actibot
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2023
- Posts
- 302
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,437
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Puebla,mexico
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Jeez - I thought "Evil Ed" was over-the-top in his mainstream movies, but here he makes regular porn-stars look like Oscar-winning actors!Hunk hotel
Hunter is very hot. Is there any more videos of him?Hollywood Bad boys 1 y 2
Hunter está buenÃsimo. ¿Hay más vÃdeos de él?
El softcore gay de antes si era erótico el de ahora es más artificial¿Hay alguna compañÃa *ahora* que haga pelÃculas especÃficamente softcore para hombres gay? Parece que cuando visitas sitios de torrents y revisas la sección softcore, suben videos de masturbación y los llaman softcore. :\suave
Solo scenes are not softcore. Softcore is simulation of sex that looks unsimulated.Old school beauty Steve Kelso
Masculine. Shower. Precum. Edge. Hard. No cum. Humping
Intimate Hours With Steve Kelso at Suck Jerk Cock Tube
Sorry, gotta disagree with you... The only thing in this video is an erection, so yes, it qualifies as softcore.Solo scenes are not softcore. Softcore is simulation of sex that looks unsimulated.
so you define hardcore as when there is visible penestration or orgasm.Sorry, gotta disagree with you... The only thing in this video is an erection, so yes, it qualifies as softcore.
The thing is, many of us remember when films were literally made as a specific genre of softcore pornography - actual movies intended to sexually arouse the same way as hardcore porn, usually with some kind of narrative, and simply not depicting penetration.
I remember things differently. UK laws restricted the showing of any form of penetration including oral, but hard ons were fine. That's how you got things like the 'Dagenham Dave" series, and frequently there would be the softcore Bel Ami (and other studio) edits for UK release that would show everything up until actual penetration and then cut to other angles and shots - but they showed plenty of hard dicks.In the UK up until the late 1980s, hardcore porn was anything that showed an erect cock - gay, straight, solo, couples. So an 18-rated video specifically aimed at turning you on in those days wasn't even as explicit as the kind of things shown on Netflix now : UK Bel Ami releases were something like an episode of Elite, without the plot or dialogue!
I have quite a few 18-rated gay videos - including some Bel Ami ones - and there isn't a hard-on in any of them... semis maybe, but no full erections : in one, a guy clearly has a hard-on when he removes his pants, but there's an abrupt cut to him covering it with his hands. Or any cock-handling, solo or with other guys.I remember things differently. UK laws restricted the showing of any form of penetration including oral, but hard ons were fine. That's how you got things like the 'Dagenham Dave" series, and frequently there would be the softcore Bel Ami (and other studio) edits for UK release that would show everything up until actual penetration and then cut to other angles and shots - but they showed plenty of hard dicks.
I have a bunch as well, specifically the aforementioned "Dagenham Dave" series which was exclusiely an 18+ UK release on VHS, three in the series. In that one, not only are they hard and touching each others' cocks, when they do the actual sucking and fucking, sometimes the angle slips just slightly and you briefly see a dick go in a mouth etc... So I really do feel like the laws allowed anything that wasn't actual oral, anal or vaginal penetration or ejaculation. I could be wrong though, but that's how I understood them.I have quite a few 18-rated gay videos - including some Bel Ami ones - and there isn't a hard-on in any of them... semis maybe, but no full erections : in one, a guy clearly has a hard-on when he removes his pants, but there's an abrupt cut to him covering it with his hands. Or any cock-handling, solo or with other guys.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.