I too like these as well, they are very comfy and have turned into my laundry day briefs
Pouch underwear for well endowed
- Thread starter t_o
- Start date
I too like these as well, they are very comfy and have turned into my laundry day briefs
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2001
- Posts
- 824
- Media
- 34
- Likes
- 3,547
- Points
- 748
- Location
- New Hampshire + Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
I'm a big fan of briefs with a pouch in front. While I'm definitely a "shower" -- usually about 6.5" soft, and thick -- it's the size of my balls that really makes a pouch essential. (Mine are about 2.5" diameter apiece; my wife compares them to plums.) I'm also quite muscular (5'7 and 195 lbs.), so without some sturdy separation of things down there, I end up with way too much sweaty/itchy scrotum-thighs contact.
Obviously was the first brand I tried, and I continue to love some of my older pairs. They are extraordinarily comfortable for a guy built like me, with a very generous pouch and extremely stretchy yet supportive fabric. I moved away from them because delivery from the company, in Australia, was slow/expensive (they are probably now available from many places other than obviously.com.au, but this was not the case circa 2010). More importantly, the company evolved away from largely hung-friendly products into underwear geared toward more average guys, and I find to difficult to ascertain on their website which styles are the older, hung-appropriate ones. I don't want to spend $25 for a pair of briefs, plus shipping, only to realize that it's a similar but more mainstream style.
After Obviously, I moved to briefs from John Sievers, which is a house brand of internationaljock.com -- only available there, as far as I know. These are very similar to the Obviouslys (see my avatar, and many of my album pics), with a huge pouch and very stretchy/supportive fabric. The colors are, I think, a bit better than what Obviously offers (if you care about that); shipping is much quicker and cheaper; and the briefs regularly go on sale. I have always been extremely happy with John Sievers, and they're now my go-to brand.
(One note for hung guys who are considering buying these: The cotton John Sievers, which generally have contrasting stitching or piping, are much tighter than the others, since cotton stretches quite a bit less than the bamboo/lycra blend found in most of their underwear. They are good to wear if you want a bit more confinement/support, such as for running or to wear under tighter dress pants, but I find these a lot less comfortable. All of my pics here are the bamboo/lycra John Sievers, NOT the cotton.)
(One other note: Both Obviously and John Sievers also offer boxer briefs. I personally prefer the briefs, for two reasons: 1. Since I'm muscular, the legs of boxer briefs tend to be tight on me. And while I've sometimes had trouble with glutes coverage in other briefs, Obviously and John Sievers briefs are cut generously enough in back even for very meaty cheeks. 2) The briefs allow a much more natural hang -- see my pics -- which I find a lot more comfortable. Any pouched boxer brief, in my experience, tends to hoist everything front-and-center, which I find both less comfortable and way more obvious under jeans or dress pants -- not what I am going for. It usually shocks people to hear that as showy as these briefs are when worn alone, the bulging is actually pretty inconspicuous under pants.)
I only recently tried Andrew Christian's "Trophy Boy" briefs. I have to say that despite all the talk about them here -- and their over-the-top "for guys who are HUNG" marketing -- I've been wildly underwhelmed. The pouch, I think, is much smaller than either Obviously or John Sievers, and the fabric is way tighter. I find my Trophy Boys to be uncomfortably confining, to be honest, and almost never wear them. I guess maybe they'd be better suited for guys who are more like 4-5" soft, and/or who have more average balls.
And, as the OP noted, the styling's not for everyone -- pretty flamboyant. I'm OK with pink or purple from John Sievers, so I'm no prude, but the waistbands of a lot of the Trophy Boys are practically rainbow flags -- and the screaming TROPHY BOY text is embarrassing if you're like me, and exercise near where you work. No way would I let professional colleagues see me in these!
Hope this is helpful to anyone who's faced similar underwear issues. Happy to chat via private message or whatever with anyone who has further questions.
