french monstercock

Posts Attachments
Sort by date Most Liked Posts
It's not real, the guy has done something quite clever however. Rather than just using the same old photo manipulation computer sourcery (ie Photoshop) he has used two pictures. One is of his body from a distance and the other is a close up photo of a (maybe his, but certainly someones) cock. He has blended the two together in order to make it appear like its a really big dick. Sneaky stuff, but sadly not real.
 
I analysed the pics in Photoshop and they are extremely well done if they have been modified. The enlargement was probably less than 10% because it looks very convincing.

I think that it is possible the photos were unmodified, the frontal pics are taken from a very flattering angle but even so, it doesn't look more than 10" long, however the girth is huge in every picture.
 
if it's fake then it's really well done... looks legit to me. It's definitely a larger than average cock but it's not so big as to be automatically fake. the dude is super slim, it's not impossible for a fat 9-10 incher to look that large relative to a frame that size.
 
I suppose it depends on which photos you are looking at. I looked initially only at this one, which seems to me blatantly fake, as does this one. The proportions and textures don't make sense to my eye, and you can see some funny business in each photo at the base of the cock. On the other hand, in this one and this one, the dick doesn't look impossibly disproportionate, though you can still see the signs of alteration in the image at the base of the penis in the second one. The first of those two seems to me the most believable of the lot, but I still think that it is altered: if you look at the upper boundary of the cock near the base, there is an odd line.
 
Calboner said:
I suppose it depends on which photos you are looking at. I looked initially only at this one, which seems to me blatantly fake, as does this one. The proportions and textures don't make sense to my eye, and you can see some funny business in each photo at the base of the cock. On the other hand, in this one and this one, the dick doesn't look impossibly disproportionate, though you can still see the signs of alteration in the image at the base of the penis in the second one. The first of those two seems to me the most believable of the lot, but I still think that it is altered: if you look at the upper boundary of the cock near the base, there is an odd line.
Click to expand...

yup calboner is right on the fake pic.. i've got a good eye for this shit and if it was a genuine photograph and no modifications i.e (photoshop) the base of his cock wouldnt blur out of focus at that distance - if u look carefully..

that happens when u enlarge a fixed photo unless it is a vector image - which it is not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DanXWrites
Dinner With My Hung Chef
Replies
2
Views
823
Erotic Stories
michaelnola
M
QuietDood144
Help Me Identify Who This Is?
Replies
2
Views
43
Gay Photos and Videos
buckeyeboi
B
costnerkevin
Big penis please!
Replies
0
Views
366
Sex With a Large Penis
costnerkevin
costnerkevin
Blkfuego
Gurvish
Replies
1
Views
201
OnlyFans and Web Personalities
degrassi22
D
T
Axel en vrai
Replies
3
Views
186
OnlyFans and Web Personalities
ThatRandomDude2024
T
Top Bottom