So wait, we cant share anymore pics or videos anymore?
We can they will be taken down tho, nut if you ask me he has more revealing stuff from modelling than he does in OF (Better quality too) so its not worth much subscribing or sharing OF content.

All of this are Public modelling shots not any of this pictures is subject to DMCA or any kind of copyright, none of this is from Michael Only Fans or any other private source, the last one is a fake but is a good enough fake to share
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We can they will be taken down tho, nut if you ask me he has more revealing stuff from modelling than he does in OF (Better quality too) so its not worth much subscribing or sharing OF content.

All of this are Public modelling shots not any of this pictures is subject to DMCA or any kind of copyright, none of this is from Michael Only Fans or any other private source, the last one is a fake but is a good enough fake to share

View attachment 68000601
View attachment 68000731


View attachment 68000781

View attachment 68000891
Except that’s not how it works and he’s literally posted three of these images on his OF. In the grand scheme of things it’s not really important nothing that’s been posted isn’t hard to find on the internet.
 
All of this are Public modelling shots not any of this pictures is subject to DMCA or any kind of copyright, none of this is from Michael Only Fans or any other private source, the last one is a fake but is a good enough fake to share
Someone owns the copyright to all those images ... and you're not that person.
Every single one of them can have a DMCA Takedown Notice placed against them.
And if they do, they'll be removed, you'll get a warning and earn points towards being banned.
Count on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted5830701
We can they will be taken down tho, nut if you ask me he has more revealing stuff from modelling than he does in OF (Better quality too) so its not worth much subscribing or sharing OF content.

All of this are Public modelling shots not any of this pictures is subject to DMCA or any kind of copyright, none of this is from Michael Only Fans or any other private source, the last one is a fake but is a good enough fake to share

View attachment 68000601
View attachment 68000731


View attachment 68000781

View attachment 68000891
You clearly don't understand copyright law ... at all.
 
He sent me a DMCA notice for my posts! Then I see he is teary-eyed on his Instagram stories. Interesting.
Somehow i believe you still have a big heart not leaking all of his most explicit content.. i mean 7000 dollars for nothing, you must be kidding me, hehe ;)
 
Michael’s popularity hasn’t grown on Only Fans at all, but it has stayed stagnant at 1,000 likes a photo which means a lot of gays are content with paying $40 for faux-ass pics. I will not be giving him any more of my $. My worshipping of muscle-y straight guys has more to do with my childhood trauma of being abused by them than it does actually genuinely being attracted to that kind of men. It’s not for me anymore. Y’all can enjoy though.
 
We can they will be taken down tho, nut if you ask me he has more revealing stuff from modelling than he does in OF (Better quality too) so its not worth much subscribing or sharing OF content.

All of this are Public modelling shots not any of this pictures is subject to DMCA or any kind of copyright, none of this is from Michael Only Fans or any other private source, the last one is a fake but is a good enough fake to share

View attachment 68000601
View attachment 68000731


View attachment 68000781

View attachment 68000891
Because they put effort on making a transition instead of pasting parts like most fakes. This one could use some glow below, or mate in the upper region.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Denyaku
How many people around the world has spent 7k/year for this guy?
He is smart and know how to squeeze money out of thirsty gaymen, by doing the bar minimum. And its psychological too. U feel priveledge to pay 50/150 to access a picture. It's not buying, as u don't own them.
I think we as consumer should not favor a trend that unfortunetely leads to getting scammed. I susbscribed and i paid the bar minimum till i realise it was not smart from me to let myself be used like that. Cause sometimes the description does not match the content,
 
I hope I’m wrong. But I’ll bet he’s nude. he will have his hand over it or an something propped in a way where you can’t see anything

How many people around the world has spent 7k/year for this guy?
He is smart and know how to squeeze money out of thirsty gaymen, by doing the bar minimum. And its psychological too. U feel priveledge to pay 50/150 to access a picture. It's not buying, as u don't own them.
I think we as consumer should not favor a trend that unfortunetely leads to getting scammed. I susbscribed and i paid the bar minimum till i realise it was not smart from me to let myself be used like that. Cause sometimes the description does not match the content,
Ya, i felt like both of u, i spend money for him, but cant see him nude, always have an something propped, that's the reason i ask who confirm will we see him nude with 18$ of his new message.