Maybe having a big dick doesn't help??

Zhuren

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Posts
574
Media
0
Likes
1,001
Points
488
Location
Oak Park (Michigan, United States)
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
The reason I ask is because: it seems like there are web pages and only fans accounts all over the place where they have guys who have really big equipment, but it seems like over 90% of it is solo work.

It seems like if it was such a big asset, there would be ladies lining up to get there vaginal canal challenged--and therefore, most of the content creators would have women who wanted to work with them.

Even the guys who are gay seem like they have mostly solo work.

There is one guy hunghedonist420 / hungcoloradohippie (extremely beautiful equipment!), and I think that he says he has been celibate for the past couple of years. (WTF?)

What are your thoughts on this?
 
Big dick is and isn't the desire panacea we seem to think it is. Honestly things like height, income, social status are better predictors of women's patronage with big dicks not coming into play until after those metrics are fulfilled...hence Jonah Falcon being a basement dweller in his moms house as opposed to the most sought after male pornstar.
When all things are considered equal I think a big dick can be an edge, but I think a "big" man, whether that refer to his physical proportions, or his figurative impact upon the world, will always outpace penis size in female attention whether that be relationships or even sex work. If unknown outliers do get female attention, it is made sure to be low key and not publicized.


hunghedonist420 / hungcoloradohippie
Let me ask does he seem the type based upon his non sexual appearance and demeanor to attract women in general? Or is his equipment the primary show?
 
everyone seems to be overlooking the fact that having a big dick won't compensate for a shitty personality. if you think that having a big dick is going to be enough to get girls to have sex with you (on camera!) then you probably spend a lot of time confused, whacking it at home by yourself.
 
everyone seems to be overlooking the fact that having a big dick won't compensate for a shitty personality. if you think that having a big dick is going to be enough to get girls to have sex with you (on camera!) then you probably spend a lot of time confused, whacking it at home by yourself.
I'd agree with you if not for what seems to be women's natural proclivity(especially during times of socioeconomic uncertainty) for attraction to men with shitty personalities. I agree a big dick is not enough on its own, but as I and many more men recognize in their youth, if you make it "big" in other metrics(height, income, social status) personality becomes a moot point until much later on when the consequences of a relationship(children, emotional trauma) are incurred.. Even within sex work circles the scandals and violations of a James Deen were massively undercut by his prior and somewhat ongoing popularity amongst female viewers.
I'm not trying to undercut personality, nor am I not encouraging men to not develop personality as it is an effective tool for other venues besides attraction, but an unfortunate truth is as long as you fulfill one of those big 3 "bigs"(height, income, and social status) exponentially more women are going to take a chance on your questionable personality, at which point, maybe the big dick becomes a determining factor in establishing the relationship.
For on camera stuff I think the same applies, I think the most women willing to do content with larger penises do so because the performer has notoriety(some sort of social status, also might tie in with his purported wealth) or he happens to be an especially sought after man(by women) outside of a porn setting anyways due to his appearance.
 
I'd agree with you if not for what seems to be women's natural proclivity(especially during times of socioeconomic uncertainty) for attraction to men with shitty personalities. I agree a big dick is not enough on its own, but as I and many more men recognize in their youth, if you make it "big" in other metrics(height, income, social status) personality becomes a moot point until much later on when the consequences of a relationship(children, emotional trauma) are incurred.. Even within sex work circles the scandals and violations of a James Deen were massively undercut by his prior and somewhat ongoing popularity amongst female viewers.
I'm not trying to undercut personality, nor am I not encouraging men to not develop personality as it is an effective tool for other venues besides attraction, but an unfortunate truth is as long as you fulfill one of those big 3 "bigs"(height, income, and social status) exponentially more women are going to take a chance on your questionable personality, at which point, maybe the big dick becomes a determining factor in establishing the relationship.
For on camera stuff I think the same applies, I think the most women willing to do content with larger penises do so because the performer has notoriety(some sort of social status, also might tie in with his purported wealth) or he happens to be an especially sought after man(by women) outside of a porn setting anyways due to his appearance.
Well said
 
The reason I ask is because: it seems like there are web pages and only fans accounts all over the place where they have guys who have really big equipment, but it seems like over 90% of it is solo work.

It seems like if it was such a big asset, there would be ladies lining up to get there vaginal canal challenged--and therefore, most of the content creators would have women who wanted to work with them.

Even the guys who are gay seem like they have mostly solo work.

There is one guy hunghedonist420 / hungcoloradohippie (extremely beautiful equipment!), and I think that he says he has been celibate for the past couple of years. (WTF?)

What are your thoughts on this?

I think the issue is much more the ease with which one can make videos or pictures alone. At any time, I could pull down my pants and record a video of my huge cock. It takes no coordination, no planning, etc, and people would still pay for it.

But if I want to make an OnlyFans collaboration, I need to first find a sex partner nearby who matches my type (not many) who also has a verified OnlyFans account and who also finds me attractive. Even in a huge city like Berlin, I find this very difficult even though my sex life is full. If we wanted a good film beyond just POV, I'd also need to coordinate with a filmographer and discuss terms and pricing with him. It's way more difficult than just producing solo content.

An example – in November of last year, I had 20 sexual partners. All of those twinks were very good looking. Some of them even made videos and pics with me. And absolutely none of them are on OnlyFans (so I can't post their stuff there) and none of them consented for me to publish their stuff online. My long, thick cock definitely helped me meet them, but it doesn't change my inability to publish the content we produced.
 
