I wonder if he spends so much money keeping people from publishing his nudes that he HAS to cover that cost by overcharging? As I've noted before, he did a lot of nude work at beaches and in backyard pool areas. There is NO way that some random photographer didn't get at least ONE photo of his little Yerger.
 
He sent a set of pictures a couple of days ago for $99, saying it shows "Bare HARD cock" action. Has anyone bought them, and if so, do they actually show hard cock? For that much, really want to know before I buy.
There are almost 9,000 posts on this thread...most of them warning that this guy is a scammer and a liar. So I'm gonna guess NO, he's not showing his hard cock. Maybe the shadow of it, maybe thru underwear, maybe it's hiding behind something
 
l
He won't show it for $99? What price would one have to pay to actually see it? Asking for a friend...
I do not remember clearly, but I think we have people in this thread testifying they have spent more than 4 figures overall on him and he still did not show anything. I’m not saying he is not showing his cock, but if he does it’s very likely for very high 4 figures and even 5 figures IF he does, but that’s just what I think, it’s not something I can confirm.
 
He sent a set of pictures a couple of days ago for $99, saying it shows "Bare HARD cock" action. Has anyone bought them, and if so, do they actually show hard cock? For that much, really want to know before I buy.
How many times we gonna say this YOU CAN SEE HIS HARD COCK JUST HAVE TO GOOGLE IT FFS lol
 
How many times we gonna say this YOU CAN SEE HIS HARD COCK JUST HAVE TO GOOGLE IT FFS lol
Amen. Such gluttons for punishment. We been done had the post-Survivor nudes hard cock leak and now the half-ass Bridges of Pinellas County-ass limpdick photos.

One can only be so underwhelmed!
I get it though. It's the "Cartmanland Syndrome", from that South Park episode, where Cartman bought the theme park but only he could ride the rides–until he had to hire security and then maintenance, and had to gradually let a couple more visitors in every few days.

All that stalling for Yerger dick has stirred up mass desire, so one person wastes their money, WOMP WOMP. A month later, another overpriced PPV; oh sing it Liza.....maybe this time......I'll be lucky...........maybe this time, he'llllll fapppppp.....oh. WOMP WOMP. Lather, rinse, repeat.

"Perhaps he really showed it THIS TIME!"
"He'll show it TO ME."

Oy. Have the fortitude, y'all. To rise up (not our cocks) and say........
9hsGAU5.gif
 
I know I'm getting older, because I find myself wishing he had no tatts.
I don't think it's age. There is natural urge to reveal the nakedness (skin) of one's object of interest. Tats act as adornments to the eyes. You are taken in by them. The eventual disappointment is the discovery that you will NEVER see that person's nakedness.
 
recent magazine pics on ig. first two are my favorite
These photos are so hot. Michael is a divine beauty it's truly mesmerizing. There's an androgynousness to his masculinity that makes him so fucking erotic. These pics sent me into a fucking spell yesterday. I didn't realize how powerful Yerger is but man one look at his beautiful bare ass and those droopy lips and I was feral
 
These photos are so hot. Michael is a divine beauty it's truly mesmerizing. There's an androgynousness to his masculinity that makes him so fucking erotic. These pics sent me into a fucking spell yesterday. I didn't realize how powerful Yerger is but man one look at his beautiful bare ass and those droopy lips and I was feral
androgynous?? theres honestly nothing androgynous about michael yerger; hes far from it. i think most people would agree that hes quite the opposite: hyper masculine. what part about a beefy, heavily muscular man with tattoos, body and facial hair, and a buzz cut is androgynous? his clothing isnt gender neutral either lol