6.5*6 would be more than twice the volume of the average cock. So yeah, definitely way bigger.
Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
I've gained 1.5" over 10-12 years...started at 7 now 8.5". gained 3/4" inch in girth. Now 6.25". Takes time and consistency.
Can I see the scene where he is compared to the dildo? It is hard for me to believe Rocco is less than 7x6.
The insertable length thing has been covered a lot and it is not necessarily accurate. Often it is too high because companies lie, but if the dildo is an actual replica then it can be less than the true NBP because of anatomy and companies don't care as they just claim overall length anyway (balls are often getting in the way from the underside, I am not interested in arguing this point, it is proven as far as I'm concerned unless you think Manuel Ferrara is 5.5 inches), but if he compares it to his actual dick then I can adjust for that and deduce the true size anyway.
I know it gets tiresome when people are insisting guys "look" bigger than sizes they are demonstrated at, but I want to be sure here. Rocco is like the Michael Jordan of porn and his true size is very interesting. He certainly looks longer than say Nacho Vidal or maybe the same as Vidal at his absolute peak. He has referred to himself as the John Holmes of Europe for how big he is. I'm sure it's easy to dismiss it as what do you expect bragging porn stars to say and that a true 6.5x6 is still very big, but is he really "only" that size? He certainly comes across as 7x6 to me.
Interested to hear all opinions!
I know 2 scenes with dildo:
Rocco's POV 8 - Scene 1 - with Sasha Rose. From 25:00 to 27:00.
Rocco's Perfect Slaves 11 - Scene 3 - with Bree Haze and Natty Mellow. From 21:00 to 27:00. (Warning - Russian website). Or here whole film, look from 1:00:00 to 1:06:00.
Comparisons in this scenes are far from perfect, but i think it's possible to gauge his size.
Disagree about dildo molding but okay, let's just agree to disagree. About Manuel - no, he is not 5.5". I don't have any factual estimations for Manuel but from what i had seen he is 6"-6.25" in length.
Yeah, it's tiresome. Especially when guy gets measured at size below what most perceived him before measurement. Because there will be people who will immediately say that he was not fully hard and actually at least .5" longer (though this attitude almost disappeared from thread now). It's kinda defeats purpose of the thread.
I honestly don't understand why people take anything that pornstars say seriously. Barring late Billy Glide, they all talk complete nonsense about size, and Rocco is not different. What anyone looks like is interesting, but this is exactly why it's unreliable: different people have different estimations how someone "looks like". I personally never considered Rocco 7-incher.
The thing is why I said that about Manuel Ferrara is for years he had a 5.5 inch insertable official dildo, then he came with the new 6.5 inch one, in the new one you can see the balls do not hug the underside robbing insertable length like the old one. So how do you explain that?
My mind is flexible though, I am not sure on this. So what is your final verdict on this, Rocco at 6.5x6?
I will check out the scenes.
I haven't analized all Manuel's dildos so can't say anything about that. But the thing is, Manuel's case with 5.5" dildo is unique. No one else's dildo was proven to be smaller than actual size. Here's my unprofessional take: considering that insertable part of the dildo is supposed to be guy's whole NBP size i guess they screwed up when adding balls to insertable part and ended up robbing him of length (not more than 0.5"-0.75" though). I don't think if 5.5" one is wrong 6.5" is automatically correct size.
I'd say 6.5x6 is Rocco's max possible size. Personally i think he is either 6.5" or right below, clearly more than 6" in length. As for girth, i doubt he is 6" looking at this (he is less than 6" even with not full grip):
He is somewhere around 5.5"-5.75" i think.
I think you're right about the dildos. This is a pretty important development in analysis lol. I think the insertable length of the replica dildo is largely accurate now, because the balls on the underside appears in many, yet the insertable length matches up to what we have other evidence for their size in many cases (Shane at 7.5 for example). Someone before said they add the balls on after to line up with the NBP and I guess that's right. It appears they somehow screwed up with the first Manuel Ferrara one, in that one the balls almost seem embedded in the dick and maybe were not added on after.
I agree with you Manuel doesn't have to be 6.5 because the new one says so, just because the old one was wrong. It seems with some research that he took some creative liberty with the new one (the girth on it is super sized for example compared to the old one). He is probably around 6 to 6.25 inches long, similar in size to Mike Adriano.
I guess Rocco is 6.5 NBP, which is amazing.
- Clod,
Honestly I had the same thoughts as you beforehand, but now I'm convinced that Rocco is in fact about 6.5. I also agree that they add the balls after to those things lol.
Also, speaking of Shane, have you noticed that he's lost length lately? He seems to have gained weight like almost all pornstars from his "era" e.g. Mandingo and Lex. He's definitely 7 nbp now as opposed to 7.5 at his prime.
Its hard to believe that Rocco is only 6.5 NBP. For a long time I would have believed anywhere up to 7.25 for him.
Perhaps part of it is because of how straight his dick is. No curvature AFAIK.
Perhaps part of it is because of how straight his dick is. No curvature AFAIK.
Hi yes, Shane is around 7 long only and I think his erection quality is weaker, I am not so sure he is reaching 6.5 girth anymore. Mandingo lost some NBP as did Lex also.
