Dylan geick

Status
Not open for further replies.
i found these on twitter, no idea of it's real or not but i thought i should share them.

View attachment 35421521 View attachment 35421531 View attachment 35421541

No reason not to believe it's real. They've been shared a lot and the two nudes were leaked together.
Same bedding in all three pics.
Based on lack of tattoos, no back tattoo on Jackson, I guessed it was probably June - August 2017. Possibly a motel during the time when Jackson was event touring and Dylan visited and stayed the weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zaynmlk1626
No reason not to believe it's real. They've been shared a lot and the two nudes were leaked together.
Same bedding in all three pics.
Based on lack of tattoos, no back tattoo on Jackson, I guessed it was probably June - August 2017. Possibly a motel during the time when Jackson was event touring and Dylan visited and stayed the weekend.

FYI
Jackson was 19 and Dylan was 18 almost 19.
 
Why did my post get removed yet the posts of the two bickering queens debating dick size stay?

Are the mods seriously going to defend Dylan and start censoring public opinion on him? It's bad enough that at least one mod was defending the alt-right a few weeks ago.

Dylans OnlyFans is a scam. He lured people in with the reasonable exceptions of nudes, got a big pay check, posted nothing for over a month, then once everyone's subscription ran out he lures everyone back in with the promise of "full nudes", conveniently leaving out the information that the "full nudes" are locked behind an additional paywall, plus the "full nudes" are not actually full nudes, and what you do get is poorly taken photos of a man who looks pale and sick with a blurry submerged view of his penis.

He is a scammer and everyone should be calling him out for it.
Complaining about a mod in a thread is like smashing your head against a wall to help with a headache. I don't see these posts and then they spiral and get out of control. Instead please contact me.

We moderate the site from as neutral a standpoint as we possibly can. We moderate based on the reports we receive. We receive 100s of reports a day and every day is different. Some days we could be in the middle of removing 100 spam links and we get a report from the dylan thread. That could be a quick rejection just so we can get to the spam. Other days reports are quiet so we can dig deeper. Every day is different.

I can appreciate you may not understand how we moderate. Please know our moderators are not favoring anyone or trying to help anyone but the LPSG community.
 
Dylans OnlyFans is a scam. He lured people in with the reasonable exceptions of nudes, got a big pay check, posted nothing for over a month, then once everyone's subscription ran out he lures everyone back in with the promise of "full nudes", conveniently leaving out the information that the "full nudes" are locked behind an additional paywall, plus the "full nudes" are not actually full nudes, and what you do get is poorly taken photos of a man who looks pale and sick with a blurry submerged view of his penis.

He is a scammer and everyone should be calling him out for it.

What I don't get is why people get all up in arms about if people post nudes in the first place. Just because he decided to start an OnlyFans doesn't automatically mean he has to post nudes. While a great number of OF sites do, there is nowhere in the terms of agreement that states that it is exclusively a "post your nudes here" site. It is a site that connects content creators with their community free of ads. that's it. What the content creator chooses to do with their OF community is up to them. This goes for Dylan and every other "social media influencer" that has started an OF. They are free to post whatever content they choose. You are free to subscribe and unsubscribe if it is not to your satisfaction.

In the case of Dylan, he said at the outset he wasn't going to post nudes. It was for him to post content that he wanted to, that might otherwise get flagged and removed from Instagram. He, like so many other people, have been brown beaten into posting more illicit content, and/or lured in by the $$ that it can bring. He did however choose to pose nudes, using functionality offered by the platform to further monetize otherwise exclusive content. Did he make a bundle? Sure. Did they instantly get leaked and can easily be found through search? Yep. Did he deceive anyone? Only if they thought he wasn't going to exploit people and use the monetization options to their fullest extent.

And he was fully nude in the photos, submerged, yes. But he didn't lie about being fully nude. Just because you'd have rather seen him standing up hard dick in hand, spraying the camera down with splooge doesn't mean he didn't deliver on his statement.

If you feel scammed by him, go through the right channels, report him to OF and let them investigate. He is however operating within the terms of OF creators rules. It also doesn't state anywhere that a creator must post on a schedule. Just because he choose to be sleazy about "breaking the internet" by posting some naked photos behind an additional pay wall... that's on him. Unsubscribe. You've spent all of two Starbucks Lattes learning that he's a prick and a moron that exploits the obsessive nature of the gay community that want to see "famous" penises.


For what its worth, I don't subscribe to his OF, never have, never will. I think he's a sad sad person, that just happens to have a nice body. I'll happily wait on the sidelines to see whatever photos he posts as they leak and make their way around the inter-webs and read the rantings of people who continue to fall for his bullshit and bitch about it over and again.

