Nacho Vidal

In 2017 he sued a Colombian male doctor that played with his cock during an examination.

In a radio interview Nacho says he got iron-hard when the doctor touched it because he takes pills to get erections easier, so the "poor" man believed Nacho was enjoying it and kept going.

Hot to know a man grabbed that big cock lol
 
In 2017 he sued a Colombian male doctor that played with his cock during an examination.

In a radio interview Nacho says he got iron-hard when the doctor touched it because he takes pills to get erections easier, so the "poor" man believed Nacho was enjoying it and kept going.

Hot to know a man grabbed that big cock lol
Any more juicy details on that?
I mean it sounds like Nacho let him play a little bit...
 
Any more juicy details on that?
I mean it sounds like Nacho let him play a little bit...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
In 2017 he sued a Colombian male doctor that played with his cock during an examination.

In a radio interview Nacho says he got iron-hard when the doctor touched it because he takes pills to get erections easier, so the "poor" man believed Nacho was enjoying it and kept going.

Hot to know a man grabbed that big cock lol
That's not how viagra works.. you have to be aroused for them to work.. blocking nitrogenoxide
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I had to rely on the automatic English translation so I'm not sure I got it all...

Anyways, it is an unethical situation for sure but there is something strange about this...
I personally would not have let a doctor "examine" my dick and balls, twice, if I came in for ear problems.
There is also a possibility that Nacho lead the doctor on so he can sue the hospital. I mean he patiently let him examine his erect penis and erections don't come without arousal, not even with viagra and such stuff. He is not a teenager to get accidental erections. And even if it was an accidental erection, why did he not just tell that to the doctor like: Oh Im sorry about this, its these pills Im taking, for instance...
Malpractice in the medical field happens every day but in the EU countries, where you have universal health care, patients very often sue doctors, dentists and hospitals for malpractice to get good money or often just to get out of paying a bill, if there is one, because its taken very seriously...
To me it seems that Nacho had a lawsuit in his mind already while the doctor was playing with his cock, if not even before he went to the hospital. That being said, the doctor was still wrong and unethical, even if he was deceived....
 
  • Like
Reactions: brunosilva
I had to rely on the automatic English translation so I'm not sure I got it all...

Anyways, it is an unethical situation for sure but there is something strange about this...
I personally would not have let a doctor "examine" my dick and balls, twice, if I came in for ear problems.
There is also a possibility that Nacho lead the doctor on so he can sue the hospital. I mean he patiently let him examine his erect penis and erections don't come without arousal, not even with viagra and such stuff. He is not a teenager to get accidental erections. And even if it was an accidental erection, why did he not just tell that to the doctor like: Oh Im sorry about this, its these pills Im taking, for instance...
Malpractice in the medical field happens every day but in the EU countries, where you have universal health care, patients very often sue doctors, dentists and hospitals for malpractice to get good money or often just to get out of paying a bill, if there is one, because its taken very seriously...
To me it seems that Nacho had a lawsuit in his mind already while the doctor was playing with his cock, if not even before he went to the hospital. That being said, the doctor was still wrong and unethical, even if he was deceived....
Yo pienso similar, es ridículo que te hagan todo lo que le hicieron a él, supuestamente, y no digas nada y te dejes.
Si vas por ayuda para los oídos y te hacen eso, paras la situación, no la sigues y más sabiendo que está mal
 
Yo pienso similar, es ridículo que te hagan todo lo que le hicieron a él, supuestamente, y no digas nada y te dejes.
Si vas por ayuda para los oídos y te hacen eso, paras la situación, no la sigues y más sabiendo que está mal
yeah, frankly, I believe him. I understand the scam element, suing, etc., but he has a great deal of money both from porn and from his investments and business dealings. He makes plain that he is reporting the man on behalf of others who he assumes have been harmed by the physician; whether correctly or incorrectly matters little in this context since whether he is correct or not is immaterial to the wrong done. I personally think it could very well be likely that the physician fondled him precisely because he was famous and may have not done the same thing to other patients since there is no morbid curiosity with an ordinary person; get a porn star legend known explicitly for his glorious penis and we may have another story. Moreover, he's well known for directing gay videos, for going as far to the edge with it as possible for a straight male, especially a male pornstar from his era, so I think he's perfectly fine with sex and his sexuality; it's just obvious that he didn't think the moment was right, that every encounter must be completely consensual – it may not be the homoerotic component he objected to since his friend was in the room and he was there for an ear inspection – and that it would have to be him initiating things, not getting accosted in an examination room. Sounds like he corrected a little injustice in the world; we should just add it to the list of great things Vidal's done over the years; more than anything it just rounds-out his character in a good way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P.J.9
yeah, frankly, I believe him. I understand the scam element, suing, etc., but he has a great deal of money both from porn and from his investments and business dealings. He makes plain that he is reporting the man on behalf of others who he assumes have been harmed by the physician; whether correctly or incorrectly matters little in this context since whether he is correct or not is immaterial to the wrong done. I personally think it could very well be likely that the physician fondled him precisely because he was famous and may have not done the same thing to other patients since there is no morbid curiosity with an ordinary person; get a porn star legend known explicitly for his glorious penis and we may have another story. Moreover, he's well known for directing gay videos, for going as far to the edge with it as possible for a straight male, especially a male pornstar from his era, so I think he's perfectly fine with sex and his sexuality; it's just obvious that he didn't think the moment was right, that every encounter must be completely consensual – it may not be the homoerotic component he objected to since his friend was in the room and he was there for an ear inspection – and that it would have to be him initiating things, not getting accosted in an examination room. Sounds like he corrected a little injustice in the world; we should just add it to the list of great things Vidal's done over the years; more than anything it just rounds-out his character in a good way.
En realidad casi siempre hace queer baiting, ha hecho incluso comentarios sobre que estaba cansado de hacer lo que gays le pedían por onlyfans.
También mintió cuando decía de grabar porno gay y casualmente ahí apareció su enfermedad.
Casualmente su enfermedad apareció cuando “iba a grabar porno gay”
 
