Jerking off while hunting

[malakos]

Fuck the vibrations... Damm enjoying that is like a silent pleasure. You know all the guys are felling that also... That's hot I forgot about that.

Sounds thrilling.

 

[SolK95]

I blew my boyfriend out in the woods a few times and we didn't have any problems.

Then again I live in California rather than Florida. :tongue:

We have a species of mosquito 2x the size of regular mosquito's.

 

[926835]

I love jerking while hunting. Alone. Bored. and free. Whip it out and blast off. Its relaxing.

 

[malakos]

We have a species of mosquito 2x the size of regular mosquito's.

And I hate the regular kind!

 

[Ed69]

That's a good way to spread your scent on the air current.I bet you tree fappers don't get to fill your tag often!LOL

 

[Almost40]

You can do it in the woods without hunting. Animals in the wild should be left alone. Stop hunting and keep wanking.

 

[malakos]

You can do it in the woods without hunting. Animals in the wild should be left alone. Stop hunting and keep wanking.

So it's better to stick animals in dark, cramped sheds where they can never move around to the point that their limbs atrophy?

 

[Trevor]

Kurt,

You might want to expand your thoughts beyond the hunting blind to include the hunting cabin. When you get a bunch of straight (?) guys away from their wives (and drinking) at the hunting cabin, they all seem to want to pull their dick out and do something with it.

I was thinking the same thing. I had some fun times with other guys on hunting trips when I was younger.

 

[JBisme]

I have had similar experiences to Kurt, especially with my cousin hunting when I was younger.

I have never met a guy that did not jerk off outdoors at least once. Rarely find any guy who has not done it with a close friend.


What did your cuz do when you started jerking?

 

[SolK95]

You can do it in the woods without hunting. Animals in the wild should be left alone. Stop hunting and keep wanking.

I think you're confused about the difference between Poaching (very bad) and hunting (population control).

Hunting is not simply going out into the woods with a gun and shooting something.

Hunting is a means of population control for the sake of the animals. Because we have destroyed their habitat and natural predators they tend to get out of control. When this happens disease and starvation become rampant until the population is back down and then repeats the cycle.

Hunting is a well organized mean to control the population to prevent them from starving and getting sick and then dying anyways.

Every year a population assessment is taken as well as numerous other studies to determine how many animals need to be removed to keep the population safe. They then assign a number of tags that a hunter can buy for each individual animal and thus limits the number, type, even size, of animals a hunter can take.

This does 2 things.

1. If the hunters didn't do it, the state/gov would. Otherwise disease among animals and animal related accidents would be a major issue. There goes taxpayer money

2. The money used to buy the tags tends to go towards conservation and the economy. And unlike taxes, the payer is getting a direct privilege for paying it, instead of it just coming out of the paycheck.

Poaching is the unlawful and unneeded killing of animals, endangered or not.

 

[JBisme]

Where I am from in Southwest Georgia deer and wild hogs are over populated. Hunters from Florida come up each year and harvest deer and hogs, in addition to local hunters. Still over 100 are hit on highways causing property loss and injuries. I hunt for meat from deer, I live off what I kill.

 

[travis7]

my brothers too me hunting.. while they stock the deer, I was to sit on a stump and see if they chased any my way.. bored and in a oversize coveralls. I was able to put my hand in the pocket close to my jeans, and reached in and and started to play with my dick. .. I couldn't see anything or hear anything.. but felt good to stroke my dick in the cool damp air of the mountains of Oregon. Left a load on the the top of the stump.. after that I would always offer to head out some place alone to watch for runners, and able to jo.. every time.

 

[deleted19883]

my brothers too me hunting.. while they stock the deer, I was to sit on a stump and see if they chased any my way.. bored and in a oversize coveralls. I was able to put my hand in the pocket close to my jeans, and reached in and and started to play with my dick. .. I couldn't see anything or hear anything.. but felt good to stroke my dick in the cool damp air of the mountains of Oregon. Left a load on the the top of the stump.. after that I would always offer to head out some place alone to watch for runners, and able to jo.. every time.

There you go great hunting story... Wonder if they let you go so they could do the same. Heheh...

 

[deleted19883]

I have had similar experiences to Kurt, especially with my cousin hunting when I was younger.