Steve
Obviously was the first brand I tried, and I continue to love some of my older pairs. They are extraordinarily comfortable for a guy built like me, with a very generous pouch and extremely stretchy yet supportive fabric. I moved away from them because delivery from the company, in Australia, was slow/expensive (they are probably now available from many places other than obviously.com.au, but this was not the case circa 2010). More importantly, the company evolved away from largely hung-friendly products into underwear geared toward more average guys, and I find to difficult to ascertain on their website which styles are the older, hung-appropriate ones. I don't want to spend $25 for a pair of briefs, plus shipping, only to realize that it's a similar but more mainstream style.
After Obviously, I moved to briefs from John Sievers, which is a house brand of internationaljock.com -- only available there, as far as I know. These are very similar to the Obviouslys (see my avatar, and many of my album pics), with a huge pouch and very stretchy/supportive fabric. The colors are, I think, a bit better than what Obviously offers (if you care about that); shipping is much quicker and cheaper; and the briefs regularly go on sale. I have always been extremely happy with John Sievers, and they're now my go-to brand.
(One note for hung guys who are considering buying these: The cotton John Sievers, which generally have contrasting stitching or piping, are much tighter than the others, since cotton stretches quite a bit less than the bamboo/lycra blend found in most of their underwear. They are good to wear if you want a bit more confinement/support, such as for running or to wear under tighter dress pants, but I find these a lot less comfortable. All of my pics here are the bamboo/lycra John Sievers, NOT the cotton.)
(One other note: Both Obviously and John Sievers also offer boxer briefs. I personally prefer the briefs, for two reasons: 1. Since I'm muscular, the legs of boxer briefs tend to be tight on me. And while I've sometimes had trouble with glutes coverage in other briefs, Obviously and John Sievers briefs are cut generously enough in back even for very meaty cheeks. 2) The briefs allow a much more natural hang -- see my pics -- which I find a lot more comfortable. Any pouched boxer brief, in my experience, tends to hoist everything front-and-center, which I find both less comfortable and way more obvious under jeans or dress pants -- not what I am going for. It usually shocks people to hear that as showy as these briefs are when worn alone, the bulging is actually pretty inconspicuous under pants.)
I only recently tried Andrew Christian's "Trophy Boy" briefs. I have to say that despite all the talk about them here -- and their over-the-top "for guys who are HUNG" marketing -- I've been wildly underwhelmed. The pouch, I think, is much smaller than either Obviously or John Sievers, and the fabric is way tighter. I find my Trophy Boys to be uncomfortably confining, to be honest, and almost never wear them. I guess maybe they'd be better suited for guys who are more like 4-5" soft, and/or who have more average balls.
And, as the OP noted, the styling's not for everyone -- pretty flamboyant. I'm OK with pink or purple from John Sievers, so I'm no prude, but the waistbands of a lot of the Trophy Boys are practically rainbow flags -- and the screaming TROPHY BOY text is embarrassing if you're like me, and exercise near where you work. No way would I let professional colleagues see me in these!
Hope this is helpful to anyone who's faced similar underwear issues. Happy to chat via private message or whatever with anyone who has further questions.
Steve
I like these also,in the standard brief style,they are my defalt daily underwear.They are very comfy and hold everything just fine.
I like the products by SAXX: https://www.saxxunderwear.com/?&utm...6iV5tXPv1hfxWYJNJGXb4jyezpg1UAc_IgaAqFt8P8HAQ
And David Archy's separate pouch models: http://www.amazon.com/David-Archy-S...434505270&sr=1-26&refinements=p_4:David+Archy
And David Archy's separate pouch models: http://www.amazon.com/David-Archy-S...434505270&sr=1-26&refinements=p_4:David+Archy
smoothsailor
Superior Member
I really would love to find some more pouch-style briefs or boxer-briefs that comfortably hold a big softie.
these CK's are still my favorite....they are described as pouch style, but they have a shape that accommodates me.
http://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/...-comfy-and-sexy-brief-ive-experienced.840468/
most pouch-style stuff, i've found, just has the effect of boosting our little mounds of manhood...i definitely don't desire any boosting
these CK's are still my favorite....they are described as pouch style, but they have a shape that accommodates me.
http://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/...-comfy-and-sexy-brief-ive-experienced.840468/
most pouch-style stuff, i've found, just has the effect of boosting our little mounds of manhood...i definitely don't desire any boosting
I'm a big fan of the pouch style now, though have only tried Andrew Christian. The info in this thread is therefore really helpful.
