Hugh Jackman
- Thread starter Chicago8inch
- Start date
Hugh being convincing in a stage play hardly equates to him definitely being in the queer spectrum. That’s why it’s called “acting”. Him being a constant presence at Bryan Singer parties for several years is much more suspect. His wife’s obvious insecurities and the need for her to tell the press how hetero he is every two years is more suspect. Marrying a much older woman (something that is stereotypical for many queer males) is much more suspect.
At the end of the day, I suspect at least half of Hollywood has some type of queer dimensions, fluidity, paraphiliacs, is somewhere in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum. So, Hugh potentially having queer dimensions was never a big deal, at least not to me. We don’t really know the exact dimensions or preferences or motivations of Hugh, and even post divorce we probably never will.
At the end of the day, I suspect at least half of Hollywood has some type of queer dimensions, fluidity, paraphiliacs, is somewhere in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum. So, Hugh potentially having queer dimensions was never a big deal, at least not to me. We don’t really know the exact dimensions or preferences or motivations of Hugh, and even post divorce we probably never will.
Even if Hugh is queer, is homo-leaning when it comes to the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum, intends to date guys- I still don’t see him being unabashedly publicly out any time soon. He spent decades constructing a certain image, diverting rumors, sending his wife to the press every so often to snuff out certain stories. If he was to go down the “gay/pan/bi/queer pride” route or the “I was naive and scared” route he’d have to be fo’ real honest about his journey and motivations and struggles in order to not be seen as entirely manipulative, and I don’t see that happening.
- m999,
tbh the Bryan Singer parties are pretty definitive evidence that require no speculation. Those gatherings had only one function and everybody knows it now. A completely straight man going once or twice might plausibly be a polite "I didn't realize." Years on end is the equivalent of finding the guy's been on grindr since 2010 but convincing yourself it's just about career networking or some BS.
Dude was trolling for boyflesh, at one end or the other, whether he ever admits to it or not.
Dude was trolling for boyflesh, at one end or the other, whether he ever admits to it or not.
Singer was a very popular director and had a lot of industry friends. He also was a megalomaniac who loved to show the world his industry power and all the famous people he was “friends” with (somewhat akin to Kevin Spacey and Harvey Weinstein in a multitude of ways). It would make sense for him to have a bunch of famous folks at some of his gatherings, especially his less salacious ones. So, that alone isn’t enough for me. But when you add to the equation marrying a much older woman, both your children being adopted, just how uncomfortable his wife was with the queer rumors, and the clockwork “my husband is ‘straight” interviews she would give every couple years- it does seem to scream an obvious message. Even when the rumors had been dead for years she’d still bring them up. At the very least, he seems to have some type of queer dimensions and lived “queer lifestyle” at whatever points. However, what that may have to do with his marriage ending we don’t know. The dimensions of his “sexuality”, sexual journey, preferences, where he is in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment- we also don’t know.
Like I said, Jackman comes off like the type of industry person who would be perfectly content never being unabashedly “out” publicly even in old age and even if he were thoroughly homosexual, sexually homo-leaning, romantically/emotionally homo, and had multiple gay relationships.
Apparently, he's writing a tell-all in which he will "finally be honest with himself."
We shall see but it sounds like his PR is setting the stage for a homo moment:
We shall see but it sounds like his PR is setting the stage for a homo moment:
Hugh Jackman Is Finally Being ‘Honest With Himself’ in New Memoir Filled With ‘Big Bombshells’
(via Us Magazine)Called it (tbf, everyone in this entire thread did)
I mean there’s no news of him dating a woman?
Also, research has suggested that the digit: ring finger ratio significantly differs between straight men and gay/bi men. I think some studies have indicated that men with an index finger the same size or longer than the ring finger are likely to identify as gay or bi.
I looked at the digit: ring finger ratio for Jackman. It appears that they are the same length.
Of course, I am sure there are exceptions. I don’t think the length of fingers is 100% an indicator of sexual orientation. If that were the case, it might have been widespread news and put a lot of us in danger.
I looked at the digit: ring finger ratio for Jackman. It appears that they are the same length.
Of course, I am sure there are exceptions. I don’t think the length of fingers is 100% an indicator of sexual orientation. If that were the case, it might have been widespread news and put a lot of us in danger.
These articles have not really made any coming out stories very subtle. Good for him if that’s what does end up happening!
Speedofan37
Mythical Member
Yeah there’s no need of him hooking up with a new woman. Usually, men start having sex almost immediately after splitting from a female partner. Liam Hemsworth, Joe Manganiello, Chris Pratt, etc. However, Hugh Jackman is not?
JackS23
Admired Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2023
- Posts
- 120
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 915
- Points
- 288
- Age
- 29
- Location
- Málaga, Andalusia,Spain
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Similar threads
