I am a designer and a photo editor, not the greatest but know a little bit of editing images. I took this pic and went through 3 different softwares that can prove if something is fake or not. I'll leave them here so you guys can use them too and see it for youselfs:
imageedited.com ,
29a.ch/photo-forensics and
fotoforensics.com. None of them found anything fake on that pic. Nothing out of the ordinary.
once again, I see nothing wrong with the tattoo.
View attachment 45938411
What you think is missing is the curve of the mermaid tale, that is in a different angle of his arm. I'm not the biggest Harry fan so I don't know when he got the tattoos, and I noticed that in these 2 pics that I use to show that there's nothing missing there are 2 tattos missing next to the mermaid, Then I saw the he had the mermaid tattoo first
So still, everything is ok until now.
I'm sorry but this makes absolutely no sense. There are plenty of British men that are circumcised. And we know, for reasons we cannot say, that harry is circumcised. Dappy, for example is a british rapper and circumcised.
Also the fact that the dic is not curved is fake? WTF?
in fact this one is in a much better quality than the one with the watermark. Which only helps to prove is the original.
I don't see what you're trying to prove here.
And last, but not least, let's not forget that Harry stans are desperately trying to discredit or hide these nudes since they emerged. They are flooding twitter with the words Harry Styles Nude to hide the pics and they already managed to get the ones that were posted here deleted more than once.
Until now there's not a concrete proof that this is fake. I choose to believe!