The "trophy boy" line is decent and comfortable; I don't find that it causes an excessive "boost of the mounds of [my] manhood" (lol). However, there's another line where the pouch is formed by an internal piece of material. The idea is you plant your package in that internal pouch. But it is way too constricting and uncomortable.
Not sure if I'm into the name "trophy boy" either, and the designs are colours are a bit over-the-top for me.
The "trophy boy" line is decent and comfortable; I don't find that it causes an excessive "boost of the mounds of [my] manhood" (lol). However, there's another line where the pouch is formed by an internal piece of material. The idea is you plant your package in that internal pouch. But it is way too constricting and uncomortable.
Not sure if I'm into the name "trophy boy" either, and the designs are colours are a bit over-the-top for me.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2001
- Posts
- 824
- Media
- 34
- Likes
- 3,547
- Points
- 748
- Location
- New Hampshire + Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
Ironically, the briefs I like best (Obviously and John Sievers) are generally marketed as "enhancing," which is the last thing I need. But they're also highly accommodating of us bigger guys. (I can understand why they market them this way -- there are a lot more guys looking for "enhancing" than "accommodating"!)
Steve
I was surprised that up until Scooter5 no one had mentioned Big Boys. These are the only briefs I wear now. They are extremely comfortable, with ample room for LPSG-scale equipment. I do wish they were a bit bigger in the balls area, but there's a nice forward pouch to hold your dick. The material is soft stretchy and the overall look is killer.
http://www.bigboyspants.com/
http://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/big-boys.896428/
http://www.bigboyspants.com/
http://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/big-boys.896428/
smoothsailor
Superior Member
smoothsailor
Superior Member
wouldn't it be great if there truly was a brand/style designed for accommodating a ~6-7 inch soft cock???? the reality is the market would be so small for such a style that there would be no business case to manufacture.
i ,personally, would be thrilled, for instance, to order a custom pair of obviously naked 9 inch boxer briefs. a couple tiny modifications and they would be perfect for my taste. 1) a slightly longer pouch...say 30mm to start, 2) seem under your balls moved rearward towards your u-know-what ~10mm. Once dimensions were dialed-in, i'd pay $100 for these.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2001
- Posts
- 824
- Media
- 34
- Likes
- 3,547
- Points
- 748
- Location
- New Hampshire + Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
Various hung-friendly brands of underwear have taken LPSG by storm over the years -- but then the companies have gone out of business, because (as you note) very big guys are a very small market.
In the mid-2000s, there was a brand called E2U, one of the earliest with a real pouch up front, that became popular here. I thought they were great (at least compared to what else was available at the time), but the company went under after a year or two.
It's a big part of why I tend to post here on LPSG about hung-appropriate underwear. If more well-endowed guys know about, and buy, these brands, they'll be a lot likelier to stay in business for those of us who need them.
Steve
these look promising if there is enough material there to make a proper pouch. http://www.ufmunderwear.com/sport.html
- t_o,
You guys are right about Aussie bum. Put on first pair this morning. Pushes you out way too much. These were designed for someone for confidence boost. The equivalent of a padded bra for a woman that adds 3 cup sizes.... Yikes! Sticking to AC and wil probably order Oblivious next as the search for the most comfortable ouch continues.
Can anyone tell me the name of the underwear that has the pouch and pushes to cock and balls to the forefront. i love the look and hope it translates like that through your clothes. If anyone know the brand and where you can get them in the states i would appreciate your feedback.
Similar threads
