I think, ultimately, that is the dumbest thing I've expended brain power to think about today (and that's saying something since I've been reading articles on Cracked.com most of the day.)
My axiom boils down to this; All people, everywhere, should be free to do whatever they want so long as what they're doing doesn't hurt anyone and isn't infringing upon someone else's ability to do the same thing.
That includes marriage. Arguments about "societal degradation" and "moral impurity" cannot be qualified through any meaningful metric and so I dismiss them and illogical and irrelevant. With that applied to every scenario I come across in terms of being asked what I think about this or that... the world is a less complex place in terms of the way I interact with it.
This
particular query struck me as
particularly silly based on the fact that it is extremely unlikely to
ever be a significant issue and secondly, would be perfectly legal and thus unstoppable in the eyes of the law, as they are written. So there isn't likely to be much of a kerfuffle here and even if there were, socially speaking, there wouldn't be one legally.
So, in at least three ways, this (to me personally) is completely moot. This reply has more substance that my actual opinion on the matter.
JSZ