Jack Doherty

I have so much respect for Vitaly.....
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I have so much respect for Vitaly.....
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
For what? Shouting louder than Jack? Neither of them were coherent and it sounded like a playground argument.
 
This is the biggest issue with OF, Fansly or any other platform is there is no protection for the subscriber. The content creator states a video is xyz, but then after paying it's not even remotely close to what was stated. This is clearly fraud and those platforms should be reimbursing the costs to the subscriber and the creator should be penalised heavily.
 
This is the biggest issue with OF, Fansly or any other platform is there is no protection for the subscriber. The content creator states a video is xyz, but then after paying it's not even remotely close to what was stated. This is clearly fraud and those platforms should be reimbursing the costs to the subscriber and the creator should be penalised heavily.
Did OF not have a function where you can get your money back for PPV content if it is clearly fals advertising?
I read this last year on the Mark Thomas thread when he said he shows his dick and did not or something like this. Then the guy contacted the support and got his money back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thatoneguy90
Did OF not have a function where you can get your money back for PPV content if it is clearly fals advertising?
I read this last year on the Mark Thomas thread when he said he shows his dick and did not or something like this. Then the guy contacted the support and got his money back.
Usually but not always. You need to email them and they decide. They dont like a credit card chargeback, they will ban you from OF if you do that first. But people like Jack are expecting people to just not go through the steps. Its how grifters operate.