Michael hoffman

Let’s just avoid deeming anyone “gay” or “not ‘gay”. Some of y’all are way too quick to hand out or reject identities for people you don’t know. Stop being so damn basic. Stop focusing so much on identities. And stop filtering everyone through your own fantasies or your own ideas of them. And that includes the folks so quick to say how “straight” or “not ‘gay” somebody is.

Michael is likely in the queer spectrum. But no one knows the dimensions of his sexuality, sexual journey, preferences, where he is in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, relationship, commitment spectrum. What is apparent is that the dude has struggled some mental health and insecurity issues.
ok? he's not gay and thats my opinion
 
ok? he's not gay and thats my opinion

You didn’t say “that’s my opinion”. You gave him an identity and presented like you know his factual dimensions. Have we not learned better than to keep giving people identities and making broad assumptions about their dimensions? You can guess. You can speculate. But don’t try to present shit as if they’re facts. The amount of dimensions, manipulation, struggles, insecurities, mental health issues, fluidity, contradictions, fetishes, paraphiliacs, hyper-sexuality, degrees of a-sexuality, the vastness of the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum- we should really just know better by now. And no matter what identity you’re trying to give someone or whatever you’re trying to state as factual it’s always gonna end up contributing to homophobia, gay panic, internalized phobias, “straight” worship, non homo superiority, misinformation, etc. So, it’s best to just not speak about people as if you know their identities and also like you’re in their minds and know all of their dimensions. I don’t know why that practice is still so common.
 
You didn’t say “that’s my opinion”. You gave him an identity and presented like you know his factual dimensions. Have we not learned better than to keep giving people identities and making broad assumptions about their dimensions? You can guess. You can speculate. But don’t try to present shit as if they’re facts. The amount of dimensions, manipulation, struggles, insecurities, mental health issues, fluidity, contradictions, fetishes, paraphiliacs, hyper-sexuality, degrees of a-sexuality, the vastness of the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum- we should really just know better by now. And no matter what identity you’re trying to give someone or whatever you’re trying to state as factual it’s always gonna end up contributing to homophobia, gay panic, internalized phobias, “straight” worship, non homo superiority, misinformation, etc. So, it’s best to just not speak about people as if you know their identities and also like you’re in their minds and know all of their dimensions. I don’t know why that practice is still so common.
not reading all that im sorry it happened
 
New to this thread here, I remember Michael back in 2012 as a kid with a great 8 pack and smile. I missed his years in porn but lost interest in him after he was over taken by tattoos. I know he has struggled since then and I hope he finds his way, I still remember his flexing videos. Does anyone have videos of his nudes before he got so many tattoos?
 
New to this thread here, I remember Michael back in 2012 as a kid with a great 8 pack and smile. I missed his years in porn but lost interest in him after he was over taken by tattoos. I know he has struggled since then and I hope he finds his way, I still remember his flexing videos. Does anyone have videos of his nudes before he got so many tattoos?
Careful with how far back you go. He had tattoos before he was 18.