Ah, but remember, mythology is based upon fact.You just summed up Christian mythology as a whole.
Ah, but remember, mythology is based upon fact.You just summed up Christian mythology as a whole.
Ah, but remember, mythology is based upon fact.
That parable is an oldie.I never saw it so beautifully worded before. Thank you for putting it in words that I not only agree with but understand.
Ah, but remember, mythology is based upon fact.
If not we may be able to start one--Or is there already a Michel Foucault related fleshpile thread?
Oldie or not it's the first time I've read it and that was good enough for me.That parable is an oldie.
I don't know the origin.
You have LORD in your name-- isn't it somewhat blasphemous to be questioning Hell?Perhaps, rather my decadent friend, it has its roots in someone's facts.
You have LORD in your name-- isn't it somewhat blasphemous to be questioning Hell?
That's a simple model which fits some religions well enough, though others not well at all.Here's something to dwell on although it may be me being a little simplistic. Heaven needs an antithesis to exist and the lines of good and evil, light and dark etc.
Well, many philosophers believe that Religion is just a way for a plutocractic society to educate it's slack-jawed masses about morals and ethics. Religion, while spiritual in appearance, largely represents a moral code and set of "acceptable" behaviours, if in parable form.
Plutocrats aren't necessarily very good teachers, but they are generally technocratic (skilled in the use of power). Power doesn't teach that well through Socratic method... It's much better at allegory, indoctrination and ye carrot (heaven) and ye stick (hell).
Here's something to dwell on although it may be me being a little simplistic. Heaven needs an antithesis to exist and the lines of good and evil, light and dark etc.
The traditional christian notion of God seems utterly ridiculous to me and frankly an insult to anyone's intelligence.The traditional christian notion of hell, seems utterly ridiculous to me and frankly an insult to anyone's intelligence.
I wouldn't have so much trouble with it if it was just some long-haired gay jewish hippie carpenter telling you to love your neighbour and not be such a selfish materialist asswipe and promising you some extra candy and good seating in the afterlife.
But ALL versions of the Abrahamic gods are fucking tools when you get right down to it.
Each new version of hell, Jewish, Christian, Islamic gets more brutal than the one that proceeded it as the creative-writing authors of the next so-called 'holy' book feel the need to seem more "serious" and "hard-core" than the those who came before them
The biggest religion in the world, Christianity as taught/practiced is essentially a militant, quietist, apocalyptic judeaic cult and slave-religion from the 1st century C.E, with some footnotes added by St. Paul on his own messed up personal psychosexual issues.
If it's followers followed it's holy book to it's logical/literal ends we'd end up with 2 billion people behaving like David Koresh mated with the Reverend Phellps. Most of Mr. Phellps behavior is scripturally accurate at least as far as that book of hate-literature the old-testament is concerned.
Next, how did we as a species improve on this wonderful Christian faith ? We invented Islam and added expicit murder and genocide,more misogony for God mixed in with some Arabist-racial supremacism. Now we have people in Iraq taking people apart with drills while they are still alive as they yell "God is Great". What a wonderful moral education !
Myself I want nothing to do with this sicko Tony-Soprano wannabe god.
This contrived construct called Religion often turns people into monsters.
Enough with the appologists for these fuckers too. Time to take these 3 religions out behind the wood shed and give them two shots to the head.
It does?Why should rational thought and reason apply to every other thing in the universe,
Lord, I'm running out of paper and inkQ: But why? Why do we do that?
A: All human actions are motivated at their deepest level by one of two emotions - fear or love. In truth there are only two emotions - only two words in the language of the soul. These are the opposite ends up the great polarity which I created when I produced the universe, and your world, as you know it today.
These are the two points - the Alpha and the Omega - which allow the system you call 'relativity' to be. Without these two points, without these two ideas about things, no other idea could exist.
Every human though, and every human action, is based in either love or fear. There is no other human motivation, and all other ideas are but derivatives or these two. There are simply different versions - different twists on the same theme.
Think on this deeply and you will see that it is true. This is what I have called the Sponsoring Thought. It is either a thought of love or fear. This is the thought behind the thought behind the thought. It is the first thought. It is the prime force. It is the raw energy that drives the engine of human experience.
And here is how human behavior produces repeat experience after repeat experience; it is why humans love, then destroy, then love again: always there is the swing from one emotion to the other. Love sponsors fear sponsors love sponsors fear...