I look at OF this way: If I go to a strip club (here in MA they are full nude) and I tip the same dancer every first friday night for six months and then on the seventh month he's not there dancing, I'm not going to stop tipping him the next time I see him simply because he choose to take some time off. The same with a streaming subscription, I'll pay for HBOMax when there's a show worth watching, otherwise, I'll cancel until the next time something interesting is on the platform.
 
What I don't get is why people get all up in arms about if people post nudes in the first place. Just because he decided to start an OnlyFans doesn't automatically mean he has to post nudes. While a great number of OF sites do, there is nowhere in the terms of agreement that states that it is exclusively a "post your nudes here" site. It is a site that connects content creators with their community free of ads. that's it. What the content creator chooses to do with their OF community is up to them. This goes for Dylan and every other "social media influencer" that has started an OF. They are free to post whatever content they choose. You are free to subscribe and unsubscribe if it is not to your satisfaction.

In the case of Dylan, he said at the outset he wasn't going to post nudes. It was for him to post content that he wanted to, that might otherwise get flagged and removed from Instagram. He, like so many other people, have been brown beaten into posting more illicit content, and/or lured in by the $$ that it can bring. He did however choose to pose nudes, using functionality offered by the platform to further monetize otherwise exclusive content. Did he make a bundle? Sure. Did they instantly get leaked and can easily be found through search? Yep. Did he deceive anyone? Only if they thought he wasn't going to exploit people and use the monetization options to their fullest extent.

And he was fully nude in the photos, submerged, yes. But he didn't lie about being fully nude. Just because you'd have rather seen him standing up hard dick in hand, spraying the camera down with splooge doesn't mean he didn't deliver on his statement.

If you feel scammed by him, go through the right channels, report him to OF and let them investigate. He is however operating within the terms of OF creators rules. It also doesn't state anywhere that a creator must post on a schedule. Just because he choose to be sleazy about "breaking the internet" by posting some naked photos behind an additional pay wall... that's on him. Unsubscribe. You've spent all of two Starbucks Lattes learning that he's a prick and a moron that exploits the obsessive nature of the gay community that want to see "famous" penises.


For what its worth, I don't subscribe to his OF, never have, never will. I think he's a sad sad person, that just happens to have a nice body. I'll happily wait on the sidelines to see whatever photos he posts as they leak and make their way around the inter-webs and read the rantings of people who continue to fall for his bullshit and bitch about it over and again.

I look at OF this way: If I go to a strip club (here in MA they are full nude) and I tip the same dancer every first friday night for six months and then on the seventh month he's not there dancing, I'm not going to stop tipping him the next time I see him simply because he choose to take some time off. The same with a streaming subscription, I'll pay for HBOMax when there's a show worth watching, otherwise, I'll cancel until the next time something interesting is on the platform.

does anybody really read this??? I mean lmao. Feels like doing essays at school
 
Just because he decided to start an OnlyFans doesn't automatically mean he has to post nudes. While a great number of OF sites do, there is nowhere in the terms of agreement that states that it is exclusively a "post your nudes here" site. It is a site that connects content creators with their community free of ads. that's it. What the content creator chooses to do with their OF community is up to them.

Your argument falls apart with one word: Patreon.

Dylan has had a Patreon since at least May 2019, it is a website for content creators to express themselves and connect with their community free of ads. In Dylans own words:

"I try to eschew advertising as much as possible, preferring to rely on direct audience support to fund the creation of all my content. This is really the page that makes it easy to support me if you appreciate any endeavor of mine."

Patreon is known and has a reputation of supporting artists and small businesses, it is perfectly set up to support Dylans artistic endeavors and ambitious lifestyle.

Patreon even allows nudity, all they require is that any posts with nudity are tagged with the appropriate adult 18+ warnings. The only content Patreon does not allow is masturbation or sex/sexual acts.

> Why then did Dylan create an OnlyFans when he already had a Patreon that fully allows and more adequately supports everything he hopes to achieve?

> What does OnlyFans offer that Patreon does not?

> What is the known community expectations and reputation that OnlyFans has compared to Patreons expectations and reputation?

Once you answer those three questions above you can clearly understand why so many people are upset with Dylan, it's because even though he already had a platform that was adequate for his needs he took advantage of the known communally accepted reputation of what OnlyFans is and how it differs from other such platforms such as Patreon to lure in a larger audience and thus a bigger paycheck.
 
come on guys, can't you just share hot photos in this thread? who is going to read such a long post as a school essay? you could express your opininons with a shorter text at least
There is an onlyfans thread for him created I assume for people who want to avoid "unnecessary conversations". Lol
 
come on guys, can't you just share hot photos in this thread? who is going to read such a long post as a school essay? you could express your opininons with a shorter text at least
I just put him on ignore there is absolutely no reason to keep posting that long ass stupid shit that absolutely nobody is reading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rvpaem and dxrkhype
come on guys, can't you just share hot photos in this thread? who is going to read such a long post as a school essay? you could express your opininons with a shorter text at least

Hot photos just get deleted on this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.