I have done more research on the Rocco dildo, it was made in 2013 by Icon Brands, an American company. Sizes for the insertable given are 6.5 inches and 17 cm. I would guess 6.5 is the accurate figure (or something very close to that) and 17 cm is a slight round up, otherwise I would expect to see 6.75 given if 17 cm was the original measurement. Also being American, it makes sense they would measure in inches.
Rocco was in LA for large periods in 2012 and 2013 and the dildo does look like a very accurate replica to me. I have to disagree that his girth is less than the dildo, it looks accurate to me. I think, at least at the time the dildo was made, Rocco was more or less 6.5x6 NBP.
An argument could be made was Rocco bigger in his prime? We have spoken a lot about how bodyfat levels can make a difference in size, also with @JGUIDO. The thing is Rocco seemed to still be in decent shape when the dildo was made(and still kinda is now), in the last few years it looks like he has had a mild to moderate weight gain on and off but back in 2013 he looked pretty fit, I remember some people at the time saying it was incredible for a man near 50. He was known for being a stud and in great shape back in his prime, but by normal standards, not the super buff 21st century look. I don't really know how much better shape he was in in the 90s. It appears he always had a flattish stomach and some ab definition but not super lean.
Rocco around the time the dildo was made:
Rocco in his prime
Similar shape imo.
I noticed that Rocco looks a lot shorter from different angles. Every pornstar has better and worse angles, but some seem particularly revealing with Rocco.
Another thing I notice is his dick looks very similar length regardless of the shape he is in, even when you compare him to videos from just a couple years ago when he had actually gained weight. I think this is because he has a very low exit point, this tends to make people appear longer as the dick's starting point is from more "out of the body" then when it starts higher up the stomach. You can see he looks longer in the last pic where this feature of his anatomy is more on display.
Because of the low exit point, there may be less variation in size from stomach fat levels. He also has a very straight dick as noted before, it has a noticeable upward angle, but no curve to it.
6.5 is an astonishingly low figure for Rocco, and my final devil's advocate against this would be that if I were to measure my dick at an upward angle (I have about the same erection angle as Rocco) it would measure maybe 0.25 less than if I measure parallel to the floor. I sometimes wonder if when these replica dildos are made, this somehow plays a role, if the guys with upward angled dicks just insert their dick with little force into the mold at their natural upward angle, then it would be like measuring the dick incorrectly with it pointing up. The reason measuring parallel to the floor is correct, is because that is what is insertable in a girl's pussy or asshole as the dick when inside with force behind it fucking will go in as if it were parallel and straight to the floor. However, I wonder if when the dildos are made, and the guys just insert their pointed upwards dicks with low force, they get robbed of about 0.25 inches. I am not sure on the math/science of this and am open for someone else to explain this to me/ correct me.
I am convinced he is 6.5 to 6.75 but need a bit more convincing to settle on 6.5 for sure lol.
Darwinsurvival
Legendary Member
I am French ! On a French television, Rocco Siffredi said he was 23 cm at the time But damn what a mythomaniac he is barely 7 inches. I am longer than him.
@strivingforperfection
Low exit point definitely has an impact on NBP measurements IMO.
Look at Chris Strokes for example. Definitely a super low exit point and weight never affects his size.
And IMO a lot of the pornstars that are actually in the 7 inch range that people SWEAR are 8 inches or more have a low exit point. So it definitely affects how we perceive size.
Another good example would be Jax Slayher.
I know I myself have like a higher exit point and I swear depending on the time of day my NBP can go from anywhere from 7.25 to 7.75 to even rarely 8 if I am thin at that moment.
A low exit point is also better for cheating on side measurements. My side measurement is only .25 or so more than whatever I measure on top but with a lower exit point the ruler is capable of going much farther back. Like in that "10 inch" measurement Kira Pirez got for Jax Slayher.
Low exit point definitely has an impact on NBP measurements IMO.
Look at Chris Strokes for example. Definitely a super low exit point and weight never affects his size.
And IMO a lot of the pornstars that are actually in the 7 inch range that people SWEAR are 8 inches or more have a low exit point. So it definitely affects how we perceive size.
Another good example would be Jax Slayher.
I know I myself have like a higher exit point and I swear depending on the time of day my NBP can go from anywhere from 7.25 to 7.75 to even rarely 8 if I am thin at that moment.
A low exit point is also better for cheating on side measurements. My side measurement is only .25 or so more than whatever I measure on top but with a lower exit point the ruler is capable of going much farther back. Like in that "10 inch" measurement Kira Pirez got for Jax Slayher.
- Clod,
Would a low exit point explain why some people can have higher body fat that doesn’t impact their nbp length as severely? Also, I do have to say that whiles Strokes has an identical nbp & bp length, he’s been less lean recently & has clearly lost a smidge of nbp length as a result.
I had the sheer and ultimate pleasure to meet Antonio Biaggi, 2ce, and his true measurement was a clear 9.5 uncut and thick. The thing is most people perceive muscular guys to be well endowed and also call a 7 inch thick dick, an 8! I learnt a long time ago when I hooked up with this guy who told me on internet that he was 7 inches and I may not like...needless to say, the fucker got it all wrong because 7 was big and delicious...
Beautiful story.
Similar threads
