Eugene choi

[goonlat]

@hmphgadzooks You two deserve each other.

He's lost his humanity. WTF.

 

[Matt96_creek]

Btw, Elon Musk is working right now with his platform IGNORING threatening reports against women. I didn't believe until I see it by myself because yesterday I also saw that someone was threatened since Trump won and she reported it and X didn't do nothing. Be aware of that.

Translation:

Hi,

After reviewing the available information, we wanted to let you know that our automated systems have detected that matw1 has not violated our rules against posting violent threats. We know this is not the answer you're looking for. For a summary of what is not allowed on X, learn more here.

You can block the account, which means it will not be able to follow you, see your posts, or send you messages.

Reports like this inform our policies, which we constantly review to improve, as well as how we enforce them. We hope you'll continue to report things if you see things that may violate our policies.

Thanks,

X

 

[hmphgadzooks]

Violent words usually lead to violent actions. The fact that you're waiting for him to actually harm somebody before you take it seriously is crazy to me.

If you like to date and fuck men who spew violent rhetoric on internet then just say that. You don't need to sit here writing pretentious paragraphs to justify it to yourself and pretending like you're some insightful and enlightened sage of wisdom. Just go hit his DM's and play captain save a hoe.

Your response illustrates an understandable concern about the impact of language and behavior online, but it's important to dissect these nuances with clarity rather than blanket assumptions. To state "violent words usually lead to violent actions" as a universal truth is an oversimplification that disregards context and intent. Research and psychological evaluations indicate that while some violent rhetoric can indeed precede action in specific scenarios, the causal link is far from absolute. To say that everyone who uses intense or provocative language online is inevitably on the path to real-world violence ignores a critical reality: the performative nature of social media.

As I previously mentioned, many individuals engage in heightened rhetoric as a strategic move to attract attention and build a following—this behavior is not necessarily indicative of a genuine intent to cause harm. Eugene's videos, as cited by others and supported by his own statement "figuratively speaking," underscore that his rants are more performative than threatening. This distinction is pivotal. Drawing a line between hyperbolic speech used for engagement and genuine threats is essential to understanding intent and mitigating undue alarmism.

The argument that I'm simply defending or attempting to justify questionable behavior is a misinterpretation. A measured analysis isn't about "saving" or endorsing someone; it’s about approaching the situation with rational discernment instead of knee-jerk assumptions. Dismissing this as pretentious only undermines a reasoned conversation.

Lastly, the implication that discussing these nuances is an invitation to personal attacks or assumptions about my motives is baseless. Engagement with discourse should invite thoughtful debate, not unnecessary derision.

 

[Brownrug]

Gurl, you’re too much.

 

[jerbearsmith1]

I think Eugene finally just needs dick from one of us. That'll set him straight... err, gay.

 

[thatoneguy90]

If him being unhinged wasn't enough, that twitter post from Oct 24th should be. Unwatching this thread now! Byeeee! lololololol

 

[Haru N]

It's interesting that you assert I’m "projecting" while reiterating statements that illustrate the exact tone I addressed. The words and intent you express may not be rooted in overt anger, but framing someone's content as mockery and implying that his actions warrant ongoing criticism carries an air of hostility and disproportionate focus. Whether or not you explicitly mentioned appearance or mental health, the collective response from others—encouraged by such sentiments—often spirals into unwarranted personal attacks. I stand by my view: If refusing to pile on to an unjust chorus and instead advocating for fair consideration makes me akin to someone you disapprove of, then that speaks more about the nature of this conversation than anything else.

@hmphgadzooks Youre once again projecting... or youre in denial and as delusional as Eugene is. Which takes me back to my original point, you two deserve each other. Isnt that what you want after all?

 

[hmphgadzooks]

@hmphgadzooks Youre once again projecting... or youre in denial and as delusional as Eugene is. Which takes me back to my original point, you two deserve each other. Isnt that what you want after all?

