HECTOR MARTINEZ

Has anyone watched his new raw videos
Yep, and he cut out 99% of him getting the bottom half painted.

Theres a video where he does a massage on mon and I’m pretty sure he gets hard during that. can anyone with a sub confirm?
He does not get hard in that video. If he did it was cut out.

Because, as we all know, Saint Hector does not get erections, ever. :joy:
 
Yep, and he cut out 99% of him getting the bottom half painted.


He does not get hard in that video. If he did it was cut out.

Because, as we all know, Saint Hector does not get erections, ever. :joy:
He is a nudist content creator, that has a stated goal to promote nudism and how nudity is not inherently sexual. It is what you are signing up for. Or not, I don't know your subscription, either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nsfgeniew
Yep, and he cut out 99% of him getting the bottom half painted.


He does not get hard in that video. If he did it was cut out.

Because, as we all know, Saint Hector does not get erections, ever. :alegría:
Ni tan Santo, para juntarse con estos 2
Son Mauricio y Paulina, pareja de organizadores de fiestas swingers en Zipolite
 

Attachments

Ni tan Santo, para juntarse con estos 2
Son Mauricio y Paulina, pareja de organizadores de fiestas swingers en Zipolite
Pues, de hecho, en alguna ocasión me metí en su X (todavía era Twitter) a ver a quienes seguía y, mínimo en ese entonces, seguia muchas cuentas de eventos swinger, pero supongo eso es independiente a su estilo de vida nudista.
 
He is a nudist content creator, that has a stated goal to promote nudism and how nudity is not inherently sexual. It is what you are signing up for. Or not, I don't know your subscription, either way.
In my opinion, this fear of various male "nudist creators" of erections is reductive. Your brand is body positivity and embracing your body in all of its glory but hide this side of it.

Erections themselves are not inherently sexual. They can occur due to hormonal fluctuations, random physical stimuli, etc.

There's a big difference between randomly getting hard because your body is being painted and it's merely reacting to the physical sensation, and getting hard because you're in a sexual situation.

There's also the issue of promoting "Raw" content when you're editing out sections because it doesn't align with the image you want to promote. It is no longer "raw" then.
 
In my opinion, this fear of various male "nudist creators" of erections is reductive. Your brand is body positivity and embracing your body in all of its glory but hide this side of it.

Erections themselves are not inherently sexual. They can occur due to hormonal fluctuations, random physical stimuli, etc.

There's a big difference between randomly getting hard because your body is being painted and it's merely reacting to the physical sensation, and getting hard because you're in a sexual situation.

There's also the issue of promoting "Raw" content when you're editing out sections because it doesn't align with the image you want to promote. It is no longer "raw" then.
Okay, I have to admit this is a much more well-thought-out stance than I usually expect. And I don't completely disagree, but at same time: I can see where the fear comes from? It is already an uphill battle to promote the idea that the nude body is inherently sexual, and doing so while being casual about erections is an extra layer of difficulty. Not to mention that the nudist community is already weary of men in general. Add the notion that many of those creators are going to be bombarded with unwanted sexual advances and I can see how the equilibrium they reach is editing out erections and anything that might be considered provocative.

That all said, yeah, if it is edited then it is not "raw", and that is plain dishonest.
 
Last edited: