Kyle Krieger

[Gyojun]

Plese, any advice on how can i watch the video without upgrading? Please!

Reload the page when the clock strikes --:-3, --:-5, or --:-7.

 

[InkyDust777]

anyone willing to dm the butt challenge video?

 

[LuttleOne]

Yeah for me the moans and regular sounds are a turn on when it comes to sex, the music is a turn off.

 

[lalariri]

Is the video with Jett Wayne, recent? I didn't see people mentioning it here.

 

[Jjjjjjjo]

Is the video with Jett Wayne, recent? I didn't see people mentioning it here.

It’s old

 

[Zoiseth]

when is this site going to stop judging sex workers for deciding what they show and for what price. they make the content, price and the rules. if it bothers you, move along.

When are people like you going to stop trying to police what other members post? If their comments bother you move along!

 

[purplefreedom]

Has he ever shown his dick? Or is it still all softcore and angles?

 

[MikeshXYZ]

Has he ever shown his dick? Or is it still all softcore and angles?

He does show dick (not all the time) and few penetration angles but no cumshots.

 

[Hobben1234]

When are people like you going to stop trying to police what other members post? If their comments bother you move along!

Thank you a forum is a forum for a reason.

 

[bigboaster]

When are people like you going to stop trying to police what other members post? If their comments bother you move along!

There are ceetian things you can't say. This is a private website. Not a free for all. When will some of you learn that? Lol

 

[Hobben1234]

There are ceetian things you can't say. This is a private website. Not a free for all. When will some of you learn that? Lol

Most comments are about physical preferences . These are entertainers that sell their bodies and face people can comment as long as it’s not I’ll spirited

 

[bigboaster]

Most comments are about physical preferences . These are entertainers that sell their bodies and face people can comment as long as it’s not I’ll spirited

Sure but that's up to the mods to decide. It's not clear cut. The common suggestion is not be nasty and rude. But for some of y'all. That's asking too much. Lol.

 

[lukaeber]

If someone is unhappy with the quality or value of someone's OF, they can be unhappy, but the problem is people here have EXTREME levels of entitlement. Like people on this site can't even conceive of content creators having boundaries at all. Or the fact that typical rules of capitalism don't apply when it comes to creators setting their own prices. Like if one guy is willing to show his hole for $5 while a different guy is willing to show his for $100, people will say the more expensive guy is "scamming", which is completely untrue but people on this site don't care if their entitled attitude is logical or not.

The "typical rules of capitalism" don't say "price videos worth $2 at $100." Capitalism says prices are set by supply and demand. If you paid $5000 for a fake Rolex that was actually worth $0.50, would you not complain? Would that not be scamming? Or is that within the "typical rules of capitalism?"

How is that any different than an OF creator leading someone to believe that the video they are selling has content that is worth $100, when it is actually worth $2?

I'm exaggerating to get my point across, but your post makes no sense at all. Being a sex worker does not entitle someone to mislead people about what they are buying.

The worst thing is that OF actively promotes that kind of conduct by making it easy for models, often by default, to be non-transparent about what people are spending their money on. And they won't do anything about it after the fact.

 

[MikeshXYZ]

The "typical rules of capitalism" don't say "price videos worth $2 at $100." Capitalism says prices are set by supply and demand. If you paid $5000 for a fake Rolex that was actually worth $0.50, would you not complain? Would that not be scamming? Or is that within the "typical rules of capitalism?"

How is that any different than an OF creator leading someone to believe that the video they are selling has content that is worth $100, when it is actually worth $2?

I'm exaggerating to get my point across, but your post makes no sense at all. Being a sex worker does not entitle someone to mislead people about what they are buying.

The worst thing is that OF actively promotes that kind of conduct by making it easy for models, often by default, to be non-transparent about what people are spending their money on. And they won't do anything about it after the fact.

I totally agree because you actually don't know what you get before you pay the price and you cannot see even a comment of other buyers to make a proper decision upfront unless you check out forums like LPSG. I think it is totally fine to define a certain price from low to high as long as you are transparent about the content and let the buyer decide if it's worth for them.

 

[Hobben1234]

This would solve if we work a system to share content problem solved cut demanded

 

[Losahaha]

So sad the fact that his OF is so boring....

 

[Hobben1234]

It’s not boring we haven’t seeen the videos

 

[Iamyesyouareno]

The "typical rules of capitalism" don't say "price videos worth $2 at $100." Capitalism says prices are set by supply and demand. If you paid $5000 for a fake Rolex that was actually worth $0.50, would you not complain? Would that not be scamming? Or is that within the "typical rules of capitalism?"

How is that any different than an OF creator leading someone to believe that the video they are selling has content that is worth $100, when it is actually worth $2?

I'm exaggerating to get my point across, but your post makes no sense at all. Being a sex worker does not entitle someone to mislead people about what they are buying.

The worst thing is that OF actively promotes that kind of conduct by making it easy for models, often by default, to be non-transparent about what people are spending their money on. And they won't do anything about it after the fact.

I said that the typical rules of capitalism DON'T apply to OF creators setting their prices. Learn to read better, dude.

And you are missing my point entirely. What is worth $2 to you might be worth $100 to the creator selling it. You can't compare individual creators' pricings with something like Rolex watches, because every creator has arbitrary feelings about their own value. So you can't say something is a "scam" just because you disagree with the value some creator has placed upon themselves. "Misleading" only applies if they actually lie about the content, not just because you happen to think it's worth less than they do.

 

[bowietomars]

Did his page flopped or are people just not sharing content? Lol

 

[Hobben1234]

Did his page flopped or are people just not sharing content? Lol

People are just complaining about price