... And the reason is found in the first lie - the lie which you hold as the truth about God - that God cannot be trusted; that God's love cannot be depended upon; that God's acceptance of you is conditional; that the ultimate outcome is thus in doubt. For if you cannot depend on God's love to always be there, on whose love can you depend? If God retreats and withdraws when you do not perform properly, will not mere mortals also?
... And so it is that in the moment you pledge your highest love, you greet your greatest fear.
For the first thing you worry about after saying "I love you" is whether you'll hear it back. And if you hear it back, then you begin immediately to worry that the love you have just found, you will lose. And so all action becomes a reaction - defense against loss - even as you seek to defend yourself against the loss of God.
Yet if you knew Who You Are - that you are the most magnificent, the most remarkable, the most splendid being God has ever created - you would never fear. For who could reject such wondrous magnificence? Not even God could find fault in such a being.
But you do now know Who You Are, and you think you are a great deal less. And where did you get the idea of how much less than magnificent you are? From the only people whose word you would take on everything. From your mother and your father.
These are the people who love you the most. Why would they lie to you? Yet have they not told you that you are too much of this, and not enough of that? Have they not reminded you that you are to be seen and not heard? Have they not scolded you in some of the moments of your greatest exuberance? And, did they not encourage you to set aside some of your wildest imagining?
These are the messages you've received, and though they do not meet the criteria, are thus not messages from God, they might as well have been, for they have come from the gods of your universe surely enough.
It was your parents you taught you that love is conditional - you have felt their conditions many times - and that is the experience you take into your own love relationships.
It is also the experience you bring to Me.
From this experience you draw your conclusions about Me. Within this framework you speak your truth. "God is a love God," you say, "but if you break His commandments, He will punish you with eternal banishment and everlasting damnation."
For have you not experience the banishment of your own parents? Do you not know the pain of their damnation? How, then, could you imagine it to be any different with Me?
You have forgotten what it was like to be loved without condition. You do not remember the experience of the love of God. And so you try to imagine what God's love must be like, based on what you see of love in the world.
You have projected the role of "parent" onto God, and have thus come up with a God Who judges and rewards or punishes, based on how good He feels about what you've been up to. But this is a simplistic view of God, based on your mythology. It has nothing to do with Who I Am.
Having thus created an entire thought system about God based on human experience rather than spiritual truths, you then create an entire reality around love. It is a fear-based reality, rooted in the idea of a fearful, vengeful God. It's Sponsoring Thought is wrong but to deny that thought would be to disrupt your whole theology. And though the new theology which would replace it would truly be your salvation, you cannot accept it, because the idea of a God Who is not to feared, Who will not judge, and Who has no cause to punish is simply too magnificent to be embraced within even your grandest notion of Who and What God is.
This fear-based love reality dominates your experience of love; indeed, actually creates it. For not only do you see yourself receiving love which is conditional, you also watch yourself giving it in the same way. And even while you withhold and retreat and set your conditions, a part of you knows this is not what love really is. Still, you seem powerless to change the way you dispense it. You've learned the hard way, you tell yourself, and you'll be damned if you're going to leave yourself vulnerable again. Yet the truth is, you'll be damned if you don't.
[By your own (mistaken) thoughts about love do you damn yourself never to experience it purely. So, too, do you damn yourself never to know Me as I really am. Until you do. For you shall not be able to deny Me forever, and the moment will come for our Reconciliation.]
Every action taken by human beings is based in love or fear, not simply those dealing with relationships. Decisions affecting business, industry, politics, religion, the education of your young, the social agenda of your nations, the economic goals of your society, choice involving war, peace, attack, defense, aggression, submission; determinations to covet or give away, to save or to share, to unite or to divide - every single free choice you ever undertake arises out of one of the only two possible thoughts there are: a thought of love or a thought of fear.
Fear is the energy which contracts, closes down, draws in, runs, hides, hoards, harms.
Love is the energy which expands, opens up, sends out, stays, reveals, shares, heals.
Fear wraps our bodies in clothing, love allows us to stand naked. Fear clings to and clutches all that we have, love gives all that we have away. Fear holds close, love holds dear. Fear grasps, love lets go. Fear rankles, love soothes. Fear attacks, love amends.
Every human thought, word, or deed is based in one emotion or the other. You have no choice about this, because there is nothing else from which to choose. But you have free choice about which of these to select.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.