he is so f***ing adorable.
he is so f***ing adorable.
different look still yummy
His serious expression with that furrowed brow is always so hot to me. Lol.
He isn't a huge 'built-built' guy, but look at that vein in his arm. whoa.
why do guys have to be built?He isn't a huge 'built-built' guy, but look at that vein in his arm. whoa.
They don't! Just meant to say that is was odd to see a feature of built guy on him. Misunderstood observation i guess.why do guys have to be built?
he sure played a good bad guy in it being the hater of gay people.They don't! Just meant to say that is was odd to see a feature of built guy on him. Misunderstood observation i guess.
he's pretty muscular, anyone who has seen him shirtless can see he's fit. he's just more lean instead of having bulging musclesThey don't! Just meant to say that is was odd to see a feature of built guy on him. Misunderstood observation i guess.
I didn’t until now and yes! He would be great in those roles!Does anyone else see him playing David Bowie in a biopic or possibly Jareth in a sequel to Labyrinth?
I wouldn't come up for air ever if given a chance with him.Nicholas sporting a nice bulge. Or you guys think it's a fold?
he sure played a good bad guy in it being the hater of gay people.
why wasnt that in the film or in both filmsHenry Bowers in the book has a mutual masturbation session with one of his friends, so it's possible there's some internalized homophobia going on with the character.
Probably because they both are supposed to be 12 in the novel and the other boy is a crazy psycho who killed his baby brother and keeps dead animals he kills himself in a fridge. It’s also implied that Patrick was molesting Henry during that part and he fights back after being offered oral sex. They cut that character off the film almost entirely probably because of censorship as it could‘ve been pretty upsetting for viewers.why wasnt that in the film or in both films
How is that acceptable in the books but not in the movie? I am sure they can do it but do it in a tasteful way.Probably because they both are supposed to be 12 in the novel and the other boy is a crazy psycho who killed his baby brother and keeps dead animals he kills himself in a fridge. It’s also implied that Patrick was molesting Henry during that part and he fights back after being offered oral sex. They cut that character off the film almost entirely probably because of censorship as it could‘ve been pretty upsetting for viewers.
there's no point...How is that acceptable in the books but not in the movie? I am sure they can do it but do it in a tasteful way.
yeah there is since there is a ton of stuff that never got in the film/there's no point...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.