Artistic nudes are very different from porn regardless of where they're housed. We're not talking about administrators in an office at a large corporation, we're talking about dancers. Studios and directors that use nudity in their productions as long as it's tasteful. Maybe you're too horny and frustrated at not getting what you want to think about it clearly. I get it. I want him to hop on some dick and ride it til he's filled with loads of cum, but sadly he's straight. It is what it is
The one Picture, where he is behind an ass of someone, is not an artistic picture, thats porn.
I don't disagree, but it can be argued because you can't see anything. It doesn't really matter because the point is that he still hasn't scammed or lied because he said he wasn't going to to show even that. If anything he's shown more than he promised tbh
Because we've subscribed before. He doesn't show anything major, teases you, and then hides his ass behind a paywall while baiting you into thinking youre gonna get something good. Don't get me wrong, he's a sweet guy, but he's in it to get as much out of it as he can while revealing as little as possible. Perfectly fine if you want to see ab pics with the occasional ass tease. He does send some "naked" but covered up pics in private from time to time, whether youre currently subscribed or not.
Absolutely agree with the above. He is intentionally vague with his descriptions. Don’t waste your money.
Agreed. I stopped subbing to him when I bought the “seductive shower” vid that showed him naked in the thumbnail and when I bought it he was showing in his underwear. It was scammy behaviour and the last straw.
Yep. But he never showed anything that spicy before. Who knows, if he realizes it doesn't hurt his dancing career at all, that may change, as he seems to be quite the exhibitionist type.. Time will tell