I have never met a guy that did not jerk off outdoors at least once. Rarely find any guy who has not done it with a close friend.


What did your cuz do when you started jerking?

I feel like this would be a great opportunity to fabricate into some awesome story since you asked. My cousin and I would would hunt the north woods while our dads hunted the east.

My cousin and I were the same age and to be honest since we were young we were like brothers. Spent summers at each other's houses etc. there wasent much we didn't know about each other . So agin to be honest.... We had already experimented before this. But this time it was more of a dude what the hell are you doing! Few laughs.

Ther you go I honestly didn't fabricate...

 

[LargeUnit]

I took a few of my gallery pics.......while mushroom hunting. Worked out good.....

 

[Almost40]

No Sheds my friend. I bet you didnt notice the word "in the wild".... There are no sheds in the wild. I dont know if you ever though that all animals were once wild before we domesticated them. This is the only way to be, on the loose, in the wild. And as to control of wildlife population, well, you can check the wolf re-introdution techique that took place in Yellowstone NP. Just take the time and you will see how balance can be obatined without harassing the eco system. You want more, the population explosion of the human population has never been controled by no goverment. We just keep expanding and expanding, taking more and more of wildlife's natural habitat. Who is going to control this population....

 

[SolK95]

You want more, the population explosion of the human population has never been controled by no goverment. We just keep expanding and expanding, taking more and more of wildlife's natural habitat. Who is going to control this population....

No one, so we have to take the alternative. This isn't the place for idealism and what if's. The issue is now, and clearly no one will control the human population, so you have to work with what you have. I don't see people petitioning the government to kill off people or regulate population? Until then, that excuse is irrelevant to the solution.

I think you still misunderstand, once wolf populations are up in areas, the prehunting season surveys WILL account for them and their needs and lower the tag count, if it's decided that deer don't need to be hunted, then it will be left as such, any good hunter will respect that.

 

[malakos]

So it's better to stick animals in dark, cramped sheds where they can never move around to the point that their limbs atrophy?

Almost40, are you a vegetarian?

 

[Almost40]

Yes. In fact a vegan, not using or buying anything made from animal products, silk, leather belts, shoes, etc. I never mentioned killing off anyone. Throughout human existence so far, little has been done to control the expansion of our habitat versus that of all other beings. And what we did was to take more and more of the habitat of the animals. Adding the technique of hunting, all other animals are only struggling to make it in what is left to them. Quite harsh. Like for example check the last 30 years history in Indonesia or during the post Soekarno years. Agricultural expansion has led to billions of dollars in profit. In order to accomplish that, vast areas of dense jungle vegetation had to be deforestated in order to clear up the land and prepare the ground for the rice paddy. The same method was used in Southern borneo, mostly between the provinces of Kalimantan Tengah and Selatan to start the palm tree plantation. I bet you know that Borneo is the only piece of land in the world that provides habitat to the second largerst primate in the wolrd, along with a little piece of land at the north western tip of Sumatra in Aceh region ( affected heavily by the 2004 undersea megathrust quake that generated a destructive tsunami). Deforestation and natural disasters have only led to a destruction of a big part of the land. Why should hunting be allowed the time there is already an irriversible change in the habitat of other creatures.... There is no need to controll the population of -since speaking of- orangutans for example, it is already limited. And in case it is not known, the lovely orangutan can't make it, unless there are tall trees around, as it is difficult for them to walk on the surface of the land. They grasp the flexible tree branches and move from one to another.
If you check other areas, like Patragonia, species introduced by man have harmed the enviroment. And then they start killing them. How naive is this.... If there was no human expansion in Patagonia, ther would be no disturbance of the wildlife and no need to take down the introduced animals, which was all wrong from the begining.
I know that many people will think it is strange to hear someone saying there should be a controll of population, but just check the history in many areas of the world and you will see how damaging was the human interference.

 

[malakos]

Alright, then we are one the same playing field (I'm vegan as well). When I first addressed you I asked a question:

So it's better to stick animals in dark, cramped sheds where they can never move around to the point that their limbs atrophy?

I ask this question because you seem to be attacking hunting for food, whereas I am defending it in a relative sense. I think hunting for food is far more ethical than the contemporary norm of factory farm meat. Do you disagree with that?