No problem. Many thanks.Sorry. Here's Mike
View attachment 207163721
No problem. Many thanks.Sorry. Here's Mike
View attachment 207163721
I haveDoes anyone have the video of Des? I loved his scene but can’t seem to find it.
Yes, that one.Hi, Is it the one with 31 files? There are a number there I've been looking for.
Thank you so much for uploading! So many I was looking for on there too!Yes, that one.
Yes, I saw that. I'm downloading both, but it may have been one long video cut into 2. It happens sometimes.Fyi there are two Des videos.
Was he criminally prosecuted?Given that the owner was prosecuted and the videos are now over 12 years old, that seems unlikely.
Thanks,Sorry. Here's Mike
View attachment 207163721
I believe so. He lost his job as a result of the publicity and thought it would help his case if the took down the site. It's all there in the public domain if you look for it.Was he criminally prosecuted?
I have two of themFyi there are two Des videos.
Do you have a link to this please?Yes, that one.
According to the info in the public domain, he was not prosecuted. It started as a civil dispute between the site owner and one of the models. The model wanted his video taken down and eventually threatened to sue the owner; the owner did so when the lawyers got involved and paid a large amount of money to settle the issue.I believe so. He lost his job as a result of the publicity and thought it would help his case if the took down the site. It's all there in the public domain if you look for it.
He did lose his job working for a local authority. Don't know what happened to him afterwards. I imagine he kept his head down and maybe changed his name or moved abroad.According to the info in the public domain, he was not prosecuted. It started as a civil dispute between the site owner and one of the models. The model wanted his video taken down and eventually threatened to sue the owner; the owner did so when the lawyers got involved and paid a large amount of money to settle the issue.
Then it became a reputational issue when the model's lawyers went to the media to publicise the site and the owner. The owner took the site down before the story ran, presumably to minimise the embarrassment to himself and to reduce the risk of other models suing.
There's no suggestion in the public domain material of the authorities being involved.
Even that's murky tbh. Again according to the reporting of the story, he quit that job several years before the story went public. I would guess quitting was unrelated to the story, because he continued to be involved with the organisation in an unpaid voluntary role. I think it's unlikely he'd have been allowed to do that if he had quit under a cloud, or been encouraged to quit for that reason.He did lose his job working for a local authority. Don't know what happened to him afterwards. I imagine he kept his head down and maybe changed his name or moved abroad.
He was a school principal. That's why his reputation was a problem.He did lose his job working for a local authority. Don't know what happened to him afterwards. I imagine he kept his head down and maybe changed his name or moved abroad.
Yup--that's the part of this that stood out for me when it all went down. I forget where I watched or read the story about the site's demise, but whatever the information source, it indicated that he was a school principal by day and porn peddler by night.He was a school principal. That's why his reputation was a problem.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.