If by "projection" you mean assessing a situation with critical thinking rather than jumping to conclusions, then I’ll accept that label. Your repeated claim that I’m in denial, without offering any substantive counterpoints, only highlights the circular nature of this conversation. You’ve returned to your original sentiment without addressing any of the issues or evidence presented—opting instead for personal jabs and overgeneralizations. If pointing out the flaws in this approach leads you to believe I am somehow "delusional" or aligned with Eugene, it suggests that you’re more focused on discrediting me than having a constructive dialogue.

This discussion was never about defending an individual blindly; it’s about understanding nuances and resisting the urge to make every conversation a moral battleground devoid of context. Dismissing rational analysis as "delusional" or conflating it with agreement does not foster understanding. It reduces complex topics to simple binaries, where anyone not wholly in agreement is labeled and dismissed. If advocating for thoughtful discourse equates to "deserving" someone, then I’ll accept that badge—because it speaks more to the values I hold than the superficial judgments cast by others.

 

[Gayboy11]

I would still consider dating him or simply doing him—he’s undeniably attractive. While I may not agree with his recent remarks, I can empathize with his perspective. He's hurt. Like most human beings, he's seeking monogamy, genuine intimacy with a woman. I respect the confidence it takes to express such views publicly, even when they're controversial. There are many who still find men like him appealing, and I personally believe his penis size is ideal. Unfortunately, he isn’t attracted to men—emotionally, physically, or intellectually—focusing only on women, despite his recent tirade that seemed to criticize them harshly. Better to use his words than to take physical action, like assault. Lately, it appears he’s grown indifferent toward men, even from a financial standpoint. (sad face)

Oh girl ur delusional

 

[hmphgadzooks]

Oh girl ur delusional

Resorting to calling me "delusional" is a convenient way to dodge the points I've made, but it doesn’t add any substance to the conversation. If you’re truly uninterested in engaging thoughtfully, that’s fine, but labeling a difference in perspective as "delusion" only sidesteps meaningful discussion. If having a view that allows for nuance and complexity seems foreign or frustrating to you, I can understand why you'd revert to dismissal rather than dialogue. But dismissing perspectives you don’t agree with by reducing them to simple labels reflects more about one’s approach to conflict than it does about the actual argument at hand.

 

[Gayslut100]

omfg I came here for pleasure not twitter fights, ugh another thread ruined

 

[Gayboy11]

omfg I came here for pleasure not twitter fights, ugh another thread ruined

The man is demented lmao like what. What can u possibly find pleasurable

 

[Gayslut100]

Idfk i love dick

The man is demented lmao like what. What can u possibly find pleasur

 

[Lennykenny420]

Just tryna see some micropenis on a buff Asian dude

 

[ARTPOPsickle]

Has some skype muscle worship showsView attachment 913598 View attachment 913599 View attachment 913600 View attachment 913601 View attachment 913603 View attachment 913604 View attachment 913605 View attachment 913606

Wow he has the ittiest bittiest wittle peepee good thing he still has a pussy to get off that way because that little thing is useless other than using it as a handle to slam up into that pussy

 

[gtafunmuscle]

Wow he has the ittiest bittiest wittle peepee good thing he still has a pussy to get off that way because that little thing is useless other than using it as a handle to slam up into that pussy

you know his face is doctored

 

[nightcoreblue]

I really wish his nude videos that this one person gatekeeps on thisvid would randomly pop up here or anywhere.

He doesn't seem like a good person anyway so there really isn't a lot of reasons to feel bad if ever it leaks. As questionable as he is as a person, it is undeniable that his outsides are hot as fuck.

 

[Deppboy]

View attachment 166801191
View attachment 166801261
View attachment 166801471

Thanks for sharing these!

 

[automaticdriver]

I really wish his nude videos that this one person gatekeeps on thisvid would randomly pop up here or anywhere.

He doesn't seem like a good person anyway so there really isn't a lot of reasons to feel bad if ever it leaks. As questionable as he is as a person, it is undeniable that his outsides are hot as fuck.

i know. his cock is so beautiful, i dont know why he is shy about it.

 

[BigDan285]

View attachment 167242671

I'm glad everyone's enjoying this vid so much... I'm the one who paid for the call with him and recorded it