Markiplier

I understand that he mentioned tasteful nudes and stood upto his promise but he could’ve done much better than this... i mean it in terms of better picture quality (his ass crack is slightly blurry) and that his cock and nuts eaten by a shark pic is so small that it blurs when we zoom in. This was not worth the hours and hours of streaming his podcasts on different platforms, ATLEAST FOR ME. But again I’ll take whatever I get at this point. And please don’t come for me, this is just what I feel. But atleast he showed us his ass so that’s a plus point. I reckon he could surprise us with more as he might have saved the best ones for the last but as of now I’m not keeping my hopes high. I’m not disappointed but not satisfied either. Hope that makes sense.
 
Again, can you people have your petty Twitter-espque discussions somewhere else? Both sides are obnoxious at this point.

The OF is for charity, he flat out said these nudes would be in the vein of his calendar, there was a near-zero percent chance you were going to get hardcore erotic stuff, especially immediately.

Other people, stop being so easily baited and learn to ignore posts/posters you disagree with instead of flooding the thread with multiple text posts.

People are here to see his flesh. There are plenty of other places to have your inane arguments.

1670582292047.png
 
the mega defenders of markiplier, who come here as “vigilantes of justice”.
If everything he does seems so good to you and you have to always defend him.
Go pay for its content and don't see it here for free :).
What makes you think they dont pay?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheAndreaShow
It’s not even the amount of nudity that’s disappointing. It’s how not sexy it is. The pictures are about as hot as walking in on your uncle getting changed. This Michael Stokes photos isn't more naked than Markiplier’s pictures yet it’s still a lot hotter. He’s doing these weird campy low quality green screen shoots that make it a disappointment. The silliness & lack of quality of it is what’s a disappointment.
 

Attachments

It’s not even the amount of nudity that’s disappointing. It’s how not sexy it is. The pictures are about as hot as walking in on your uncle getting changed. This Michael Stokes photos isn't more naked than Markiplier’s pictures yet it’s still a lot hotter. He’s doing these weird campy low quality green screen shoots that make it a disappointment. The silliness & lack of quality of it is what’s a disappointment.
When will yall stop complaining? you knew this was exactly the type of pictures he said we should expect..