Live Streamers Bulge

A lot of them do actually seep. For any streams over an hour so, I believe they're sleeping (I mean who lays awake for 5-8 hours awake and doing nothing).
That said, i still think it is odd - I get sexual content involving two people being a no no for them. But someone saying 'I'm streaming this with the full knowledge that people might see my dick while i sleep"?, I don't see the problem in consent terms...
Genuine question - am I missing something or is the OF policy nonsensical?
It's nonsensical. Not just because there's indeed a massive difference between the owner of the account, by themselves, turning on the camera and going to sleep, and something that involves touching or taking advantage of a sleeping person without their knowledge. But also because it makes every form of roleplay in the realm of the sleeping or hypno kinks impossible.

I guess it's just so they can make sure nothing non-consensual slips through without having to do actual work and judge it per case. So, laziness.
 
It's nonsensical. Not just because there's indeed a massive difference between the owner of the account, by themselves, turning on the camera and going to sleep, and something that involves touching or taking advantage of a sleeping person without their knowledge. But also because it makes every form of roleplay in the realm of the sleeping or hypno kinks impossible.

I guess it's just so they can make sure nothing non-consensual slips through without having to do actual work and judge it per case. So, laziness.
My guess is bandwidth. If more creators did it, it would stress their already crappy servers