I agree. Big dicks are icing on the cake for women, and guys.

Some women don't like them as they can't accommodate them comfortably.

It makes them feel inadequate if they can't take it right away.

But many can work up to it over time and really enjoy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ViewingPleasure
I agree. Big dicks are icing on the cake for women, and guys.

Some women don't like them as they can't accommodate them comfortably.

It makes them feel inadequate if they can't take it right away.

But many can work up to it over time and really enjoy it.
Majority can’t handle a big dick even though they claim too. Most vaginas are meant for average to smaller size.
 
If big cocks were important to woman, then all men would have big cocks, evolutionarily speaking.
That's not necessarily true, at least not in the way I think you're implying. Penis size isn't the same type of trait like height, blood type, or hair/eye color where a simple chart can predict the expressed alleles of offspring. So even if there was an objectively identified sexual preference for big penises, it wouldn't necessarily spawn a new generation of big penised men. Secondly, most scientists allude to a dual mating strategy for women which preferences two diametrically opposed male archetypes in order to get the totality of their paradoxical desires fulfilled. To that end the attractive potential of penis size can be categorized as a plus in the primal mating theater, but a possible minus when it comes to civilized relationship security and child rearing. For all our Madonna/Whore issues we should probably work out, it's almost taboo on modern society to suggest maybe women have a more widespread Stud/Saint complex with farther reaching consequences.
 
If big cocks were important to woman, then all men would have big cocks, evolutionarily speaking.
Understanding that my previous post was highlighting the pitfalls of trying to use a correlation/causation argument concerning penis size preferences of women.....I do find it interesting that scientifically they are finding a trend that men's testosterone levels are going down, and our sperm counts are dropping, yet penis size is increasing....from a strictly Natural Selective standpoint that could imply that men are somehow adapting to the dual mating strategies of women, by trying to encompass opposing traits in one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zhuren
As my wife has said time and again: She’d love me no matter how small or big my dick is…but thank GOD it’s big.
 
It doesn't help. Women assess men based on social status not dick.

IOW women want men with coin. Money hasn't always existed in human history but high social status within tribes and clans has. This attraction is instinctual in females of our species.

The adaptive advantage which drives this instinct is reproductive success. Reproductive success for human females is becoming grandmothers. This requires at least two decades of resources. Coin. Not a male with a big dick.

The groupie phenomenon is the ultimate expression of this instinct in females of our species. Even if a groupie doesn't have the love child of the high social status male with whom she mates she finds him irresistible.

I do not access someone's sex life based on their OF account. The motivation for it is money, vanity or both.
 
Understanding that my previous post was highlighting the pitfalls of trying to use a correlation/causation argument concerning penis size preferences of women.....I do find it interesting that scientifically they are finding a trend that men's testosterone levels are going down, and our sperm counts are dropping, yet penis size is increasing....from a strictly Natural Selective standpoint that could imply that men are somehow adapting to the dual mating strategies of women, by trying to encompass opposing traits in one.
Interesting. What if size for so many women is too big and they'd rather only slightly larger so that they can take more thus increasing probability of successful pregnancy? If that big/hung/huge dick is shooting blanks, she just backed herself and the species into an evolutionary corner.
 
If big cocks were important to woman, then all men would have big cocks, evolutionarily speaking.

^This. And males of our species have huge cocks.

Gorillas are the largest primates in existence. Male gorillas have a three inch penis.

At five to six inches long and four in circumference on average human males have the largest penises of any primate.

In terms of evolutionary (really just adaptive) advantage within a species male and female genitalia are made to fit one another. All other aspects of reproductive systems being equal nothing more is required. :cool:
 
I think we have to keep in mind that it's only recently that unexperienced women had a concept of what an adult penis looks like.

Good girls married and accepted what they got. Most didn't know any different.

Male nudity used to be very forbidden, except in art, and even that was played down in terms of size so as not to offend the viewer.

Somewhere along the line it must have become an evolutionary advantage to have a large penis.

I suspect going forward average penises will become larger as most women need not live in ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MilfBanger78
IOW women want men with coin. Money hasn't always existed in human history but high social status within tribes and clans has. This attraction is instinctual in females of our species.
I'm betting the "men with coin" have something to say about this considering pool boys, personal trainers, and the modern concept of romance tend to muddle what it is women actually want(or what they do once they get it). It seems the instinctual attraction is dual pronged, seeking different men to fulfill different needs independent and often without knowledge of each other, as opposed to the male strategy of either trying to reconcile opposing needs within one woman, or seeking women, aware of each other, to fulfill those needs collectively.
 
The reason I ask is because: it seems like there are web pages and only fans accounts all over the place where they have guys who have really big equipment, but it seems like over 90% of it is solo work.
It seems like if it was such a big asset, there would be ladies lining up to get there vaginal canal challenged--and therefore, most of the content creators would have women who wanted to work with them. Even the guys who are gay seem like they have mostly solo work.
What are your thoughts on this?

Zhuren if you looked at the content and comments posted at lpsg by OF subscribers you'd find the vast majority are male. Those persons desire to see a physically fit male showing his body and/or solo sex, m2m sex shows for a price. They reveal OF to be a male-centric market largely supported by men viewing other men - hence "most of the content creators" don't need a lady present in order to profit. Making a profit is the objective and the content creator will have to work with the body he/she has in order to make it - with or without partners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zhuren