Don't cut it, your cock is perfect.
thanksDon't cut it, your cock is perfect.
There are no arguments for circumcision without a medical indication.
1 and 2 With appropriate hygiene, these claims can not be upheld.
Hygiene means washing the penis in the morning, in the evening and after use with the foreskin retracted.
3 There's no arguing about looks. I like uncircumcised penises much better. In addition, the foreskin is intended to protect the sensitive glans. This is so provided by nature and therefore certainly not wrong. A long foreskin has the advantage that it is great for masturbating. Because you always have a vulva, so to speak. The circumcision in different religions was ultimately made for hygienic reasons and then religiously transfigured over the years. The religions prescribing this are all originated in areas where water shortage was. Religions that have arisen in other areas without water shortage require no circumcision. The prudish US Americans originally introduced circumcision to curb masturbation. This does not work as we know. But out of ignorance, the circumcision was continued. Luckily, this calamity also subsides in the USA.
![]()
Agreed. What bugs me is people talking about how better it is being cut but they don’t say they had something like severe phimosis, alluding to everyone is that way. It’s very misleading.If the foreskin is always open, the glans is brighter, because a creatine layer forms, which also provides for a further desensitization, which may also mean a stimulus and loss of feeling. Therefore, I keep my foreskin closed and open it only for masturbation, urinating and washing. I would never let myself be circumcised because one can masturbate with pre-excellence.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.