En realidad casi siempre hace queer baiting, ha hecho incluso comentarios sobre que estaba cansado de hacer lo que gays le pedían por onlyfans.
También mintió cuando decía de grabar porno gay y casualmente ahí apareció su enfermedad.
Casualmente su enfermedad apareció cuando “iba a grabar porno gay”
No, I disagree. One, charging him with 'queer baiting' is absurd, especially for a world famous HETERO-sexual cisgender male pornstar who was best and most known during a time when gays loved straight men who were queer-eye friendly, that is, when societies were so homophobic that just being known for being popular with gays, being well-liked by them, was itself a loss to one's prestige and social standing. Do you recognize how much of an Ally someone like Nacho Vidal has been?… opening up the space for heterosexual men to acknowledge their desirability, to be more heteroflexible, to admit their attraction to transwomen, etc.?! You've completely lost perspective! Two, do you really think that Vidal & Siffredi & Ferrara, etc., have not experimented with homosexuality/bisexuality… do you actually not understand that these terms or labels or identities would be largely meaningless or insignificant for them given all that they have seen and how easy sex and sexuality is for them compared to broader society? Why even assume that these terms or labels or identities are profoundly meaningful to them? I hope you do realize that many, many, 'straight' men in porn, if, indeed, they are actually heterosexual, also are capable of doing a lot more than just that; the problem is that there are different testing protocols, or at least there were in the past. In addition to differing procedures and protocols, there were differing studios and studio interests, in addition to the fear over HIV/AIDS, STI's (or STD's as they were known then). Moreover, there were differing markets and market capacities and demands that meant that the 'gay' side of the porn industry at its height was strictly separated from the 'straight' side and it was a scandal whensoever someone was 'discovered' as having been on both sides. It would actually interesting to locate in figures like Vidal, the seed of the changes we've seen and celebrate him for his contributions to those developments.
 
Last edited:
No, I disagree. One, charging him with 'queer baiting' is absurd, especially for a world famous HETERO-sexual cisgender male pornstar who was best and most known during a time when gays loved straight men who were queer-eye friendly, that is, when societies were so homophobic that just being known for being popular with gays, being well-liked by them, was itself a loss to one's prestige and social standing. Do you recognize how much of an Ally someone like Nacho Vidal has been?… opening up the space for heterosexual men to acknowledge their desirability, to be more heteroflexible, to admit their attraction to transwomen, etc.?! You've completely lost perspective! Two, do you really think that Vidal & Siffredi & Ferrara, etc., have not experimented with homosexuality/bisexuality… do you actually not understand that these terms or labels or identities would be largely meaningless or insignificant for them given all that they have seen and how easy sex and sexuality is for them compared to broader society? Why even assume that these terms or labels or identities are profoundly meaningful to them? I hope you do realize that many, many, 'straight' men in porn, if, indeed, they are actually heterosexual, also are capable of doing a lot more than just that; the problem is that there are different testing protocols, or at least there were in the past. In addition to differing procedures and protocols, there were differing studios and studio interests, in addition to the fear over HIV/AIDS, STI's (or STD's as they were known then). Moreover, there were differing markets and market capacities and demands that meant that the 'gay' side of the porn industry at its height was strictly separated from the 'straight' side and it was a scandal whensoever someone was 'discovered' as having been on both sides. It would actually interesting to locate in figures like Vidal, the seed of the changes we've seen and celebrate him for his contributions to those developments.
Ehm… xD sigue siendo queer baiting.
Si no lo ves es tu problema.
Siempre ha dicho comentarios negativos en cuanto el hacer porno gay y casualmente cuando iba a grabar algo porno gay le salió una enfermedad. Casualmente justo cuando lo iba a grabar.
 
