Hugh Jackman

Not really the exact same picture so no advice will be taken. :fing26:

Let me help you here. Your photo is a photoshop deal, and it is almost decent. The person on one side is shown in an earlier appearance (presented by me) with his shorts on. The arms are in the same position, the face, the hair, everything. As I indicated though, your pic is not quite as brilliant, the colors and clarity are weakened, the water looks less than appealing. Nice body though.



Admit defeat and accept the punishment- a week on a dude ranch with Dick Cheney:biggrin1:.
 
They are the same photo. One is real and the other is a fantasy.

You really think any famous person is going to go swimming in the sea naked? There's no precedent for it and there's a good reason for it too.

The photoshopped picture has had a filter applied to make the colours look a bit duller and grainy, like in a magazine. Or perhaps a scanned image.

Some of you will accept anything as real no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
 
Let me help you here. Your photo is a photoshop deal, and it is almost decent. The person on one side is shown in an earlier appearance (presented by me) with his shorts on. The arms are in the same position, the face, the hair, everything. As I indicated though, your pic is not quite as brilliant, the colors and clarity are weakened, the water looks less than appealing. Nice body though.



Admit defeat and accept the punishment- a week on a dude ranch with Dick Cheney:biggrin1:.
Your so-called help is not required, old man so shove it. Along with the rest of your post. There's no defeat to admit. Goodbye.

You really think any famous person is going to go swimming in the sea naked? There's no precedent for it and there's a good reason for it too.
What planet have you been living on over the past 20 years? Plenty of celebrities go swimming naked. We sure have seen plenty of real pics that aren't photoshopped which prove this. And IF the first pic of Hugh is a fake, then who's the owner of that cock? There must be a face to match with it and I'd like to see it.
 
Last edited:
Let me help you here. Your photo is a photoshop deal, and it is almost decent. The person on one side is shown in an earlier appearance (presented by me) with his shorts on. The arms are in the same position, the face, the hair, everything. As I indicated though, your pic is not quite as brilliant, the colors and clarity are weakened, the water looks less than appealing. Nice body though.



Admit defeat and accept the punishment- a week on a dude ranch with Dick Cheney:biggrin1:.


Those that want you to believe that there is no photoshopping in the photo will never admit defeat :rolleyes: :wink:
 
...old man so shove it...
And so polite too, a rare combination of delusion and manners together:tongue:.

Those that want you to believe that there is no photoshopping in the photo will never admit defeat :rolleyes: :wink:

Just as long as I can keep looking at your photos Mr.Countryguy63 the rest won't matter.
 
it doesn't make the pics more real, just because some tv-station talked about them. that picture has been around for quite some time actually, and it's an obvious fake. the picture that northman posted is the real deal, and as he pointed out, it's much clearer, and Hugh is wearing black, wet shorts - and not swinging his dick around. the reason the other one is low quality, is to try to hide the photoshop seams. believe what you want to believe, but the picture is a definite fake. end of story.
 
jackmanhugh01.gif


Sorry your fakes aren't any good. You can stop pretending now.