!
Ok, you want to see him hard ?
here it is :
Do you expect this one ?
Honestly answers my friends
I would say there's no real correlation besides the fact it couldn't be smaller than it looks soft.
This topic has been analyzed at Thundersplace, and it was found that in general (there are always exceptions) "growers" close the gap some, but that's not catching up. For example, in general, 3" flaccid averages out to 5.75" erect, while 5" flaccid averages out to 7.25" erect. So the 2" flaccid gap was closed by 1/2", making it a 1.50" difference upon erection.
Similar threads