Again, the onus is on you to define 'queer baiting' and to do so in such a way that it makes some sense than it does not. Right now, you are trying to make a man who has repeatedly sought to arouse his gay fans, who has invited them to objectify him, appear to be 'baiting' gays, firstly, and, secondly, for no reason or purpose other than a malevolent one. Firstly, as to 'baiting' –– one cannot be baited if and when one is willing to seek out the so-called bait or, in other words, there can be no such 'thing' as willing bait. Bait by definition is a lure, a deception, pulled on another; in the parlance of the day, it is a trick pulled on someone without their consent. Secondly, as to the purpose, again, if he gets what he wants/needs and his fans are pleased, they do not need your faux heroics. Your understanding is nonsensical and it most likely has to do with your inability to understand these concepts.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Gaelicus
Again, the onus is on you to define 'queer baiting' and to do so in such a way that it makes some sense than it does not. Right now, you are trying to make a man who has repeatedly sought to arouse his gay fans, who has invited them to objectify him, appear to be 'baiting' gays, firstly, and, secondly, for no reason or purpose other than a malevolent one. Firstly, as to 'baiting' –– one cannot be baited if and when one is willing to seek out the so-called bait or, in other words, there can be no such 'thing' as willing bait. Bait by definition is a lure, a deception, pulled on another; in the parlance of the day, it is a trick pulled on someone without their consent. Secondly, as to the purpose, again, if he gets what he wants/needs and his fans are pleased, they do not need your faux heroics. Your understanding is nonsensical and it most likely has to do with your inability to understand these concepts.
Girl!! Lol enough! He loves trans though A LOT and not gay boys ..oppps
 
Again, the onus is on you to define 'queer baiting' and to do so in such a way that it makes some sense than it does not. Right now, you are trying to make a man who has repeatedly sought to arouse his gay fans, who has invited them to objectify him, appear to be 'baiting' gays, firstly, and, secondly, for no reason or purpose other than a malevolent one. Firstly, as to 'baiting' –– one cannot be baited if and when one is willing to seek out the so-called bait or, in other words, there can be no such 'thing' as willing bait. Bait by definition is a lure, a deception, pulled on another; in the parlance of the day, it is a trick pulled on someone without their consent. Secondly, as to the purpose, again, if he gets what he wants/needs and his fans are pleased, they do not need your faux heroics. Your understanding is nonsensical and it most likely has to do with your inability to understand these concepts.
XDD
Te repito: él mismo engaño a sus fans gays cuando saco un vídeo de que iba a grabar porno gay y casualmente al poco tiempo dijo que tenía una enfermedad y que dejaba el porno.
(pero siguió grabando porno hetero y porno con trans)
Eso es queer baiting.
A mi me parece que perfecto que él no quiera tener relaciones con hombres y solo tenerlas con personas trans o con mujeres hetero, pero que no engañe a la gente alegando que hará porno gay siendo mentira solo para conseguir el dinero de la gente que pago esperando que hiciese ese porno gay que el mismo prometio.

Incluso tiene contenido en entrevistas donde el mismo dice que está harto de que los gays le pidan hacer cosas en su onlyfans.
Nacho girl! Si estás cansado de los gays dilo claro y no sigas robándoles su dinero!
 
XDD
Te repito: él mismo engaño a sus fans gays cuando saco un vídeo de que iba a grabar porno gay y casualmente al poco tiempo dijo que tenía una enfermedad y que dejaba el porno.
(pero siguió grabando porno hetero y porno con trans)
Eso es queer baiting.
A mi me parece que perfecto que él no quiera tener relaciones con hombres y solo tenerlas con personas trans o con mujeres hetero, pero que no engañe a la gente alegando que hará porno gay siendo mentira solo para conseguir el dinero de la gente que pago esperando que hiciese ese porno gay que el mismo prometio.

Incluso tiene contenido en entrevistas donde el mismo dice que está harto de que los gays le pidan hacer cosas en su onlyfans.
Nacho girl! Si estás cansado de los gays dilo claro y no sigas robándoles su dinero!
Creo recordar en una entrevista que dijo que se ha follado a tíos muy femeninos que no eran trans.
 
Creo recordar en una entrevista que dijo que se ha follado a tíos muy femeninos que no eran trans.
Si, lo dijo en varias.
Pero como con todo y más con este actor en cuestión, si no se ve… Creerse las cosas poco.
Esto como cuando te enseñan una “follada”, si son todo planos donde no se ve la penetracion y esquivan enseñar algo, no hay penetracion.